Matuchkin

You see, what we did is... *proceeds to explain how he put the guy into your soup, not understanding that that is the least of your concerns* Waiter! Is this broth, or is this UDMH?

My friend, you should play War Thunder on simulator mode. Other than that, I do not have many problems. I safely land all of my planes, and do not see any difference between 1.1.2 and 1.0.5.

This calls for a submarine dogfighting challenge.

Pix plox plax plux plex?

yay

Thanks for that. Hope I have my view here.

It's... It's beautiful...

Saying a poster is cheating merely because of his post's content is FILTHY CHEATING! [Bloody imperialists]

Auto Darude: When you open the game, you are instead redirected to the Darude Sandstorm music video on youtube. No volume options.

Looks very nice. Almost SPAAG-esque. I do recommend to just put them into a more armoured fuselage.

Oi. @NotAnAimbot. You got a PM.

EDITED OUT:

The Mavericks and Hellfires are not manoeuvrable. They dip down, then manage to pull themselves up but overshoot before they can get back on track.

Let me count: I think I emptied something like 50 rounds into it. Now I tried a hundred. As always, the chassis is completely intact. However, the wheel base is damaged beyond operation. To summarize: My chassis can live through most hits. However, the major weakness is the wheel base. I want you to try some stuff out on my tank. I'll message you with a kerbalx link soon. 1. I'm starting to have really big doubts. 2. Maybe you can fix the wheelbase problem.

Okay, @NotAnAimbot. I know my problem with the ATGMs. Instead of hitting the tank itself, they hit the ground directly below the tank. Now, the main chassis is not a problem, and is actually quite damn awesome. Every time the explosions settle after an ATGM hit, I observe that the chassis, though flipped, is completely unharmed and the crew inside is alive. All in all, the chassis looks great. The main problem: The chassis gets torn off of its own wheels. Cause? The wheel base is unarmored, and gets shredded every time. The main chassis remains untouched, but gets thrown by the blast. So now, I'm trying to armour my wheel base, and reinforce it. Anyway, here are the other test results: 30mm cannon: Amazing- no damage at all. Millenium: Same as 30 mm. Amazing. M1A1 Abrams turret: Huge explosion, but no damage other than heat. Hydra 30: Very good. I emptied half a Hydra turret on the tank, no visible damage. 50 caliber turret: No effect on the tank. Ricochets or does nothing. TOW Missile: Hits ground under tank. Destroys wheel base, but leaves the chassis with everything on it completely unharmed. AGM 114: No results yet. My missile turrets are horrible. AGM 65: No results yet. Same as above. Seems like I spent a whole lot on the chassis, but completely disregarded the wheel base.

Oh god. 1 ATGM hit makes my thing inoperational. It just does a backflip, then splits in half. What happened last test, then?

I'ma load KSP in just a sec, and look at my tank. Please stand by... By the way, @NotAnAimbot. Before I'll show you my stuff, I'll try to test my vehicle a bit more. My previous tests included single ATGMs, small amounts of Hydras, etc. How I build my armour: The front plates (all the front plates) get the most. I have a minimum of 5-6 plates, but usually end up putting 10. The sides usually have 2-3 plates of armour, to fend off lighter ordnance. The rear is usually unarmored. The reason for prioritizing the front of the tank is that the front is the side that is facing the enemy at all times. If it isn't, the driver is doing something really wrong, or doesn't know how to do static defense. Movement is not a priority at all, because the tank is made to be a standing wall. If one would want to use the tank for transport or moving combat, he would have to get a momentum start and drive into the battlefield at full speed. Though that is considered a serious misuse of the tank. My "tanks" are usually armed with dual Hydra pods. I prefer them most, because they have a high rate of fire, high damage, and very large capacity. They are also very small. That's all I know as of yet. As I said, I'm yet to complete a bit more tests.

I see you don't add crew to yours. Perhaps I should do the same, and remove some armament. Then my part count won't be in the 130s. What do you recommend?

Sorry for the delay. I don't have a company, I just make vehicles. What approach do you take on these vehicles? I see everything is lightly armoured, except for the front plate. How much can this vehicle take? I have two main vehicles, the GV4 and GV5. I'm gonna list everything I know about them as of yet. GV4: - Test 1. Took multiple consecutive hydra 30 hits to the front. External damage: none (front layer of plates absorbed hits). Internal damage: none. - Test 2. Multiple barrages of 30 cal rounds to the front and sides. External damage: Minimal (front layer of plates absorbed hits). Internal damage: none. - Test 3. Pending. GV5: - Test 1. Took multiple consecutive hydra 30 hits to the front. External damage: none (front layer of plates absorbed hits). Internal damage: none. - Test 2. Multiple barrages of 30 cal rounds to the front and sides. External damage: Minimal (front layer of plates absorbed hits). Internal damage: none. - Test 3. Direct ATGM hit to the front. External Damage: Moderate (front layer absorbed explosion effectively, so minimal damage to that. However, blast threw the tank into a wheelie, and the rear wheels were damaged upon impact with the ground.). Internal damage: None. So how about you? Would you post your own tests and match up? I'd just like to see how good my tanks are in comparison to others.

Well then there you go. I recommend altering the sentence a bit, considering that most mods people install are not graphics mods.

Nooooooooooo. Whaaa? What are you talking about, this is totally soup... [Joe I think we should give him back his money] Soup! There's a bowl in my waiter!

So Chuck Norris once threw a few pebbles into a lake and named them Hawaii...

The Earth is the projector itself... It's the guy with the question mark instead of a face. We're looking for him. He's probably the Argentinian who sabotaged the launch, killing himself.

- that is four-dimensional and is in a spherical Cartesian plane environment (not our usual cubic one).