Drakenex Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 (edited) looking good! thanks a lot bread-man! Edited February 19, 2017 by Drakenex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooperMNG Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 @Beale do you plan to model some specific Pirs/Poisk parts? It looks odd when I dock a Soyuz to my station, because of the two identical parts (Soyuz OM acting both as a OM and ISS airlock module) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kopapaka Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 N1? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drakenex Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 11 hours ago, kopapaka said: N1? Whoa! where is that? 11 hours ago, trooperMNG said: @Beale do you plan to model some specific Pirs/Poisk parts? It looks odd when I dock a Soyuz to my station, because of the two identical parts (Soyuz OM acting both as a OM and ISS airlock module) That could be nice!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kopapaka Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 (edited) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ještěd_Tower https: // Edited February 19, 2017 by kopapaka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptKordite Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 14 hours ago, trooperMNG said: do you plan to model some specific Pirs/Poisk parts? It looks odd when I dock a Soyuz to my station, because of the two identical parts I did my Pirs docking module with a H-WDX Adapter Segment tucked down over top of an H-BVI Habitation Module and a Contares Khi Orbital Module tucked underneath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notJebKerman Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 On 2/18/2017 at 2:21 PM, Beale said: Very strange.. I will have to take a look when I have a chance. it's okay now. at least for me. i did a bit of code changing and got parts i needed back while still having new tantares installed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted February 20, 2017 Author Share Posted February 20, 2017 On 19/02/2017 at 4:37 AM, Drakenex said: looking good! thanks a lot bread-man! Stunning! On 19/02/2017 at 11:30 AM, trooperMNG said: @Beale do you plan to model some specific Pirs/Poisk parts? It looks odd when I dock a Soyuz to my station, because of the two identical parts (Soyuz OM acting both as a OM and ISS airlock module) There has been a lot of requests, not a bad idea to make, but bundle with the Progress (Like Rassvet before). 3 hours ago, notJebKerman said: it's okay now. at least for me. i did a bit of code changing and got parts i needed back while still having new tantares installed. Cool She blinded me with science! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptKordite Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 On 2/17/2017 at 7:01 PM, Beale said: It looks like the truss should probably be wider from images, I will remake at 1.875m maybe. I am building a Mir 2 Proyekt 1993 and overlayed it onto one of the more detailed plans. A few things are off a touch in length and can be tweaked but the truss looks to be spot on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted February 21, 2017 Author Share Posted February 21, 2017 On 19/02/2017 at 11:38 PM, kopapaka said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ještěd_Tower https: // Nice video (what software?). I have a new landmark to visit! 15 hours ago, CaptKordite said: I am building a Mir 2 Proyekt 1993 and overlayed it onto one of the more detailed plans. A few things are off a touch in length and can be tweaked but the truss looks to be spot on. Wow! I'm surprised it is that close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted February 21, 2017 Author Share Posted February 21, 2017 (edited) Lab on GitHub It's really heavy (Kvant was Proton's heaviest payload ever) and is worse than the stock science module. Edited February 21, 2017 by Beale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kopapaka Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 4 hours ago, Beale said: Nice video (what software?). I have a new landmark to visit! Ehhh... No software Smartphone and B&W mode Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, kopapaka said: Ehhh... No software Smartphone and B&W mode Huh... the effect actually really works! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kopapaka Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 (edited) Edited February 22, 2017 by kopapaka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legcutter Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 (edited) On 22.02.2017 at 4:37 AM, Beale said: It's really heavy (Kvant was Proton's heaviest payload ever) and is worse than the stock science module. The single Kvant module looks a little bit small to be the heaviest It was Kvant + FGB tug (made from TKS without a VA return capsule). Something like this: Also it's strange for me to have a potent space astrophysical observatory being worser than that stock giantish aluminum can Edited February 23, 2017 by Legcutter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted February 23, 2017 Author Share Posted February 23, 2017 (edited) 17 hours ago, Legcutter said: The single Kvant module looks a little bit small to be the heaviest It was Kvant + FGB tug (made from TKS without a VA return capsule). Something like this: Also it's strange for me to have a potent space astrophysical observatory being worser than that stock giantish aluminum can Good point! I have rebalanced it to be more or less equal. Github! - OMS - Solar panel normal maps Edited February 23, 2017 by Beale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calvin_Maclure Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 hour ago, Beale said: Good point! I have rebalanced it to be more or less equal. Github! - OMS - Solar panel normal maps Like those OMS. What's the output? And nice flame in the bucket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InsaneDruid Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 On 23.2.2017 at 6:19 AM, Legcutter said: The single Kvant module looks a little bit small to be the heaviest It was Kvant + FGB tug (made from TKS without a VA return capsule). Something like this: Also it's strange for me to have a potent space astrophysical observatory being worser than that stock giantish aluminum can The 37KE Module without tks-5 should be around 11 metric tons compared to the more or less 19 tons of the tks based modules (kvant-2, kristall, spektr), so about 57-58% of those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted February 24, 2017 Author Share Posted February 24, 2017 19 hours ago, Calvin_Maclure said: Like those OMS. What's the output? And nice flame in the bucket. 10kn each, not a lot for the 10,000kg module, but enough. 2 hours ago, InsaneDruid said: The 37KE Module without tks-5 should be around 11 metric tons compared to the more or less 19 tons of the tks based modules (kvant-2, kristall, spektr), so about 57-58% of those. 6 1/4 tons?! It seems a lot for a Kerbal part, but then again very heavy parts can be interesting (Station Science). Good to hear feedback on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InsaneDruid Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Depends on how you scale weight. If based on a 0.64 spatial axis shrink, weight should go down .64^3 times as does the volume, not just by linear scale.That's how I scale fuel (plus density of stock fuel/ox and the different ratios of it). Comes close to stock units of the same size. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted February 24, 2017 Author Share Posted February 24, 2017 3 hours ago, InsaneDruid said: Depends on how you scale weight. If based on a 0.64 spatial axis shrink, weight should go down .64^3 times as does the volume, not just by linear scale.That's how I scale fuel (plus density of stock fuel/ox and the different ratios of it). Comes close to stock units of the same size. 4.5 tons sounds good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legcutter Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) 16 hours ago, InsaneDruid said: The 37KE Module without tks-5 should be around 11 metric tons compared to the more or less 19 tons of the tks based modules (kvant-2, kristall, spektr), so about 57-58% of those. Not just "should be", it actually was 11 tons, so u are correct (and 22,8 with FGB tug on launch). 9 hours ago, Beale said: Now this new solar panel is one of few things I was terribly missing when building my Mir complex using old Tantares parts. Mr. Bready just have made me happier then ever Edited February 25, 2017 by Legcutter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted February 25, 2017 Author Share Posted February 25, 2017 3 hours ago, Legcutter said: Now this new solar panel is one of few things I was terribly missing when building my Mir complex using old Tantares parts. Mr. Bready just have made me happier then ever It was a very alarming omission! It may be quite a complicated part, if I can get the config set up correctly... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rissa Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 On 19.2.2017 at 5:37 AM, Drakenex said: looking good! thanks a lot bread-man! Are there any Craftfiles for Zarya and Zwezda available? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drakenex Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 40 minutes ago, Rissa said: Are there any Craftfiles for Zarya and Zwezda available? they are very easy to build, let me know if you have any problem! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.