Rate The Spaceship Above You

[CelticCossack51]

10/10 What those don't exist! *burns secret files in fireplace.*

It's a Gemini lander!

Edited January 7, 2015 by CelticCossack51

[StrandedonEarth]

5/10 Can't see enough detail

[Jon144]

8/10 Great for blowing up cylons but doesn't need aerodynamic fins in space.

Edited January 7, 2015 by Jon144

[StrandedonEarth]

5/10, looks big. Also looks like two planetarium

After finding this pic I realized where Squad modeled the linear RCS thruster from

[mythbusters844]

8/10 Tons of detail, shiny engines, and looks functional.

9/10: Nice Apollo replica, but that doesn't look like a 2-stage lander.....

Yeah, the lander was simply a placeholder because I this mission was a simple test of the CSM. I later made a pretty accurate 2-stage LM and a Saturn V to go with it, but I never actually launched it.

[r4pt0r]

9/10, I am glad NASA didn't add jet engines and spam intakes.

[problemecium]

5/10. It's the 21st century; Asteroids has evolved!

[Kinglet]

3/10 Struts look weak and the engine pods are awkwardly boxy.

[CelticCossack51]

8/10 A nice little mini-shuttle to take your friends on.

[mythbusters844]

6/10 Looks pretty similar to the Space Shuttle but would be great for combing for a space probe lost on the moon.

[megatiger78]

10/10 shuttle in ksp

[Wanderfound]

8/10.

Boxy, but good. I like it.

The coolest little dude (not) in our solar system:

[TonyC]

7/10

Hail Real Life ! Very slow though. Not enough FTL.

Check this out :

[megatiger78]

10/10 EVE

[Kinglet]

7/10 Nice, but the textures look weird.

[Vaporo]

5/10

Your Alcubierre drive is on sideweys.

[Kinglet]

5/10

Your Alcubierre drive is on sideweys.

http://worth1000.s3.amazonaws.com/submissions/524000/524414_c562_625x1000.jpg

No, its a spinning habitation ring used when stationary.

By the way, 10/10 for that ship.

Rate these battlecruisers:

[RogueMason]

No, its a spinning habitation ring used when stationary.

Though one must question how anyone gets into that habitation ring at all, as it's always spinning; combined with no central column, you'd have to have pretty big breaks in the ring's 'floor' that enabled the crew to jump inside before the gap passed. Still, I love the Imperial ships (Clipper included) save for one thing; they're Imperial. I won't go into my disliking of the Empire here.

Federal Battlecruisers... 8/10. I do like them, but not enough to warrant the full score.

[worir4]

9/10 Looks big.

[zxczxczbfg]

8/10 Practical!

[Vaporo]

6/10

I didn't even know you could make rockets that small in KSP.

[problemecium]

5/10. Adorable, simple, but not able to go to space and therefore not a spaceship.

[Vaporo]

2/10

Anything can fly if you use enough HyperEdit.

5/10. Adorable, simple, but not able to go to space and therefore not a spaceship.

Oh, yes. That is before it was placed on top of the launch vehicle:

[Mr_Brain]

5/10 Looks very impressive, but I don't really see something that large not exploding on the launch pad without more struts than the universe's physics engine can handle.

[Kinglet]

5/10 Looks very impressive, but I don't really see something that large not exploding on the launch pad without more struts than the universe's physics engine can handle.

http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/memoryalpha/images/9/99/Phoenix_space.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20100605052029&path-prefix=en

http://www.cygnus-x1.net/links/lcars/blueprints/jac-phoenix/jac-phoenix-1.jpg

Iconic, but I dislike the shape a bit 6/10.