-
Posts
1,749 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by FleshJeb
-
What do you think of the new water system.
FleshJeb replied to 322997am's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
I'm hoping we get an updated version of this: As far as I know, it's THE textbook for the old water system. -
That's cool!
-
Tylo VS Laythe VS Duna - To Kolonize or not to kolonize?
FleshJeb replied to Sharkman Briton's topic in KSP1 Discussion
I made the wacky decision to colonize Moho. I'm in the process of designing a Walking City that follows the solar terminator like the one in Kim Stanley Robinson's Blue Mars. The sidereal rotational velocity is only 1.29 m/s so it should be very doable. I may even do the Elcano Challenge with it. There's no practical reason, I just thought it was fun and very Kerbal. -
The new, longer jet engine models
FleshJeb replied to Red Iron Crown's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
I don't trust Squad to implement something like that in a coherent manner. They seem to have a consistent institutional blindness about the gameplay ramifications of their design decisions. I think your idea is bloody FANTASTIC, but I don't feel like beta-testing it for the next year. So, I offered a simpler solution. I very much appreciate your efforts. I'm still happily playing 0.25, and hoping (possibly vainly) that 1.1 will offer me enough incentive to upgrade. (I tried 0.90 and 1.02, and was underwhelmed by the quality.) -
The new, longer jet engine models
FleshJeb replied to Red Iron Crown's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
Instead of torque, just have it generate excess electricity if there are no active nozzles, or the active nozzles are not using all available power. It's a really simple solution. Consider me solidly in the "Three-separate-parts" camp. -
PSA: Do not Maintain an Active Flight for over 20 hours.
FleshJeb replied to G'th's topic in KSP1 Discussion
I'll post this again: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/98232-Colliding-into-building-3km-away -
Back to KSP, looking for a specific mod
FleshJeb replied to Barbouze's topic in KSP1 Mods Discussions
I believe you can make custom tabs in the part selector now. (I can't check because I'm still playing ver 0.25) -
Did it for a reddit "backwards SSTO" challenge:
-
Bob, just found this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gate_orbit
-
Cupcake for Valentina. He's like Jeb, but competent.
-
A solution to California's Water Crisis AND lack of jobs!
FleshJeb replied to fredinno's topic in Science & Spaceflight
I really want to use this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Plowshare To blow a 100-mile channel from the Sea of Cortez to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salton_Sea Where it could be desalinated by these: http://clui.org/ludb/site/salton-sea-geothermal-plants via this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_desalination OK, OK, we don't really need Operation Plowshare for this, but it IS very Kerbal. -
This thing needs a river or canyon. 237m Booster Bridge.
FleshJeb replied to Azimech's topic in KSP1 The Spacecraft Exchange
KSP needs the Stress graphics that BCS/pontifex has. -
I think this is my favorite KSP thread so far. I have a couple of points to add that haven't been mentioned yet. (And please correct any misconceptions I have.) 1. We can do a very similar analysis for returns from moons to parent body Pe's. 2. None of the analysis upthread applies to or accounts for Normal/Anti components of your ejection burn. 2a. Plane change burns do not get ANY benefit from Oberth. 2b. Plane change burns are least expensive at the lowest orbital velocity. 2c. The scenario that would prove this best/be a worst case-scenario, is a direct ejection to Moho. 3. The analysis upthread should still be valid for bi-elliptic transfers. 3a. The only Kerbin transfer that benefits from bi-elliptic is Eeloo, and this should also be in OhioBob's chart. 4. Jeb's Transfer: Gravity slingshotting a giant, overpowered, phallic ship named the Llewellyn Dowd off of Eve is STILL the BEST method
-
Need help with an orbital mechanic question!
FleshJeb replied to Der Anfang's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Gah! Thanks for checking my work! I didn't run the calc again, but I estimated with the exponents, and it should be 10^-11 * 10^24 * 10^6^2 = 10^25. Also the 1.77*10^9 was from the bad 10^27 number, ignore it. I fixed my typos. Speaking of which, I had listed the exponent of G as positive and not negative, so I fixed that too. Yes, I'm sure it was the rounding, I think I only used four or five significant figures. Clearly, I should not do science on 40 hours without sleep. Did the colors help? I wasn't sure if they'd add to the confusion or not. -
Need help with an orbital mechanic question!
FleshJeb replied to Der Anfang's topic in Science & Spaceflight
I grieve for our children's problem-solving skills... Der Anfang, you have to do the same thing to both sides of the equation to isolate the term you want. I'll do it in steps. Pardon my formatting: Original equation: T = (2*pi)*[a^3/G(M1+M2)]^2 Step 1, divide by 2*pi: T/(2*pi) = [a^3/G*(M1+M2)]^(1/2) Step 2, square both sides: [T/(2*pi)]^2 = a^3/[G*(M1+M2)] Step 3, multiply by denominator: [G*(M1+M2)]*[T/(2*pi)]^2 = a^3 Step 4, take cube root: {[G*(M1+M2)]*[T/(2*pi)]^2}^(1/3) = a EDIT: I'll solve it so you can check (with units): G = 6.67*10^-11 (m^3 kg^-1 s^-2) (gravitational constant of the universe) *EDIT negative exponent [T/(2*pi)]^2 = 1.41x10^13 (s^2) G*(M1+M2) = 4.04*10^14 (m^3 s^-2)(the kg cancels) [G*(M1+M2)]*[T/(2*pi)]^2 = 5.70*10^25 (m^3)(the s cancels) *EDIT typo in exponent cube root that big nasty mess above = 3.85*10^8 (m)(uncubed the meters) *deleted yet another typo That matches the listed value, so it looks like I did it right, within rounding errors. -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_Me_Joe
-
Torque. This is an excellent idea.
-
Mission to Tharsis on Mars or Valles Marineris
FleshJeb replied to fredinno's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Just like on Duna: Aerobraking and parachuting to the higher altitudes is hard. Curiosity is so massive they had to do the Seven Minutes of Terror landing. Valles Marineris is pretty deep and wide, landing there should be no problem, but I bet the terrain at the bottom is pretty chaotic. I was just about to suggest a drone airplane mission down the canyon, when I googled it: http://www.jmcgowan.com/marsplane.html The Tharsis Bulge, on the other hand? Hoo boy, that looks like a tough mission. -
That's really astounding! Have you ever considered seeking help for your KSP problem?
-
Since craft files are a tree structure, you could never make a 3D web. That said, this would be a very useful piece.
-
twr and max acceleration
FleshJeb replied to ForScience6686's topic in KSP1 Gameplay Questions and Tutorials
http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/Main_Page -
Play a tune with my instrument
FleshJeb replied to Azimech's topic in KSP1 Challenges & Mission ideas
Hehe: -
The Elcano Challenge : Ground-based circumnavigation
FleshJeb replied to Fengist's topic in KSP1 Challenges & Mission ideas
I somewhat accidentally did Minmus. I took my 25-ton armor-plated science rover out for a low-grav shakedown, and realized I was halfway around the planet, so I kept going. I only used one or two quickloads, but I did fix a heck of a lot of tires. Thanks to MJ, it was largely full-throttle and hands-off. I just had to be there to flick on the VTOL Vernors to cushion the landings. I had enough fuel left for the Vernors that I put it in Minmus orbit, and docked with a recovery/parachute tug. Bob made it back to Kerbin in one piece. I'm about 1/4 of the way around the Mun in a similar craft. Having a rover that can survive a 1-2km tumble at 20 m/s is a blast. No proof, No badge needed. I had a REALLY good time. :-D