Jump to content

Mars Colonization Discussion Thread


NSEP

What are your opinions about colonizing Mars?  

121 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think Colonizing Mars is a good idea?

    • No, its not really usefull and will have negative consequences
      8
    • Yes/No its not that usefull but will have no negative or positive outcomes
      13
    • Yeah its a good idea! It will have positive outcome.
      58
    • Hell yeah lets colonize Mars it fun!
      34
    • Other
      8
  2. 2. Do you think we are going to colonize Mars one day

    • Yes, soon!
      46
    • Yes, but in the far future.
      51
    • No, but it could be possible
      12
    • No, never.
      5
    • Other
      7


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Kerbal7 said:

Everything at Mars wants to kill you. Including the dirt. 

Mars Surface Is Looking Much Deadlier Than We Previously Thought

https://www.sciencealert.com/mars-surface-looks-to-be-much-more-deadly-than-we-previously-thought

I had not seen this. Thanks...

I'm a chemist. I promise you that 1) they are absolutely right: hard UV + perchlorate is bad for organic chemistry, let alone life. 2) perchlorates are not toxic to humans in multi gram amounts. In fact they used to be available as lozenges. As the article implies, UV is the killer here. And the right plastic is like SPF 10000+ :P

8 hours ago, Green Baron said:

Edit: A series of satellites or landstrips does what exactly to create a planetary magnetic field ?

But even a magnetic field would not enable Mars to hold an atmosphere (not enough gravity) and no speculative process can generate one faster than it escapes.

Actually I was going to propose the same thing. Rings around the planet, made of superconducting magnets. Outrageous, but not impossible.

And a CO2 atmosphere is a good start, at least you have pressure and rad protection. It is much easier to build a thick CO2 atmosphere. Just ask Venus :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DAL59 said:

Only one rotating city, for pregnancy.  

The pregnancy would last for 18..21 years until the embryo can buy alcohol and marry by himself.

The body finishes growing at 20..25 age.

5 hours ago, TheKSPBeginner said:

I'm sorry, for WHAT!?

E.T. detected.
Humans do not put eggs outside, they incubate them right inside the body. Funny but true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Antstar said:

Actually I was going to propose the same thing. Rings around the planet, made of superconducting magnets. Outrageous, but not impossible.

Here's the difference between our views. I think it is impossible because nobody can move the mass and provide the energy, control the dynamics etc. pp. And i still don't see how that works.

The fantasies i read deal with how to heat the core in such way that it starts working as a dynamo. Like blow up the planet with a doomsday bomb, connect a giant battery and heat it by resistance (duracell might sponsor ;-)), coil up a wire around it and send a current through it to heat the core inductively ... this sort of things. All more or less funny and fantastic.

And it still won't help to hold a thick atmosphere.

3 hours ago, Antstar said:

And a CO2 atmosphere is a good start, at least you have pressure and rad protection. It is much easier to build a thick CO2 atmosphere. Just ask Venus :D

There is not enough atmosphere, Mars isn't Venus. Maybe one could persuade the bound O in the Marsian crust to come out (*), but C isn't really there in quantity. The atmosphere is extremely thin. And the O, once released, will immediately start live out its tendencies to oxidise the place again afap.

(*) timelines and energies needed are handwavingly ridiculous.

Well, be it as it may. Colonization will remain a fantasy for the next couple of decades and probably beyond. Meanwhile hopefully moar data comes in the picture gets moar complete than before ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, there is more than a minimum of aluminium in the Marsian crust, you don't need to throw down pebbles from Phobos.

Just bring this:AlbaGallery3.jpg

and the mining stuff and all the industry and people you need to run it. And to use the raw materials it produces.

Aluminium anyone ? For a minimum price ?

Cheers with an aluminiumminimumimmunity :-)

Edit: the water in the background is only the artist's impression

Edited by Green Baron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Green Baron said:

Oh, there is more than a minimum of aluminium in the Marsian crust, you don't need to throw down pebbles from Phobos.

Just bring this:AlbaGallery3.jpg

and the mining stuff and all the industry and people you need to run it. And to use the raw materials it produces.

Aluminium anyone ? For a minimum price ?

Cheers with an aluminiumminimumimmunity :-)

Edit: the water in the background is only the artist's impression

Probably cheaper to extract it in space, what you call an aluminum drop on Mars . . . . . . .a bomb without an explosive charge. Good for dusting up those solar panels or occasionally upgrading the CEO who decided to settle on Mars.:cool:

You could make them into aluminum parachutes, of course they would have to be resmelted on the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PB666 said:

Probably cheaper to extract it in space, what you call an aluminum drop on Mars . . . . . . .a bomb without an explosive charge. Good for dusting up those solar panels or occasionally upgrading the CEO who decided to settle on Mars

They can put solar panels on a mountain and drop metals to its foot. Then pull up with ropes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, NSEP said:

 

before the question mark as a comma and three more zeros.

But you know if you build you facilities underground in tunnels potentially you can take care of 3 of the major mars problems at once, shielding, deep enough and its not to difficult to hold atmosphere, and also you are able to move freely laterally to transport. The only thing is you need from the start to be very good at forging drilling equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 100 000 000 000 USD = just 21 kharab USD
  • 2 100 000 000 000 USD / ~10 000 ~= 210 000 000 BTC.

Boring Company should found a Alaskan subsidiary: Cool Mining Company.
It would mine bitcoins in a cool place and give money for Mars.

P.S.
Later they can use the same equipment on Mars which is even cooler.
This will make Martian colony economically self-sufficient.

Edited by kerbiloid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, kerbiloid said:

Btw how should their flamethrowers work on Mars? There is no oxygen.

Either they are going to use some mixture which burns in CO2, or they are preparing for tunnel battles. Doom, Minecraft, Dwarf Fortress

The flamethrowers would carry their own oxygen.

Anyways, 2.1 trillion is way too low, considering its bassicly the same estimated cost of a Mars mission done by NASA, just to send 6 buddy's to Mars and back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NSEP said:

The flamethrowers would carry their own oxygen.

Anyways, 2.1 trillion is way too low, considering its bassicly the same estimated cost of a Mars mission done by NASA, just to send 6 buddy's to Mars and back.

2.1 trillion is too low for colonization, but a flags and footprints mission should only cost hundreds of billions, not trillions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/22/2018 at 3:30 AM, Green Baron said:

There is not enough atmosphere, Mars isn't Venus. Maybe one could persuade the bound O in the Marsian crust to come out (*), but C isn't really there in quantity. The atmosphere is extremely thin. And the O, once released, will immediately start live out its tendencies to oxidise the place again afap.

Does Venus have a magnetosphere?  While any colonization of Venus would be the last step in an excruciatingly long-term process (starting with teraforming), I'm curious if it is indeed possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NSEP said:

An old article, but this is what i based it around.

http://spacenews.com/op-ed-mars-for-only-1-5-trillion/

In that article it gives a ballpark estimate of the first mission costing 230 billion. One mission. 230 billion. Not trillions.

That 1.5 trillion estimate is for 9 missions, and it assumes that the vehicle is expended for each mission. Which is not likely. There are known methods to make reentry less demanding on the vehicle. A ballute system could do the job, making the transfer vehicle reusable and lowering the cost to less than a trillion for the program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Green Baron said:

Nope. She rolls along slowly on her path ... not enough movement in the core :-)

No foolin'?

Bit of a side-bar, but I'm curious: why all the atmosphere? Like, super DENSE atmosphere, isn't it?

Anyway, it seems clear, only the "cool kid" planets generate a magneto sphere . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...