Matuchkin

Landing also separates your spine from your pelvis. And your ribs from your spine.

It's just landing it that separates the men from the "carbon and meat"...

Weird how you named some of them. Apollo's chariot, for example, doesn't have 1000 horses, whose legs work at 15,000 gallops per minute. Apollo also doesn't feed his horses with alcohol and gasoline, and doesn't have a pit crew.

I haven't encountered any bugs at all in 1.1.x, and I see I'm far from alone. Is there a vocal minority in this, complaining against 1.1? Because I have seen more people than ever who dislike this game version, and yet this poll seems to disagree.

Crashes I had with 1.1.2 this month: 1 Crashes I had with 1.0.5 last month: 14 Overall 1.0.5-1.1.2 framerate increase: 3 times faster. Krakens seen in 1.1.2: none Bugs: nil I don't see the problem everyone else is having, or I probably have this "crap for stability" exchange going on with my computer.

1. Nearly all of the Russian spacecraft at the time had huge tendencies to miss their landing spots. 2. People didn't just carry guns in the Soyuz, like "this thing is unreliable, so I'm going to bring this gun with me for good measure". A TP-82 triple barrel pistol was put on nearly every ship. The upper two barrels fired 40 gauge ammunition, and were smoothbore, while the lower rifled barrel fired 5.45x 39 ammo. This armament came after Alexey Leonov landed in northern Siberia, and had a profound fear of the bears in the area. He made sure that the Soviet government provided astronauts with the TP-82- a half-shotgun-half-pistol, with not only shotgun ammo, but also pistol munitions of the same caliber as the AK-47. Essentially, it was an extremely powerful pistol, with surprisingly good quality.

Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bingo. Fuel. Bing- "Shut the hell up!" *Turns off alarm*

Accusing someone else of cheating by saying he's cheating? Cheater!

Vostok just had landings that were approximate. I was talking about Voskhod, which missed its designated landing area by hundreds of kilometers on its second flight. Soyuz, on the other hand, had parachutes that didn't work at all, cursing astronauts, and retrorockets that fired after landing, disintegrating the whole capsule.

Voskhod just had a stronger parachute that Vostok, and a tendency to land in the wilderness, surrounded by wolves.

Wait, how many of those spaceplane projects were by the USAF?

Oh okay. I forgot those guys had an influence.

NASA cancelling dyna soar.

Alright, let's get him, boys! WAITER! WAITER! OH MY GOD AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...

We need to make a HarvesteR moon around Eeloo.

Oh, then it will probably go somewhere in LEO, then barely fly again.

At this point, I expect this to end up like all other epic/ innovative space projects- in the scrap.

I don't understand. Are you that self-centered? You know this is a public pool, right? Not everything's made for you to eat, and not everyone is bound to be your waiter! Now get out! Waiter! I think my soup is passing its Schwarzschild radius!

I posted this on the wrong thread previously, so don't be confused if you see this there. I have two important questions to ask: 1. What will it be like to use H2O2+_____ as a bipropellant mixture in this scenario? I'm thinking of H2O2 and kerosene as a mixture- seems easy to get. 2. Where can one get potassium permanganate?

I have two important questions 1. How nice would it be to use H2O2+_____ as a fuel? 2. How simple is it to get potassium permanganate, and where can one get it?

One thing we need to fix this problem: Owwwwwwwwwwww...

JOE! GET THE BLASTER! CODE PURPLE!!! CODE PURPLE!!! Waiter! Do you use mechjeb?

1. You must agree with the terms and conditions before letting magic boulder into your physics loading range. 2. Do not talk about magic boulder. 3. You must install the latest version of adobe flash player to land on magic boulder. 4. Muffins.

Well I'm nice, so I'm gonna let Bill Phil answer. Wait, what... @NathanKell

DO I LOOK LIKE CAKE99!?!?!? @Atlas2342?