Jump to content

RoverDude

Parts Hero
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,074

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RoverDude

  1. RoverDude
    Even better would be a PR Additional configs are pretty cheap.
  2. RoverDude
    There's no issue in alternate ISM configurations - but rather than changing the color it probably makes more sense to just increment the number decal. If you come up short, let me know (I can always make new ones).
  3. RoverDude
    tbh unless something in USI Tools is causing you grief (which I doubt, it is mostly part modules) then roll with it.
  4. RoverDude
    Pic of your GameData folder please
  5. RoverDude
    @DStaal - yep, since a 20 ton base part is twice as effective, the relative change should be smaller with a smaller efficiency part. Mass is the main lever, volume is the limiter. If you find a loophole, by all means let me know In theory, 20 tons of refinery should be the same regardless of whether it is one part or ten.
  6. RoverDude
    Log a ticket, ideally with a save, and I can see what's what Also a heads up - closing on a house tomorrow so I will be a bit out of pocket, but still around
  7. RoverDude
    Hey @DStaal as noted, everything is balanced by the constraint of mass and volume. Once you know the mass, we use this for e-multiplier. So a refinery with a total mass (including any costs for expanding, as well as machinery) of 10 tons would have an eMultiplier of 10. An efficiency part with a mass of 5 tons would have a multiplier of 5. The resulting efficiency on the refinery would be 150% (100% plus 5/10)
  8. RoverDude
    FYI - Catalog in my sig is fixed, and welcome @TheRagingIrishman and @TauPhraim to the USI Team
  9. RoverDude
    Ahh... I have an idea on why, will sort that
  10. RoverDude
    Sorry, not enough context on that one. Best guess is your hab reduced when the vessels decoupled
  11. RoverDude
    Yeah... that will do it
  12. RoverDude
    There's an entire KSPedia and Wiki covering all of this. Short version - drill for stuff. Refine to usable materials. Combine into stuff to make rockets.
  13. RoverDude
    As noted earlier, locking is fixed in an upcoming release. Also repeating what I said earlier... Locking is fixed in an upcoming release.
  14. RoverDude
    To be clear - Organics should not be an input, but they absolutely need to remain a required resource. Suggestion would be to lock them in the edge case where you have assembly and agriculture on the same vessel (a disconnected vessel would not have this issue).
  15. RoverDude
    Just have them use the ConstructionSkill
  16. RoverDude
    GitHub issue to allow moving machinery around but only for parts where logistics are enabled (i.e. not parts in general that may have converters - that's what maintenance does).
  17. RoverDude
    Locking is now allowed in the dev release, but having machinery move around in anything other than logistics containers would be very problematic. So feel free to log a GitHub issue
  18. RoverDude
    Or just use an engineer and perform maintenance... or have a workshop and an engineer That's good to hear
  19. RoverDude
    I'm surprised RO went with Kerbalism, tbh - given it's potential (and in some cases actual) impact on other mods.
  20. RoverDude
    Yeah KIS tends to eventually lead to forces that rip bases apart
  21. RoverDude
    Ok, going to try one other thing though it is a tethering change. Will toss you a test DLL
  22. RoverDude
    Yep now you see why I bundle it!
  23. RoverDude
    Time to violate the no memes rule, and post an 'Overly Posessive Valentina' meme...
  24. RoverDude
    Please provide the specific USI-LS version number from the .version file, or KSP-AVC. And take them for a stroll, If that fails, then get me your save file after they are back in the AC.
  25. RoverDude
    Did you launch them in a vessel? That usually resets things. And as asked, what version of USI-LS? Were the Kerbals originally launched from Kerbin? How did they get back to Kerbin?
×
×
  • Create New...