Feradose

Go EVA and get your samples from your modules, and load them to your capsules/pods/cockpits.

Ive made a rollerskating bot, its legged but it doesnt use feet, does that count? Here it is!

Wait there are pulse detonation engines???

And their helmets should be bubbles

I think it simulates hydrogen fuel density really good, and should stay.. the only reason I dont use plane tanks on rockets for nukes. edit- maybe they even should add hydrogen as a resource and add a tweakable on tanks to make them hydrogen mode.

simple, her head got impaled with the dna sampling system, causing her to be kloned

It should also give us the .craft files of any exposed craft that we have all the parts for (but you probably would top the tech tree before going interstellar)

Definitely no, I wouldnt be able to keep myself from shaping minmus like a giant minty ice cream. If this is doable, then I support it.

Can anyone enlighten me about horizontal stabilizer lift? Horizontal stabilizers only affect CoM unless they are placed at an angle..? And KSC and runway is really visible at night, especially runway because it has these big lights that chop both my wings off in half. I completely agree with everything else you said, we need those and I need them Soon.

Oh my god thats horrible, I wish you luck and a good computer soon!

re-entry.. did it already go catastrophic?

You mean kerbin doesnt have any resources right? Will there be an atmosphere and intakeair? Ore? Gamma ray bursts could change the atmosphere really easily

If we can infiltrate and sabotage, then this system is the best competitive multiplayer system ever. Well done on this

Yeah. You found the Mass Eraser Drive. Fix.. dunno. Awesome? YES!

Just look at that monstrous mobile fortress! Good luck with that, circumnavigating Kerbin was hard enough for me, and you do it in the hell planet Eve, rep for you

But there is gravity in space! :cringe:

Destroyed science isnt recovered, so it isnt lost forever and you can do the same experiments again if your data gets destroyed.

I came to that conclusion after noticing the beauty of big craft, then finding out they dont drop my fps more than smaller craft and I thought, "thats harsher on processing, why is this still same?" then I realised it might be my GPU. Edit- I wish I had made the thread when I realised that. It would have saved me money and time.

I dont plan on getting higher resolutions because it (really) hurts my eyes as much as 800x600 does, I found the balance on this resolution, I might go to a higher resolution, but thats years away.

the resolution is 1366x768 max Intel i5-3340 @ 3.1 Ghz, and its fairly enough for me

Alright, my max budget would be 300$ my psu, I'll have to upen up the case for that I suppose. Do I want to play any other games? I already do and they are at moderate graphics too with 30 fps.

well I plan on playing ksp at highest settings with visual mods, and that should be able to play any games fine enough for me

You want the statuses of the each core? I can do that

This was a kerbal X launch

I dont think chrome/task manager and GPU-Z can take up a lot of processor power anyway so the graphs will be mainly KSP (again, only guesses)