Guest Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 On 9/25/2016 at 9:00 PM, Beale said: Every part will be orange from now on. I'm calling it Tantares version 2, Netherlands edition. Expand I'll be sure to do up the flag of the Dutch East India Company! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjsnh Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 (edited) Request : When making the .cfg files for the "clean slate" Tantares pack, is it possible to use unique part names that won't conflict/overlap with parts from the "old" Tantares? For example "name = TantaresNG_Crew_A" instead of "name = Tantares_Crew_A"? (or something like that) The reasoning is that it would make things far more simple for modders to make modulemanager patches if both mods are installed side by side. To be specific, for my own mod I'd like to allow the user to have the "new" and "old" installed side by side, and use a simple modulemanager patch to remove the "old" parts which have been replaced/updated, without requiring them to go in and manually delete directories etc etc if that makes sense. Edited September 26, 2016 by tjsnh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 26, 2016 Author Share Posted September 26, 2016 On 9/26/2016 at 9:06 AM, tjsnh said: Request : When making the .cfg files for the "clean slate" Tantares pack, is it possible to use unique part names that won't conflict/overlap with parts from the "old" Tantares? For example "name = TantaresNG_Crew_A" instead of "name = Tantares_Crew_A"? (or something like that) The reasoning is that it would make things far more simple for modders to make modulemanager patches if both mods are installed side by side. To be specific, for my own mod I'd like to allow the user to have the "new" and "old" installed side by side, and use a simple modulemanager patch to remove the "old" parts which have been replaced/updated, without requiring them to go in and manually delete directories etc etc if that makes sense. Expand Seems a good idea to me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjsnh Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Those new parts are looking great! I particularly like the new comms dish and docking port. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 27, 2016 Author Share Posted September 27, 2016 On 9/26/2016 at 9:33 PM, tjsnh said: Those new parts are looking great! I particularly like the new comms dish and docking port. Expand Thanks! The Antenna is quite comfortable to fold, as seen here, it does not take up a wide space. They fold out correct as the real Soyuz. I would also like to include to older IGLA style Antenna with the Soyuz parts as it is a better fit there. As a random bonus, flags? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noah_Blade Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 On 9/27/2016 at 9:17 PM, Beale said: As a random bonus, flags? Expand Nation Double or Nation seems best to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 28, 2016 Author Share Posted September 28, 2016 (edited) On 9/28/2016 at 9:14 PM, Noah_Blade said: Nation Double or Nation seems best to me Expand They are only 10KB (with indexed 16 colours) each, It is best to just include them all Edited September 28, 2016 by Beale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 29, 2016 Author Share Posted September 29, 2016 What's this? Oh. Oh! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted September 29, 2016 Share Posted September 29, 2016 But how does it unfold? D: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legoclone09 Posted September 29, 2016 Share Posted September 29, 2016 I am mad. School wi-fi blocks Imgur. I can't see these parts. AUUUUGH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 29, 2016 Author Share Posted September 29, 2016 (edited) On 9/29/2016 at 9:21 PM, CobaltWolf said: But how does it unfold? D: Expand Ha! Do I look lke I have an engineering degree? Maybe like this way, I think (But, more tightly packed). On 9/29/2016 at 9:21 PM, legoclone09 said: I am mad. School wi-fi blocks Imgur. I can't see these parts. AUUUUGH Expand Here it is in ASCII | | _ __ __ __ ___ _|_ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |_|__|__|__|___|___| Edited September 29, 2016 by Beale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjsnh Posted September 29, 2016 Share Posted September 29, 2016 Those folding panels look absolutely amazing! They're going to be fixed once deployed right? Not rotating to face the sun? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 30, 2016 Author Share Posted September 30, 2016 On 9/29/2016 at 11:51 PM, tjsnh said: Those folding panels look absolutely amazing! They're going to be fixed once deployed right? Not rotating to face the sun? Expand My idea is to keep all the solar panels fixed (I imagine in the future it will be tweakable sun-tracking anyway!). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjsnh Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 On 9/30/2016 at 5:14 PM, Beale said: My idea is to keep all the solar panels fixed (I imagine in the future it will be tweakable sun-tracking anyway!). Expand Good call. The stock tracking-panels will fill that role, non-tracking ones add some flavor, are more "accurate" to the real-world parts being represented, and frankly can be more useful. For example - modeling a Vega-style probe bus, with it's panels, in KSP is/was/would-be very difficult without some non-tracking panels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 30, 2016 Author Share Posted September 30, 2016 Wolololo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 On 9/30/2016 at 5:46 PM, tjsnh said: Good call. The stock tracking-panels will fill that role, non-tracking ones add some flavor, are more "accurate" to the real-world parts being represented, and frankly can be more useful. For example - modeling a Vega-style probe bus, with it's panels, in KSP is/was/would-be very difficult without some non-tracking panels. Expand Russian probe bus parts (including panels) is @akron's next goal after Surveyor is done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 30, 2016 Author Share Posted September 30, 2016 New destruction effects? Facinating! Even the hinges are flung as separate parts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 ಠ_ಠ That's not an OM... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 30, 2016 Author Share Posted September 30, 2016 (edited) On 9/30/2016 at 10:20 PM, CobaltWolf said: ಠ_ಠ That's not an OM... Expand "It's a feature" Reveal hidden contents I think a Tantares claw would be useful, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I will make the new 1.2 version available soon, so people can play around with them a little. I just need to complete bump-maps + advanced (modern) solar panels. Edited September 30, 2016 by Beale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjsnh Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 On 9/30/2016 at 9:57 PM, CobaltWolf said: Russian probe bus parts (including panels) is @akron's next goal after Surveyor is done. Expand I found some probe bus parts in the "monkey business" mod, but it certainly seems to be an under-represented bit of parts in terms of stock-alike-ish packs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooperMNG Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 On 9/30/2016 at 9:41 PM, Beale said: Wolololo snip Expand and now we will surely need a wider fairing base Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoFatalis Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 (edited) I have two questions : 1.About two weeks ago you showed a picture of a cheaper souyz capsule without a hatch , will it be in the release? 2.Is there going to be a revamp to the progress parts and the progress orbital modules?(I don't really think they actually need a revamp..) Edited October 1, 2016 by NeoFatalis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjsnh Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 On 9/30/2016 at 10:18 PM, Beale said: New destruction effects? Facinating! Even the hinges are flung as separate parts. Expand .. were you trying to grapple Gilly? :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabbman Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 On 9/29/2016 at 9:24 PM, Beale said: Expand Looks awesome Beale, good effort! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted October 1, 2016 Author Share Posted October 1, 2016 On 10/1/2016 at 8:01 AM, trooperMNG said: and now we will surely need a wider fairing base Expand I have something in mind, much requested, to amend this. But, figuring out how to fold and unfold is tricky! On 10/1/2016 at 9:19 AM, NeoFatalis said: I have two questions : 1.About two weeks ago you showed a picture of a cheaper souyz capsule without a hatch , will it be in the release? 2.Is there going to be a revamp to the progress parts and the progress orbital modules?(I don't really think they actually need a revamp..) Expand Hello! 1. As soon as model-switch is available. 2. Indeed! On 10/1/2016 at 10:40 AM, tjsnh said: .. were you trying to grapple Gilly? :-) Expand Nothing to see here, move along. On 10/1/2016 at 11:12 AM, Jabbman said: Looks awesome Beale, good effort! Expand Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.