Jump to content

Build the biggest airplane (that can land)


Recommended Posts

So, I took a stab at the endurance challenge and proceeded to immediately break the altitude rule, thus I decided nuts to it and ran the engines dry.

It cruises quite happily at about Mach 2 at 13 to 17km altitude and made it about 2/3rd around the kerbol. I was actually surprised at how easy this was.

longdistance.jpg

Meanwhile the CEO of HEMT industries was dissatisfied with the Lord Humongous and thus ordered a stretch limo version. I have dubbed this one the Lord Humongous II or the 'Titanic' for it\'s distinctive profile and it\'s penchant for snapping in half.

lordhumongous2.jpg

I\'ve yet to successfully land it but it does fly, the stretch definitely has taken it\'s toll on the plane\'s performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I took a stab at the endurance challenge and proceeded to immediately break the altitude rule, thus I decided nuts to it and ran the engines dry.

It cruises quite happily at about Mach 2 at 13 to 17km altitude and made it about 2/3rd around the kerbol. I was actually surprised at how easy this was.

longdistance.jpg

Meanwhile the CEO of HEMT industries was dissatisfied with the Lord Humongous and thus ordered a stretch limo version. I have dubbed this one the Lord Humongous II or the 'Titanic' for it\'s distinctive profile and it\'s penchant for snapping in half.

lordhumongous2.jpg

I\'ve yet to successfully land it but it does fly, the stretch definitely has taken it\'s toll on the plane\'s performance.

Ok, but please first read all the rules, I miss a lot of pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, but please first read all the rules, I miss a lot of pictures.

None of these are really contest entries. More just WIPs. Once they do qualify I\'ll post em properly with pictures and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just started work on a 25 Barrett length aircraft.

This will be intense.

What have Science done?

Just a tip - be prepared to painfully inch the plane forward in the SPH in order to build in certain areas... we are gonna need a bigger building!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A question: If I make a big airplane I need a lot of engines to lift it off. But if I look to all the people with very big crafts I don\'t see really many engines. So how do you guys lift it off? If I know this I finally can fly my huge airplane : The Freedom Flyer I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A question: If I make a big airplane I need a lot of engines to lift it off. But if I look to all the people with very big crafts I don\'t see really many engines. So how do you guys lift it off? If I know this I finally can fly my huge airplane : The Freedom Flyer I.

Use the powerful jets, and have wings designed to create a lot of lift. If it can generate a lot of lift, then it doesn\'t need such a high takeoff speed.

My VA Kindle utilises down-facing jets, but these are hard to balance so I don\'t recommend them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use the powerful jets, and have wings designed to create a lot of lift. If it can generate a lot of lift, then it doesn\'t need such a high takeoff speed.

My VA Kindle utilises down-facing jets, but these are hard to balance so I don\'t recommend them.

So I only need bigger wings?

Wing=Lift ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why should wings generate lift? :P

Well, a plane uses wings to generate lift, so yours should do so too.

And, never asked yourself why they show 'Lift ratio' in their description?

Sorry, not my smartest question.

But tnx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His is 11 Barrett Units long by 15 BU wide.

I think. I can\'t see properly because he hasn\'t taken a the picture from above.

My Kindle is 18 BU by 9 BU.

11+15=26

18+9=27

Therefore my aircraft is bigger. He just has more impressive wings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn\'t it be more logical to times them together?

11 x 15 = 1652

18 x 9 = 1622

If you must. But its only logical if the aircraft were cuboids.

I presumed we were doing this by longest aircraft and widest wingspan, not presumed volume. Multiplying gives volume. My aircraft had 17 Barret Units of Mk3 hulls, a number of Mk2 hulls, and some Mk1 fuel tanks. Which means the Kindle should have greater volume against the line of Mk1 fuel tanks and a small number more for the engines that make up the Ultratanker.

Its the wings that make the Ultratanker look bigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...