Jump to content

Windspren

Members
  • Posts

    773
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Windspren

  1. This would be great, especially with lightning and auroras. To the people saying that this would affect performance a lot, I have an 8 year old laptop that I occasionally use for KSP, and with EVE with AVP Interstellar and 24 other mods, I get about the same FPS as without EVE.
  2. Yeah, that's a good idea. Maybe there could be an additional factor for tidally locked moons? Not sure what you mean on the second thing.
  3. Several changes to the category structure (sorry to double post, but this isn't getting any attention)
  4. Looks like your center of thrust is way too high. Move those engines farther back and place them so that they are even with the plane's wings.
  5. I added a few part mods and stuff. Can someone do this for 1.1, and does 1.1 allow for subcategories?
  6. I really like this idea, and it fits with having parameters of each celestial body be hidden until you take specific readings there.
  7. The developer of RealisticAtmospheres PMed me and told me that it works, but the landing prediction is more than 200 km off.
  8. It's worship! We sacrifice ships and kerbs to the Kraken in exchange for FTL!
  9. There's a mod for that. I'm sorry In all seriousness, we really do need this. It just doesn't make sense that you have to launch your kerbs inside a tin can rather than just have them drive out of the VAB/SPH in your Camaro replica.
  10. When are you going to remake the nuclear reactor models? I'm hoping it will be before 1.1.
  11. My only worry is that the Trajectories mod won't work with this.
  12. Do the various changes show up in the Tracking Station info?
  13. Well. That might be a bit too spammy for my tastes.^^
  14. If they increased prices, that would encourage other launch companies to start up and SpaceX would be forced to lower prices by the free market. This is why it's really hard to keep a monopoly on something. The article said that they were comparing the Ariane 64 to the F9. I think that they're building a factory which will make cheap WiFi sats.
  15. There are some pretty cratered parts of Minmus, especially on the side opposite of the Great Flats.
  16. It looks like an inverted-color Minmus. Maybe the Mun is also colored the opposite from the Kerbulan Mun?
  17. It said that Fabien is one of 40 kerbals in the universe... Val thinks there is 39 because Jeb "died". JEB LIVES!
  18. The radiation from the engines, even when not burning, would fry the Kermulans even from far away.
  19. Doesn't the Intrepid have several clusters of highly radioactive engines? They could just point them at the Kermulans, or burn at them if they are feeling particularly nasty.
  20. That post has a lot of inaccuracies. First of all, it is impossible to communicate information using entanglement, because the state of entanglement collapses as soon as it is observed. Second of all, physicists have not created entangled black holes. Finally, wormholes are still theoretical, and have not been created by entangled particles. That post looks like pure clickbait for people who are interested in theoretical physics but know very little about its fundamentals.
  21. Gravity does not rely on quantum entanglement, and entangled particles are not wormholes.
  22. You're really confusing quantum gravity. Quantum gravity is an attempt to merge General Relativity with the Standard Model, not some magic gravity entanglement force. In any case, a state of entanglement will collapse as soon as it is observed rendering it useless.
×
×
  • Create New...