TheMoonRover Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 93... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Sorry, Deu, I already did that. Did you see the post below Ethan's?88Yes. You pointed out a mistake, but didn't revert to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanadams Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 By the way I don't care who wins I already have won Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMoonRover Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 I thought he pointed out the mistake then subtracted one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 I'm sorry, I meant this one here.A quote from Due:79We went from there.94 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanadams Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 What's the count? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMoonRover Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 95 now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Oh, ok. Doesn't matter, though, cause this whole thing is invalid Is it 50? Please don't mess up hereno, it's 51.49 down we go52 crosses fingersnow its 51Ethan, your post was invalid b/c Fel's.I overrode his post, see rule 7....The correct number is 51. I posted 51. Fel posted 49 and overrode me. I posted 51 and overwrote him again. Ethan, your post was invalid from the start.From fel's second post (50) i rasise it 1.You cannot post multiple times in one "skirmish".user z: 46user a: 45user b: 47user c: 45user d: 47This is valid, because nobody posted more times than once in the battle over progress from 46.user z: 46user a: 45user b: 47user a: 45This is invalid. As per rule #7, which states:7. In the case of two or more posts from two or more different people being posted at the same time(give or take a minute) trying to subtract/add to the same number simultaneously , the post that appears last on the thread counts toward the change in the current number. This is to avoid needless confusion and people can simply read the last post to continue the game. You also cannot spam posts in an attempt to override another person's change during the 1 minute window, only your earliest post will count in that situation. So don't spam. That means the last valid post in that battle was Fel's 49.Let's make it a 48 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanadams Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 He STOP WITH THE RULES THIS THREAD WILL BE LOCKED DOWN BECAUSE OF YOU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Wait one second while I check this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanadams Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 This is a game not a stupid rule n*** convention Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMoonRover Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 (edited) Does it really matter?Also:Guys, it's getting so a significant proportion of the posts in this game are disputes over the rules. If that doesn't stop, we'll have to close the game down, and we'd rather not do that.Hello? Where did everybody go? Edited May 3, 2015 by TheMoonRover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 I can't find any flaws in this logic. Unfortunately. However, I think that this many reverts in one day is against the spirit of the thread, so I will be leaving for a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanadams Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 So what's the count and deu thanks for messing it up again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 So what's the count and deu thanks for messing it up again Unless my revert gets disqualified for whatever reason, it's 48 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanadams Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 I'm pretty Shute your wrong so let's wait for rain dreamer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainDreamer Posted May 4, 2015 Author Share Posted May 4, 2015 (edited) If you guys are referring to this revert post: Oh, ok. Doesn't matter, though, cause this whole thing is invalid , then Deu is correct in this case. That part of the rule is there to prevent spamming, and it only allow everyone one chance to have a shot within that 1 minute window.In any case, please PM me if you guys have anything to ask about the rules, and if discussions are needed, there is even a discussion thread over here. Edited May 4, 2015 by RainDreamer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newt Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 47.Kial la suno ne helas, cxi tiam? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 465char Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chezburgar7300 Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 (edited) 47. Not looking for a heated discussion or anything, but why does this (or something like it) always pop up when the positives are near winning? Why not before? Edited May 4, 2015 by Chezburgar7300 Typo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainDreamer Posted May 4, 2015 Author Share Posted May 4, 2015 47. Not looking for a heated discussion or anything, but why does this (or something like it) always pop up when the positives are near winning? Why not before?Well, the nearer one side get to winning, the more motivation for the other side to search for an advantage to help them change the balance. People usually just pay less attention to errors otherwise, because it is exhausting to keep track of fast moving numbers and I count on it to have errors to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 47. Not looking for a heated discussion or anything, but why does this (or something like it) always pop up when the positives are near winning? Why not before?Because, let's face it, the positives are an overwhelming majority. They get near 100 far more often then the negatives get near -100. Therefore, every large revert that hits will most likely hurt the positives. I can assure you that if the situation was reversed and the negatives were winning all the time, the reverts would be hurting them.46 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanadams Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 47 ,,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endersmens Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 alright, fine. 46. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanadams Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 47 it's me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts