Guest Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 Well, I'm gonna tell you, release it now. I've tried balancing RCS and the OMS. What you see in RC1 is the best it can get (and the OMS are actually pretty well balanced, considering everything). I recommend the docking camera from Romfarer, it makes docking possible, if not easy. 0.21 might help with the RCS balance, and there's a plugin in the works that might let us fix the OMS, but I think there's no point waiting for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajwojo1210 Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 I agree with Dragon. A working model with slightly faulty rcs and OMS engines are things that I and (I think) most people can deal with while you attempt to fix them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyToad28 Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 I would be ok with the docking being really difficult because now I'd honestly I just want to see the thing fly and just get to fly it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jokamo Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 yep, Mechjeb can help us in the meantime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AncientAstronaut Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 Everyone please calm down. Don't tell him to release it now. And to the maker -- don't release it now. Iron out the bugs in the system, test the spacecraft, adjust the hardware and make the improvements. Release it when it's perfect. It's best to release while it's perfect than have 20 forum pages of people crying about how badly you suck for releasing something with faulty thrusters.They've waited more than a year. They can wait a little bit more. Because I am willing to for a good shuttle. In the mean time, check out Kosmo-Not's newest Shuttle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 (edited) Release it when it's perfect.Sorry, but it'll never be perfect. We do not have the original .dae models and the Squad made a rather stupid decision of making .mu files write-only. That means that unless somebody writes a custom exporter, we cannot modify RCS placement nor the OMS behavior. Plugins, 0.21 RCS update and some node trickery can help, but it'll never be as good as a new Shuttle made from scratch. The Shuttle, despite it's flaws, could be released now, since as far as I know, we fixed all we could fix. I've already tried balancing it, while it worked (more or less) for the OMS, the RCS placement is unworkable in KSP, since you can't adjust it on a per-nozzle bases, nor assign nozzles to particular type of motion.Oh, and Kosmo-Not's shuttle is stock, ugly, dinky and has no payload bay. In other words, not really good for anything. In fact, if we had folding wings, it could fit into CSS cargo bay. Don't recommend stuff like that just because it vaguely resembles the Shuttle. Edited July 11, 2013 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ledenko Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 (edited) What's wrong with the DAE files included in the download on the very first page of this thread? Edited July 12, 2013 by Ledenko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 That they do not exist? The 4.1 pack doesn't have .dae models, and earlier versions are completely different (missing all animations and landing gear, for starters). I've tried locating the .dae models for the current version, but I wasn't able to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceZealot01 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 To me... this mod is just a joke. Don't take it seriously guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCanadianVendingMachine Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 To me... this mod is just a joke. Don't take it seriously guys. What do you mean? It is the only space shuttle mod out there that is 1:1 in Kerbal size Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDBenson Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Don't feed the Trolls, please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cepheus Posted July 14, 2013 Author Share Posted July 14, 2013 Happy flying.http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/css-50/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent30632 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 (edited) Yes!!!!It's finally out!EDIT: Is the Arm supposed to be in the pack? Edited July 14, 2013 by Agent30632 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astropapi1 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Awwwwwwww yis! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobCat Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 (edited) New Shuttle perfect looking, but fuel tank looks ugly. Also... fly model... mans that WW1 plane ))) Red Baron. Edited July 14, 2013 by BobCat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strikeeagle345 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 I am also missing the forward RCS. but its in the proper gamedata folder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Frushour Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Happy flying.http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/css-50/YEEEEEESSSS!!!! I've gotta go fly it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cepheus Posted July 14, 2013 Author Share Posted July 14, 2013 I am also missing the forward RCS. but its in the proper gamedata folder.That's odd. Is anyone else having problems with the forward RCS part? I just double checked the file, and it's in there. The only thing I can suggest at the moment is to redownload the pack and reinstall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePyrateCaptain Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Cepheus, rocket2guns would be proud. Just flew your shuttle, a work of art. Launch was smooth. The model, impressive, the aerodynamics, perfect. I can now archive mt 2.0 version, and proudly fly yours. Thank you for creating this wonderful model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocket2guns Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Cepheus, rocket2guns would be proud. Just flew your shuttle, a work of art. Launch was smooth. The model, impressive, the aerodynamics, perfect. I can now archive mt 2.0 version, and proudly fly yours. Thank you for creating this wonderful model.Indeed, what a fantastic job! Well done! Wish I'd had the time to help out but clearly, you did not need it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCanadianVendingMachine Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Yes, I have a problem with the forward RCS, it does not say I have it in the game but it is in the GameData folder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent30632 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 I reinstalled the pack already and I still don't have it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justadude Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 I, too, am missing the forward RCS. It is in the game folder and I have reinstalled with no luck.Might the part not be loading properly due to the DLL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrutalRIP Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 yeah i got same problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobCat Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 CepheusYour RCS part use TASAS plugin. In your archive no have this plugin. Reupload CSS and include TASAS plugin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts