Jump to content

The Proton Pack


Recommended Posts

Kurotech Inc. presents:

The Proton Pack

*EDIT: new version can be found here*

A rather unique looking rocket in the real world, now brought to KSP! And it comes with several prebuilt payloads. The goal of this pack is an aesthetically pleasing, yet still functional craft. This is why most payloads won’t be super detailed, so the part counts don’t skyrocket, but you’ll definitely recognize them. If a payload has solar panels, press 0 to deploy them.

Javascript is disabled. View full album

Features:

- Realistic staging sequence (except for the fairing, which splits in 3 instead of 2)

- The payload capacity is very close to the real thing

- Third stage de-orbits automatically upon separation

- Several prebuilt payloads (see below)

Statistics:

- Part count: 299 (subassembly)

- Payload capacity: 21.5 mT to LKO (75km)

- Fairing jettison shortly after 3rd stage separation

TKS

Javascript is disabled. View full album

Features:

- Two in one: VA capsule and FGB

- After separation, both craft can fly autonomously

- FGB can fly indefinitely, VA has a battery life.

- Can be launched with or without crew (Warning: no LES yet!)

Statistics:

- Part count: 88

- Crew capacity: 3

- ÃŽâ€V budget: 755 m/s (TKS)

207 m/s (VA)

- Cargo: 720 units Liquid fuel

880 units Oxidizer

1200 units RCS (partially fuel)

Salyut Stations

Soyuz and Progress sold separately

Javascript is disabled. View full album

Features:

- Monolithic refuel station

- Low part count

- Balanced RCS

- Propulsion enables easy orbital changes

Statistics:

[TABLE=width: 1000, align: center]

[TR]

[TD]Salyut 1

- Part count: 54

- Crew capacity: 4

- ÃŽâ€V budget: 265 m/s

- Cargo: 990 units Liquid fuel

1210 units Oxidizer

80 units RCS[/TD]

[TD]Salyut 4

- Part count: 49

- Crew capacity: 4

- ÃŽâ€V budget: 252 m/s

- Cargo: 990 units Liquid fuel

1210 units Oxidizer

80 units RCS[/TD]

[TD]Salyut 6/7

- Part count: 50

- Crew capacity: 4

- ÃŽâ€V budget: 494 m/s

- Cargo: 990 units Liquid fuel

1210 units Oxidizer

830 units RCS (partially fuel)[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

Mir Station

Soyuz and Progress sold separately

Javascript is disabled. View full album

Features:

- Girders not included due to part count and construction considerations

- Kristall solar panels can be moved to Kvant 1

- Propulsion for orbital changes has to come from Progress (or another docked ship)

- Part count: 312 (without ships docked)

- Crew capacity: 4 (Recommended: 3)

- Cargo capacity (station is not fully fuelled upon completion)

5995 units Liquid fuel

7327 units Oxidizer

5660 untis RCS

Statistics:

[table=width: 1000, align: center]

[tr]

[td]Core module:

Part count: 41

ÃŽâ€V budget: 458m/s[/td]

[td]Kvant 1:

Part count: 67 (with FSM, without: 9)

ÃŽâ€V budget: 725m/s[/td]

[td]Kvant 2:

Part count: 61

ÃŽâ€V budget: 730m/s[/td]

[/tr]

[tr]

[td]Kristall:

Part count: 74

ÃŽâ€V budget: 763m/s[/td]

[td]Spektr:

Part count: 64

ÃŽâ€V budget: 723m/s[/td]

[td]Priroda:

Part count: 63

ÃŽâ€V budget: 758m/s[/td]

[/tr]

[/table]

OPSEK

Javascript is disabled. View full album

Features:

- Modular refuel station

- Propulsion enables orbital changes

- 4 free docking nodes for visiting craft or station expansions

Statistics:

- Part count: 155

- Crew capacity: 6 (max. 8)

- Cargo capacity: 4140 units Liquid fuel

5060 units Oxidizer

1200 units RCS

1st launch: Node module (LV: Soyuz)

- Launch to a 75km orbit

- Detach the third stage

- Wait for the next launch

2nd launch: Nauka

- Launch to a 75km orbit

- Detach the third stage

- Rendezvous with the node module

- Dock opposite of its OMS

- Raise the station to the desired height

3rd and 4th launch: Utility modules

- Launch to a 75km orbit

- Use the third stage to reach the station

- When close to the station, transfer fuel from the third stage to the module, only leave some vapours in

- Detach the third stage, wait for the boosters to burn out, point retrograde and finish de-orbit burn

- Use the OMS on the station to dock with the module (this will make it far more controllable)

- After you are lined up for docking, detach the OMS and move it out of the way

- Dock the module to the Starboard/Port docking port.

- If both modules have been docked, the OMS can be deorbited

- The auxiliary control drone on the modules can be undocked and de-orbited

ISS Modules

Javascript is disabled. View full album

Features:

- Great modular station cores

- Propulsion enables easy orbital changes

- 3 largest modules of the ROS

Statistics:

[TABLE=width: 1000, align: center]

[TR]

[TD]Zarya

- Part count: 62

- ÃŽâ€V budget: 720 m/s

- Cargo: 990 units Liquid fuel

1210 units Oxidizer

1200 units RCS (partially fuel)[/TD]

[TD]Zvezda

- Part count: 51

- ÃŽâ€V budget: 467 m/s

- Cargo: 990 units Liquid fuel

1210 units Oxidizer

830 units RCS (partially fuel)

- Crew capacity: 4[/TD]

[TD]Nauka

- Part count: 64

- ÃŽâ€V budget: 719 m/s

- Cargo: 990 units Liquid fuel

1210 units Oxidizer

1200 units RCS (partially fuel)[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

Edited by Kurotenshi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hrmmm .... Kuro ... mind if i deconstruct your Proton to chek on some details? cause i have soem trouble with mine ... oh where did you got the infos about the second stage enginecover?

I believe the second stage interstage stays attached to the second stage.

It should go like this:

  1. Second stage ignition (the engines start while the first stage engines are still firing)
  2. First stage cutoff
  3. First stage separation

2.3.1 Proton Booster Ascent

The Proton LV uses a standard ascent trajectory to place the Orbital Unit (OU), which includes the Breeze

M, PLA and SC, into a 170 km to 230 km (92 nmi to 124 nmi) low-earth circular parking orbit inclined at 51.5â°

after the first Breeze M engine firing. A standard ascent trajectory is required to meet jettisoned stage and

payload fairing (PLF) impact point constraints. The use of a standard ascent trajectory also simplifies lower

ascent mission design and related analysis, thereby increasing system reliability. Once the OU is in the

standard parking orbit the SC can be transferred to its target orbit by the Breeze M.

Table 2.3.1-1 lists the time of occurrence for major ascent events for a typical launch. Figure 2.3.1-1

pictorially illustrates a typical Proton ascent into the standard parking orbit and subsequent Breeze M flight to

the target orbit.

At approximately T-1.75 s, the six Stage 1 RD-276 engines are commanded to start at 40% of full thrust. Full

thrust is commanded at T-0.15 s. Lift-off confirmation is signaled at T+0.5 s. The staged ignition sequence

allows verification that all engines are functioning nominally before being committed to launch. The LV

executes a roll maneuver beginning at T+10 s to align the flight azimuth to the desired direction.

Stage 2’s three RD-0210 and one RD-0211 engines are commanded to ignite at 119 s and are commanded

to full thrust when Stage 1 is jettisoned at 123 s. Stage 3’s vernier engines are ignited at 332 s followed by

Stage 2 shutdown at 334 s.

Stage 2 separation occurs after six small, solid retro-fire motors are ignited at 335 s into flight. Stage 3’s

single RD-0213 main engine is ignited at 338 s. PLF jettison typically occurs at 348 s into flight, depending

on SC heating constraints. The Stage 3 main engine burns until shutdown at 576 s. The four vernier engines

burn for an additional 12 s and are shutdown at 588 s.

The Stage 3 retro-fire motors are ignited and Stage 3 is separated from the Breeze M or SC. Figure 2.3.1-2

shows ascent ground track and jettison points, and ground tracking station acquisition times. Figure 2.3.1-3

shows the times and values for the vehicle’s inertial velocity, altitude, longitudinal acceleration, and dynamic

pressure.

MGk7KUO.png

Source: http://www.ilslaunch.com/sites/default/files/pdf/PMPG%20Section%202.pdf

General Proton M info: http://www.ilslaunch.com/sites/default/files/pdf/PMPG%20Section%20A.pdf

Edited by Giggleplex777
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@WooDzor

Yeah, the TKS is actually pretty interesting. It's basically a small station module with a crew capsule attached. The "station part" (aka the FGB) later became the basis for the Mir modules (except for the core, that was based on Salyut), as well as Zarya and Nauka for the ISS. The TKS was actually intended as a resupply craft for the Almaz stations, but then switched over to the Salyut 6 and 7. It never flew manned before it was cancelled, unfortunately.

@Darth

I simply based it of launch simulation from Orbiter, the first one you find on youtube :P I just watched it again and noticed some small mistakes, which I've quickly fixed now. Just some simple staging differences, like the exact number of seperatrons and how the first stage detaches. It doesn't quite start up before the first stage burns out, but that's mainly because of explosion hazard and not making launching it too complicated. And feel free to tear it apart. I do use editor extensions though, to align stuff better with vertical snap, and sometime to surface attach things that aren't surface attachable

Edited by Kurotenshi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Kuro

found the video: finaly a very good video about the proton ! thx a lot... and yes the enginecover of the second stage. i knew some pictures of the second stage in a russian VAB and you can clearly see the conic shape of the end with the four nozzles. i always wondered if they drop the engine cover during flight like the Soyuz rocket. and so it is ! perfect. but i wonder about the payloadfairings. judging after some animations and official documents, the fairings are letision AFTER third stage ignition and not during secondstage burn. needs more investigation :D

but rework of Proton M with Breez-M in progress, will show it later :)

edit_ dang ! can't give you rep :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@WooDzor

Yeah, the TKS is actually pretty interesting. It's basically a small station module with a crew capsule attached. The "station part" (aka the FGB) later became the basis for the Mir modules (except for the core, that was based on Salyut), as well as Zarya and Nauka for the ISS. The TKS was actually intended as a resupply craft for the Almaz stations, but then switched over to the Salyut 6 and 7. It never flew manned before it was cancelled, unfortunately.

it's quite similar to the Gemini MOL, I build that one last weekend. good fun these small science/intelligence modules :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, they're great, it's a shame they were so underused. Gemini MOL did get a lot less far than the TKS though, and I love how you see the vast difference between Russian and US development, even if they build something similar.

Also Darth, the fairing does drop after 3rd stage ignites, like mine does. It's in Giggle's source:

Stage 2 separation occurs after six small, solid retro-fire motors are ignited at 335 s into flight. Stage 3’s

single RD-0213 main engine is ignited at 338 s. PLF jettison typically occurs at 348 s into flight, depending

on SC heating constraints.

The PLF here stand for PayLoad Fairing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and yes the enginecover of the second stage. i knew some pictures of the second stage in a russian VAB and you can clearly see the conic shape of the end with the four nozzles. i always wondered if they drop the engine cover during flight like the Soyuz rocket. and so it is ! perfect.

I'm 95% sure the second stage interstage does not separate from the second stage. Sgt_flyer and I did extensive research of this while we were building our own replicas and we found no official evidence that it was jettisoned. The engines are so close to the interstage that if the interstage was detachable, it would have less than 30cm clearance from the engine bells. Furthermore, the video isn't completely accurate; it's just an artist's impression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There we go, added the Mir station, all modules are launched on the Proton, as they should.

The Core module is based on the Salyuts, and has it's own propulsion. Kvant 1 has and FGB derived FSM (Functional Service Module) that gets it to the station. The other modules are FGB based modules, are self propelled, and can dock on their own.

I left off the girders, because that would raise the part count, and also make construction more complex. Normally only one solar panel added to Kvant 1 came from the Kristall module, and was later replaced during a shuttle visit, as well as adding the second one. All this (girders and solar panels) was done during EVAs, which could be done with KAS, but I like to keep it stock.

Have fun building your own Mir without melting your computer :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots and lots of part clipping, and some help from editor extensions :P I mainly use the vertical attachment and enabling surface attachment for node-attached parts.

Have you tried tearing it to bits part by part, and clipping the camera trough it? I find those often help to figure out how a craft is built.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Current size?

And I chose for a 2.5m based one, instead of 3.75m based, as that is more to scale for both the prebuilt payloads, as well as payload capacity of the LV. the capacity of a 3.75m based one would probably be far higher, but more unrealistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...