sh1pman

Might look like this:

Some highlights from Rogozin’s interview to TASS: Russia to develop super-heavy rocket as reusable spacecraft http://tass.com/science/1017451 Second launch pad at Vostochny spaceport may take 45 months to buildhttp://tass.com/science/1017475 Roscosmos chief specifies timeframe for Russian lunar program’s launch http://tass.com/science/1016800 Research module Nauka to be launched to ISS in November 2019http://tass.com/science/1017479

Expendable or reusable launches?

ISS spacewalk livestream:

Well, there's finally a use for LOP-G - being a fuel depot for skycrane.

Yea, that landing is probably just some artist’s imagination. It’s only supposed to be able to reach lunar orbit and return, but not land on the surface. (But honestly, I think it’ll be canceled and will never fly, but that’s another story).

Yea, until BFR starts flying. It'll have proper bathrooms and showers and everything.

Soyuz has 3 times more habitable volume than Gemini, or 2 times more per person (7.5m^3 vs 2.5m^3). Crew Dragon has something like 10 m^3 of pressurized volume, no idea how much of it is “habitable”, but let’s say all of it. Then with 4 person crew it will have the same volume per person as Soyuz, and less with larger crew.

@sevenperforce Its funny that they didn’t even need to hire a rocket scientist to get it all right. Average KSP player would be enough to polish most if not all of these ridiculous moments.

FH is only considered for resupply missions

How do these stations even dock? Are they designed specifically to do it? It’s kinda unrealistic unless they were initially placed into almost the same orbit with precisely equal inclination and longitude of ascending node. Otherwise we’re in the territory of OP thrusters and fuels, and I don’t buy it.

Cmon, everything related to Crew Dragon is interesting!

How do they compare Isp-wise?

Badassasaurus Rex

It’s really loud. “...and deliver our customers to orbit” Literally?