Jump to content

TrainEngie

Members
  • Posts

    146
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TrainEngie

  1. So he's the founder of Volkswagen! Interesting... ... and also, I haven't noticed that alignment problem...
  2. I think Bill died over a hundred times testing out my failed fighter jets for the FAR BD Armory challenge by Wanderfound and SpaceplaneAddict...
  3. Maybe the science experiments and resetting experiments should take time, according to who is aboard the spacecraft. Probe Core, 10 sec Pilots, 8 sec Engineers, 8 sec Pilots + Engineers, 6 sec Scientists, 4 sec Scientists + Pilots, 2 sec Scientists + Engineers, 2 sec Scientists + Scientists, instant Scientists + Engineers + Pilots, instant Maybe this would make pilots and engineers contribute to science a little more.
  4. (insert random lack of sleep or low grades comment) I'm not sure how to design a proper fighter jet. I keep coming back to this challenge, only to find out the next 100 new TE designs don't work, and that clones of the F-15 don't work either. (excuse the narcissism)
  5. Nice! Very angular... As you know, most of our battle brothers are stationed in SPESS... ...allowing for multiple simm-utaneous and devastating deep strikes!
  6. Gets flying carpet Insert diabetes
  7. Actually, scrap the spinoff thing. We're fine this way. I'll get a new fighter jet... soon...
  8. Huh, didn't think of that class thing. Actually, I was thinking of: Allowing Adjustable Landing Gear (that's a major point) Requiring contestants to show proof that their planes can land safely (what's a fighter jet if you can't get your prized pilot back to base?) Otherwise it would be the same challenge with different engines.
  9. Aren't some fighter jets inherently unstable just to make quick turns? Oh, and btw, I'm going to make a basic jet version of this challenge when I get some free time (in about a week?)
  10. Those are the tightest turns I've ever seen. The P.112.9VL gonna keep 1st place for a long time...
  11. A Charon for Eeloo so we can gravity assist our way onto Eeloo. A big ring for Dres. Otherwise, Kerbol system is just fine.
  12. FAR and GC Monitor. I'd like to see how much RAM KSP is using so I can stop playing KSP before it crashes.
  13. Do you mind giving out the coordinates of the grass starting point for jet testing purposes?
  14. Kerolev FS-17 updated I'm so gonna lose... My plane can't stand the Hawk Moth in testing.
  15. Two questions: Why exactly do the bigger-winged planes have a higher turning radius? If 60 makes a plane a coward, does 1 or 15 make it more likely to shoot?
  16. This seems like a fun mod... now if it functionality with BD Armory...
  17. Whatever, let's try the Kerolev FS-17 I think it's too late; it was only made to fight the D-9.
  18. No problem. Also, I found a reason for those weird errors: I was using 32 bit Blender! I used 64 bit Blender (and I manually flipped the UVs) and I got this... IT's beautiful! You're welcome! Thanks for your hard work, sir! It's appreciated
  19. Well, I would like to request: Square 1.25 to regular 1.25 adapter (like the width of 1.25 fuselages, but square cross-section instead of circular cross-sections) Square 1.25, long and short (like the width of 1.25 fuselages, but square cross-section instead of circular cross-sections)
×
×
  • Create New...