AlphaAsh

[quote name='amankd']so lemme get this straight, as im activly making a kk mod, they should work fine aslong as all the coliders are convex? so splitting the model into lots f small sections and making each a convex collider should work? [/QUOTE] Yes. And no. Multiple convex colliders present other issues. Even with precise alignment in Unity, KSP's physics tends to see tiny gaps between them. This makes this technique very tricky to get precision collision with larger objects such as runways. With overlapping, you get tiny bumps. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] [quote name='Thomas P.'] I submitted a pull request to KerbalKonstructs, that implements a fix for the colliders. More details are here: [URL]http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/105247?p=2307634#post2307634[/URL][/QUOTE] I'll take a look at this. Thank you sir.

[quote name='theonegalen']I also want to wish you all the best in your future gaming and modding endeavors! Thank you so much for all your work over the years, AlphaAsh![/QUOTE] Thanks. Don't worry though, I'm not done with KSP. I'm just done with trying to fix KK for now. It stopped being fun. [COLOR=silver][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] [quote name='comham']wow, thanks squad, you spipped up again and ruined the only mod that made kerbin feel like more than a spherical heightmap[/QUOTE] If you're happy to work within the new constraints on colliders, theoretically KK should still work fine with static content produced. Going over every asset in KerbinSide is just not something I'm willing to do and the reality is a lot of the assets need complex, concave colliders due to their complexity and size. Runways are a good example - you can't get away with a single convex collider because the length and width of such a collider ends up with mystery tears as far as KSP's physics is concerned.

[quote name='Tricky14']I'm sorry to hear that, it does sound like you need a break. A fair warning though. Fallout 4 is ridden with bugs, even by Bethsoft's release standards (their recent status update doesn't really do it justice). I help maintain a bug tracker and I don't really see them fix even a quarter of this stuff with the amount of patchwork they usually do. Not even before the year is out, just ever. Unless you don't mind jumping from the frying pan into the fire, I'd wait a couple months for the mod community to sort half of it out.[/QUOTE] The bugs don't really bother me in FO4 so far but then I've only played it for a couple of dozen hours. I'll probably worry more about Bethesda's shoddy support ethic when I start modding it.

[quote name='blowfish']I'm not trying to excuse Squad's doing this without telling anyone, but aren't there justifiable performance concerns for why all colliders in KSP should be convex, even if it requires more colliders?[/QUOTE] Nope. It's an archaic tech solution for a second-rate game engine. It's not Squad, it's Unity.

[quote name='Arsonide']The AddMessage thing is fairly straightforward to fix, there were also minor tweaks to PQSCities to allow them to fire events, which I'm guessing this mod utilizes intimately. If you shoot me a PM with the precise issues you are having, I'd be happy to help you work them out.[/QUOTE] Ola Arsonide. Take a look at [url]http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/82785-1-0-4-ON-HOLD-Kerbin-Side-%28v1-0-5%29-Supplements?p=2303950&viewfull=1#post2303950[/url] That's the primary issue. The AddMessage problem I can probably solve. Kerbal Konstructs does have some legacy module support but I've never bothered to expand it. All of KK's facility features are orphaned out to a GUI - no events involved. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] [quote name='amankd']are you going to try and fix it?[/QUOTE] Yes, I have tried to fix it.

[quote name='xEvilReeperx']Yes, apparently the mu loader is now forcing all MeshColliders to convex which causes Unity to recompute them if they're not already (hamfisted change for Unity 5.1 maybe? I read something about concave collider support being removed). This is causing the odd problems. Unfortunately, there isn't any direct way to prevent the loader from ignoring the flag inside the mu format that I can find. One solution is to hijack the load process, parse the mu for the correct value and set it back before the collider is recomputed... and yes it's exactly as ugly as it sounds. Here's my prototype which appears to work. Note that you must rename all affected mu's to muks, so for example ksairstripv24.mu becomes ksairstripv24.muks. They'll look the same as any regular loaded mu so you shouldn't need to change any configs. [spoiler=MuksLoader][code][DatabaseLoaderAttrib(new [] { "muks" })] public class MuksLoader : DatabaseLoaderModel_MU { public override IEnumerator Load(UrlDir.UrlFile urlFile, FileInfo file) { Debug.Log("MuksLoader loading: " + urlFile.url); yield return GameDatabase.Instance.StartCoroutine(base.Load(urlFile, file)); if (obj == null) yield break; using (var fs = new FileStream(urlFile.fullPath, FileMode.Open)) using (var mr = new MuksReader(fs)) { var topNode = mr.LoadNodeTree(); var meshColliders = obj.GetComponentsInChildren<MeshCollider>(true); var convexEntries = CreateEntries(topNode); if (meshColliders.Length != convexEntries.Sum(kvp => kvp.Value.Count)) Debug.LogWarning("Number of MeshCollider convex nodes does not match number of MeshColliders!"); // whoops there's a bug! foreach (var mc in meshColliders) { var url = HierarchyUtil.CompileID(mc.transform, mc.transform.root.name); Queue<bool> convexFlagQueue; if (convexEntries.TryGetValue(url, out convexFlagQueue)) mc.convex = convexFlagQueue.Dequeue(); else Debug.LogWarning("Failed to get convex flag for " + url); } if (convexEntries.Sum(kvp => kvp.Value.Count) > 0) Debug.LogWarning("Unused convex entries for " + urlFile.url); } yield return 0; } /// This is probably a pretty crap way of doing this but because there can be multiple GameObjects with the /// same url and a MeshCollider component, we won't be able to tell their convex flags apart if they differ... /// I'm assuming we'll get the same MeshCollider order out as was created, so we'll just keep a list of what /// was used in the order it was used in and remove entries as they're used private static Dictionary<string, Queue<bool>> CreateEntries( MuksReader.Node tree, Dictionary<string, Queue<bool>> dictionary = null) { if (dictionary == null) dictionary = new Dictionary<string, Queue<bool>>(); if (tree.HasMeshCollider) AddToDictionary(dictionary, CreateNodeUrl(tree), tree.IsConvex); foreach (var ch in tree.Children) CreateEntries(ch, dictionary); return dictionary; } private static void AddToDictionary(Dictionary<string, Queue<bool>> dictionary, string url, bool value) { if (dictionary == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("dictionary"); if (url == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("url"); Queue<bool> entries; url = url.Replace(" ", string.Empty); if (!dictionary.TryGetValue(url, out entries)) { entries = new Queue<bool>(); dictionary.Add(url, entries); } entries.Enqueue(value); } private static string CreateNodeUrl(MuksReader.Node from) { if (@from == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("from"); if (@from.Parent == null) return @from.Name; return CreateNodeUrl(@from.Parent) + "/" + @from.Name; } }[/code][/spoiler] [spoiler=MuksReader][code]public class MuksReader : BinaryReader { private enum DataBlockType { Node = 0, Finished = 1, Animation = 2, MeshCollider = 3, SphereCollider = 4, CapsuleCollider = 5, BoxCollider = 6, MeshFilter = 7, MeshRenderer = 8, SkinnedMeshRenderer = 9, MaterialSet = 10, TextureSet = 12, Light = 23, TagAndLayer = 24, MeshColliderTrigger = 25, SphereColliderTrigger = 26, CapsuleColliderTrigger = 27, BoxColliderTrigger = 28, WheelColliderTrigger = 29, Camera = 30, Particles = 31, } public class Node { public string Name = string.Empty; public List<Node> Children = new List<Node>(); public bool HasMeshCollider = false; public bool IsConvex = true; public Node Parent; } struct MuFlags { public int FlagRelatedToMeshRendererAndTextures; public string UnknownString; } public class MaterialTextureCache { private readonly Dictionary<int, List<string>> _textures = new Dictionary<int, List<string>>(); public void Add(int textureIndex, string textureName) { if (textureIndex < 0) return; Insert(textureIndex, textureName); } private void Insert(int idx, string textureName) { List<string> list; if (!_textures.TryGetValue(idx, out list)) { list = new List<string>(); _textures.Add(idx, list); } if (!list.Contains(textureName)) list.Add(textureName); } public int GetMaterialCount() { return _textures.Keys.Count(); } } private const string MainTex = "_MainTex"; private const string BumpMapTex = "_BumpMap"; private const string EmissiveTex = "_Emissive"; public MuksReader(Stream input) : base(input) { } public MuksReader(Stream input, Encoding encoding) : base(input, encoding) { } public Node LoadNodeTree() { var fileType = ReadInt32(); var somehowMeshRendererRelated = ReadInt32(); var unknown2 = ReadString(); return ReadNode(null, new MaterialTextureCache(), new MuFlags { FlagRelatedToMeshRendererAndTextures = somehowMeshRendererRelated, UnknownString = unknown2 }); } private Node ReadNode(Node parent, MaterialTextureCache cache, MuFlags flags) { var nodeName = ReadString(); var node = new Node { Name = nodeName }; if (parent != null) parent.Children.Add(node); node.Parent = parent; DiscardVector3(); DiscardQuaternion(); DiscardVector3(); while (PeekChar() != -1) { var nextBlockType = (DataBlockType)ReadInt32(); switch (nextBlockType) { case DataBlockType.Node: ReadNode(node, cache, flags); break; case DataBlockType.Finished: return node; case DataBlockType.MeshCollider: ReadMeshCollider(node); break; case DataBlockType.MeshColliderTrigger: ReadMeshColliderTrigger(node); break; default: IgnoreBlock(nextBlockType, cache, flags); break; } } return node; } private void ReadMeshCollider(Node current) { if (current.HasMeshCollider) throw new Exception("This node already has a MeshCollider assigned so something has broken!"); current.HasMeshCollider = true; current.IsConvex = ReadBoolean(); DiscardMesh(); } private void ReadMeshColliderTrigger(Node current) { if (current.HasMeshCollider) throw new Exception("This node already has a MeshCollider assigned so something has broken!"); current.HasMeshCollider = true; var trigger = ReadBoolean(); current.IsConvex = ReadBoolean(); DiscardMesh(); } private void IgnoreBlock(DataBlockType type, MaterialTextureCache cache, MuFlags flags) { switch (type) { case DataBlockType.Animation: DiscardAnimation(); break; case DataBlockType.SphereCollider: DiscardSphereCollider(); break; case DataBlockType.CapsuleCollider: DiscardCapsuleCollider(); break; case DataBlockType.BoxCollider: DiscardBoxCollider(); break; case DataBlockType.MeshFilter: DiscardMeshFilter(); break; case DataBlockType.MeshRenderer: DiscardMeshRenderer(flags.FlagRelatedToMeshRendererAndTextures); break; case DataBlockType.SkinnedMeshRenderer: DiscardSkinnedMeshRenderer(); break; case DataBlockType.MaterialSet: DiscardMaterialSet(flags.FlagRelatedToMeshRendererAndTextures, cache); break; case DataBlockType.TextureSet: DiscardTextureSet(cache); break; case DataBlockType.Light: DiscardLight(flags.FlagRelatedToMeshRendererAndTextures); break; case DataBlockType.TagAndLayer: var tag = ReadString(); var layer = ReadInt32(); break; case DataBlockType.SphereColliderTrigger: DiscardSphereColliderTrigger(); break; case DataBlockType.CapsuleColliderTrigger: DiscardCapsuleColliderTrigger(); break; case DataBlockType.BoxColliderTrigger: DiscardBoxColliderTrigger(); break; case DataBlockType.WheelColliderTrigger: DiscardWheelColliderTrigger(); break; case DataBlockType.Camera: DiscardCamera(); break; case DataBlockType.Particles: DiscardParticles(); break; default: throw new NotImplementedException("Unrecognized data block type: " + type); } } private void DiscardVector2() { ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); } private void DiscardVector3() { ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); } private void DiscardVector4() { DiscardQuaternion(); } private void DiscardBounds() { DiscardVector3(); DiscardVector3(); } private void DiscardQuaternion() { ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); } private void DiscardMatrix() { for (var i = 0; i < 16; ++i) ReadSingle(); } private void DiscardColor() { DiscardVector4(); } private void DiscardAnimation() { var numClips = ReadInt32(); for (var clipIndex = 0; clipIndex < numClips; ++clipIndex) { ReadString(); DiscardBounds(); ReadInt32(); var unknownNum = ReadInt32(); for (var j = 0; j < unknownNum; ++j) { ReadString(); ReadString(); ReadInt32(); ReadInt32(); ReadInt32(); var keyframeCount = ReadInt32(); for (var i = 0; i < keyframeCount; i++) { ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadInt32(); } } } ReadString(); ReadBoolean(); } private void DiscardMesh() { var entryType = (EntryType)ReadInt32(); if (entryType != EntryType.MeshStart) throw new Exception("Malformed mesh?"); var numVertices = ReadInt32(); var unknown = ReadInt32(); while ((entryType = (EntryType)ReadInt32()) != EntryType.MeshEnd) { switch (entryType) { case EntryType.MeshVerts: case EntryType.MeshNormals: for (var i = 0; i < numVertices; ++i) DiscardVector3(); break; case EntryType.MeshUV: case EntryType.MeshUV2: for (var i = 0; i < numVertices; ++i) DiscardVector2(); break; case EntryType.MeshTangents: for (var i = 0; i < numVertices; ++i) DiscardVector4(); break; case EntryType.MeshTriangles: var numTriangles = ReadInt32(); for (var i = 0; i < numTriangles; ++i) ReadInt32(); break; case EntryType.MeshBoneWeights: ReadInt32(); ReadSingle(); ReadInt32(); ReadSingle(); ReadInt32(); ReadSingle(); ReadInt32(); ReadSingle(); break; case EntryType.MeshBindPoses: var poseCount = ReadInt32(); for (var i = 0; i < poseCount; ++i) DiscardMatrix(); break; } } } private void DiscardSphereCollider() { ReadSingle(); DiscardVector3(); } private void DiscardCapsuleCollider() { ReadSingle(); ReadInt32(); DiscardVector3(); } private void DiscardBoxCollider() { DiscardVector3(); DiscardVector3(); } private void DiscardMeshFilter() { DiscardMesh(); } private void DiscardMeshRenderer(int muFlag) { if (muFlag >= 1) { ReadBoolean(); ReadBoolean(); } var num = ReadInt32(); for (var i = 0; i < num; ++i) ReadInt32(); } private void DiscardSkinnedMeshRenderer() { var num = ReadInt32(); for (var i = 0; i < num; ++i) ReadInt32(); DiscardVector3(); DiscardVector3(); ReadInt32(); ReadBoolean(); var numStrings = ReadInt32(); for (var i = 0; i < numStrings; ++i) ReadString(); DiscardMesh(); } private void DiscardMaterial(MaterialTextureCache cache) { ReadString(); var shader = ReadInt32(); switch (shader) { case 1: // KSP/Diffuse DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); break; case 2: // "KSP/Specular" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardColor(); ReadSingle(); break; case 3: // "KSP/Bumped" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardMaterialTexture(BumpMapTex, cache); break; case 4: // "KSP/Bumped Specular" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardMaterialTexture(BumpMapTex, cache); DiscardColor(); ReadSingle(); break; case 5: // "KSP/Emissive/Diffuse" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardMaterialTexture(EmissiveTex, cache); DiscardColor(); break; case 6: // "KSP/Emissive/Specular" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardColor(); ReadSingle(); DiscardMaterialTexture(EmissiveTex, cache); DiscardColor(); break; case 7: // "KSP/Emissive/Bumped Specular" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardMaterialTexture(BumpMapTex, cache); DiscardColor(); ReadSingle(); DiscardMaterialTexture(EmissiveTex, cache); DiscardColor(); break; case 8: // "KSP/Alpha/Cutoff" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); ReadSingle(); break; case 9: // "KSP/Alpha/Cutoff Bumped" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardMaterialTexture(BumpMapTex, cache); ReadSingle(); break; case 10: // "KSP/Alpha/Translucent" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); break; case 11: // "KSP/Alpha/Translucent Specular" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); ReadSingle(); DiscardColor(); ReadSingle(); break; case 12: // "KSP/Alpha/Unlit Transparent" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardColor(); break; case 13: // "KSP/Unlit" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardColor(); break; case 14: // "KSP/Particles/Alpha Blended" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardColor(); ReadSingle(); break; case 15: // "KSP/Particles/Additive" DiscardMaterialTexture(MainTex, cache); DiscardColor(); ReadSingle(); break; default: throw new NotImplementedException("Unrecognized value: " + shader); } } private void DiscardMaterialTexture(string textureName, MaterialTextureCache cache) { var texIndex = ReadInt32(); cache.Add(texIndex, textureName); DiscardVector2(); DiscardVector2(); } private void DiscardMaterial4(MaterialTextureCache cache) { ReadString(); ReadString(); var propertyCount = ReadInt32(); for (int i = 0; i < propertyCount; ++i) { var textureName = ReadString(); var propertyType = ReadInt32(); switch (propertyType) { case 0: DiscardColor(); break; case 1: DiscardVector4(); break; case 2: ReadSingle(); break; case 3: ReadSingle(); break; case 4: DiscardMaterialTexture(textureName, cache); break; default: throw new NotImplementedException("Unrecognized value for property type: " + propertyType); } } } private void DiscardMaterialSet(int muFlag, MaterialTextureCache cache) { var numTextures = ReadInt32(); for (var i = 0; i < numTextures; ++i) if (muFlag >= 4) DiscardMaterial4(cache); else DiscardMaterial(cache); } private void DiscardTextureSet(MaterialTextureCache cache) { var numTextures = ReadInt32(); if (numTextures != cache.GetMaterialCount()) { // stock mu loader errors out here if these don't match return; } for (var i = 0; i < numTextures; i++) { ReadString(); ReadInt32(); } } private void DiscardLight(int muFlag) { ReadInt32(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); DiscardColor(); ReadInt32(); if (muFlag > 1) ReadSingle(); } private void DiscardSphereColliderTrigger() { ReadBoolean(); ReadSingle(); DiscardVector3(); } private void DiscardCapsuleColliderTrigger() { ReadBoolean(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadInt32(); DiscardVector3(); } private void DiscardBoxColliderTrigger() { ReadBoolean(); DiscardVector3(); DiscardVector3(); } private void DiscardWheelColliderTrigger() { ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); DiscardVector3(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); } private void DiscardCamera() { ReadInt32(); DiscardColor(); ReadInt32(); ReadBoolean(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); } private void DiscardParticles() { ReadBoolean(); ReadInt32(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); DiscardColor(); ReadBoolean(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadInt32(); ReadInt32(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadBoolean(); ReadBoolean(); for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) DiscardColor(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadBoolean(); ReadBoolean(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadSingle(); ReadInt32(); ReadInt32(); ReadInt32(); ReadInt32(); ReadInt32(); } }[/code][/spoiler][/QUOTE] Oh ugh. That's kludgy. The easier fix would be for the devs to have their new code ignore anything flagged as Static = True in a config. If that shows up in 1.1 then I'll be very happy. Whilst your solution is appreciated, I agree, it's ugly. Too ugly though. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] [quote name='ModZero']On the other hand, I'd kinda expect Squad to [I]eventually[/I] support what this mod does. Probably not anytime soon, but it's a Historical Necessityâ„¢.[/QUOTE] I hope so too. However, considering the unmodability of the KSC, I doubt it'll be functionality that is exposed any more than it already is. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] [quote name='colmo']That sucks a lot. This mod has become a bedrock for many, and I was looking forward to it on my new rig. Thinking pragmatically, we know the colliders are busted. What still does work? Can we repurpose any of it, or break it up? Could we convert statics to parts?[/QUOTE] Theoretically I could go over every asset and make sure all colliders are convex. However, large static models tend to need far more complex colliders than parts, making concave colliders something of a necessity. They've never caused problems on statics before, which is one of the reasons this change is so frustrating. It just did not consider the impact on statics. IE My modding efforts have been ignored. Again. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] [quote name='CattyNebulart']*Hugs* Aww. I'm sorry to hear that. I was going to take a look to see if I could find the problem but I can;t even find the source. In the meantime take this donation in the hopes you come back to it in a few months.[/QUOTE] Thank you. I will get the latest KK source up on GitHub this week, so you're welcome to have a poke at the code.

[quote name='TaintedLion']I don't know the first thing about modding, but if someone who wasn't you managed to find the problem and create a fix, would you continue this?[/QUOTE] Yes. However, I'm fairly certain the issues are a result of changes to collider handling in KSP. That's some serious hard-code and considering the hacky nature of Kerbal Konstructs, I don't see a work-around. All I've been doing since 1.0.5 is try to fix the problems. It's not fun. I'm tired, fed up and Fallout 4 is calling me. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] I would like to add that I really do appreciate all the support I've had from the players of this mod. Even when I'm a grumpy old fart with a tendency to cuss out idiots. A particularly huge shout out to the mystery donater who just donated with a thank you. That is rare. I have something in my eye now.

[quote name='legendx']So that's it? No more updates?[/QUOTE] Unless KSP 1.1 miraculously becomes compatible, yes that's it, no more updates.

KSP 1.0.5 has some changed and new functions that have impacted the collision meshes of third party statics. I've not been able to identify exactly how or what and cannot even begin to diagnose the problem, let alone fix it. Kerbal Konstructs and KerbinSide is not compatible with KSP 1.0.5. That's all she wrote for this mod.

v0.9.5.0 of Kerbal Konstructs is available from KerbalStuff. It's fairly obvious that KSP 1.0.5 has broken Kerbal Konstructs, based on the reports I'm getting and more extensive testing. I cannot guarentee the stability of the mod at the moment and I'm struggling to track down these new issues. KK has always been something of a "hack" and what seem like unrelated changes to KSP have a tendency to impact KK more than they do some other mods that the API is better suited to work with.

v0.9.5.0 is available from KerbalStuff. It's fairly obvious that KSP 1.0.5 has broken Kerbal Konstructs, based on the reports I'm getting and more extensive testing. I cannot guarentee the stability of the mod at the moment and I'm struggling to track down these new issues. KK has always been something of a "hack" and what seem like unrelated changes to KSP have a tendency to impact KK more than they do some other mods that the API is better suited to work with.

Probably the runway too. I think I know what this is and I'll get a fix into the next update. Thanks for the report.

It's looking like Kerbal Konstructs, and therefore KerbinSide, isn't as compatible with the latest update as I initially thought it was. Those of you posting bug reports, I need a lot more information than I'm currently being given since I'm not seeing any of the recently reported issues. I'll try a recompiled release of KK this week and see if it's API changes that are causing the problems. - - - Updated - - - There's several operational facilities accessible through the Inflight Base Boss already. That includes fuel tanks. See the OP of the Kerbal Konstructs thread for more (slightly dated) info.

Can I get a screenshot of this? Kerbal Konstructs has no such status check. Is either your runway or launchpad at KSC destroyed? KK 'ghosts' these (as in the custom launchsite pretends to be either KSC's runway or launchpad) when it launches you at an alternative site.

Heya chap. There's a few statics in KerbinSide that could be re-purposed for such a job. I don't actually know which peak is K2 though. You got some co-ordinates or possibly a screenie from the tracking station to help me find it?

It is very much just a toy at the moment. I'm waiting on integrating the new comms features of KSP 1.1 before introducing optional features similar to RT, such as limitations on probe control and data transmission.

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/105247-1-0-4-Kerbal-Konstructs-v0-9-4-1-For-Justin?p=2231370&viewfull=1#post2231370

Not at the moment. I can certainly add a settings option for the next version.

KerbinSide provides a number of additional bases on Kerbin at which you can refuel and if open, will recover you if it's the nearest base.

I followed up on medsouz's efforts but kept running into dead-ends. I gave up.

Not a low level GPU I would expect you to see an FPS hit with KerbinSide content on top of all that. Think of each static building as perhaps 3-4 ship parts. Then imagine having maybe 10ish buildings on the screen as well as a vessel. So you're looking at maybe 40 more ship parts making drawcalls on the GPU. The beefier your GPU, the more drawcalls it's going to handle without sweating. The more stuff on the screen, the more drawcalls.

It is heavy on the RAM limit but shouldn't really strain a mid to high level GPU. You can alleviate some of that RAM hit by just grabbing the bits that interest you rather than Complete. Obviosuly, this will mean bases won't be nearly as complex however. I'd recommend just trying Skyways first and seeing if that suits you. Then maybe add some other packs.

Thank you for the feedback. I'm still re-learning 3D modelling - my skills are very out-of-date and I'm still too stubborn to put the time into learning Blender or UV mapping. I'm sorta waiting on when I have to for pro work as I just can't be bothered with that level of effort for a mod for KSP. Doesn't mean I don't respect the skills of those that do and don't recognise that quality suffers as a result. I just don't worry about it. If anyone downloads and uses any of my mods regardless of competing standards, then that's enough of a reward for me. Same thing does apply to IVAs I'm afraid. Too much work I don't want to do.

I'm taking a break from KSP at the moment to alleviate burn-out, catch up on some other games and give some attention to promoting and supporting Die Alien Scum! but I will make sure you get some proper endorsement and promotion for your efforts TOBG when I come back to KSP. May be a few weeks though.

Nice simple webpage now live. diealienscum.com. Make sure to look under the copyright notice at the bottom for... reasons EDIT - All content is SFW.