Alshain

That would only solve the gripes about not having procedural parts. It wouldn't satisfy the people that want the parts. Those people would still want the parts.

I am able to reproduce the problems with the Recap window. I will see what I can do about that. However, am not able to reproduce the same issue with the AppLauncher button. For me it turns off and on like a toggle. Is there anything specific you have to do first to make it behave that way?

Modular Fuel Tanks (On a phone, I can't link it)

Its not about difficulty with LS. It has 2 effects... A. It adds mass to craft B. It adds repettitive resupply missions to stations/bases. It adds nothing engaging to gameplay. A. Has no real impact and B is just tedium. It has nothing to do with making it more difficult, it has everything with adding nothing engaging and in fact the opposite. I don't care if they add it, but it better have a way to shut it off so people who want to do more interesting things don't have to deal with that nonsense burdensome 'feature'.

Did you see my edit?

Yeah, when he explains it, it does make some sense to me. I think it's just the perspective you look at it from.

Well the way it is phrased "active vessel dish" sounds like activate the dish, which is an option in RT, especially on the DTS or HG5 where always active in an atmosphere is not an option. I see it now but it is a little miseleading on first read. Perhaps this EDIT: Actually this would probably be even better

At one time it was possible on Minmus, but I think through the years it got changed.

I think 0.625 needs a fuller range of wing pieces before it can really be worthwhile. Also, a small radial intake. I tried to build a UAV and the thing ended up rather huge. You wouldn't even need much, just a few smaller wing pieces and an intake to make drone possibilities a lot better. Maybe if we beg @RoverDude, Making History will include a few parts to build an Altair. (That is part of modern history after all)

Now can you get him into orbit with nothing but his EVA pack?

Oh, well no rush. I mean it can wait till you have other things to release with it

Just for the sake of starting a discussion. I built this little craft to satisfy a tourism contract. When I launched it I got charged double because I was on the Probe Frenzy strategy. Now in my opinion, Tourists != Crew any more than passengers on a airline are crew. I had no control of the vessel without that probe. Thoughts? (P.S. I am loving this mod)

@linuxgurugamer If you enter the game until the app loads and then exit back out to the main menu, the icon is still present at the menu. It needs this to fix... public void Awake() GameEvents.onGUIApplicationLauncherUnreadifying.Add(DestroyLauncher); {

@NavyFish The app launcher button showing on the main menu can be fixed by replacing this: GameEvents.onGUIApplicationLauncherDestroyed.Add(delegate() { //appLauncherButton = null; }); ... with this GameEvents.onGUIApplicationLauncherUnreadifying.Add(delegate() { if (launcherButton != null) { ApplicationLauncher.Instance.RemoveModApplication(appLauncherButton); appLauncherButton = null; } }); The key is that "unreadifying" event. One of the old devs taught me that during the 1.2 Beta.

FYI, I just ran into this problem too. At a minimum you should add text to the mission control that specifies how it must be targeted IMO.

As long as you aren't on a console. If you are you have to look at an earth-like planet with no clouds and bad lighting effects.

I go back and forth, but if I'm playing career, it's heavily modded. New Tech tree, new contracts, new strategies. It's hardly the same game anymore. Stock career is full of nothing but tedium. The strategies are worthless, the tech tree is badly organized, and the contracts are usually so ridiculous (in the sense that while achievable, they serve no actual research value toward a real space program or manufacturer). I only started using Strategia recently, but I've found it to really work well for allowing me to choose my own direction while still having to be careful about that direction. Since milestones are one time only, you don't want to run off and complete all the Mun milestones while you have a Minmus project active (you lose 80%!). It certainly makes the game more interesting. There are several tech trees out there. I use CTT. I use the contracts for the various other mods I have installed (RemoteTech, ScanSAT, etc.) as well as a few of @nightingale 's wonderful packs (Anomaly Surveyor, Field Research, etc) and that helps to mitigate any need to complete too many of the annoying contracts from stock, other than the World's Firsts (which you also have to balance with your Strategia projects). There are lots of great contract packs out there, as long as I don't have to test an engine at 40km while traveling 100m/s. Those part test contracts are so stupid.

I don't know who told you that, but textures do not have to be loaded at a startup in Unity. In fact loading them in code based on a condition is quite easy. Squad currently parses through the GameData folder and loads everything, BUT they already have certain paths that are excluded from being loaded by the game at startup (PluginData for example) and a new one for cloud textures wouldn't be that difficult to create, and none of that has anything to do with Unity's decisions. It's all Squad. Worst case scenario, turning the graphic setting on or off would require a restart of the game to load/unload them. However there is no extra special "ton of work" that would be involved in stopping textures from being loaded. All the rest of the stuff involved in making clouds and such, yes that's quite a bit of work, but so is anything they implement. PlanetShine doesn't even use textures, that's light sources. I don't think DOE has any significant textures either. Now, I do agree the Minimum System Specs are set in stone. You can't sell a game to someone and then patch it so they can't play it afterward. However these kinds of things do not have to change the minimum specs at all.

That's a different issue. My issue is a single node execution on 3 different craft in close proximity (at different times). After the first craft is done, it deletes the execution on the other two craft that is supposed to occur 1 and 2 orbits later. I've been playing with RT for a long time and as far back as I can remember RT has never allowed execution of successive nodes on a single craft. (I wish it did, that would be nice).

@Murdabenne I'm glad you like it. I hadn't originally considered multiple installs, just multiple save games... but I think if I were to support multiple installs fully I could add a junction to the thumbs folder and a symlink to the subassemblies custom groups file. Maybe screenshots might be nice too. I'm don't use CKAN myself but I'm not sure mods are in the same scenario in that case, since multiple installs are often different versions. Or the mods themselves are the reason to have multiple installs. You seem to have a very specific setup there.

I've noticed a bug where if you have multiple planned maneuver executions on successive orbits (for example, your first satellite constellation) then after the first satellite finishes it's maneuver, RemoteTech deletes the planned executions for all of them, instead of just the one. Screenshots, here you see I have 3 satellites, the launcher that put them there has already de-orbited and now they just have to circularize at the proper time as you see in KAC. The first one is just 2 minutes from it's burn. After the burn, satellites 2 and 3 decided I didn't really want them to ever circularize, just hold the maneuver node forever.

You saw my post before my edit, but 17.7 works, 17.5 was crashing. I don't know why, but hey the latest works

@DMagic I'm getting a crash. It happens with both the 1.2 version in this thread and and the 1.3 dev version you posted above at startup. Crash Dump EDIT: Nevermind, that link was old. Helpful Github hint, always link to https://github.com/S-C-A-N/SCANsat/releases instead of say https://github.com/S-C-A-N/SCANsat/releases/tag/v17.5 That way, if it changes users will always see the latest version.

@Murdabenne Yes, precisely.

I just said I don't want both to disappear from the stock app launcher. Is there something you don't understand about me talking about the stock app launcher? I'm not using Blizzy's toobar. This is a request for the stock applauncher to have a setting to turn off one of the buttons. That's it!