-
Posts
5,763 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Posts posted by DDE
-
-
On 8/20/2023 at 7:56 PM, DDE said:
* given the effect on Luna-27, it would be logical to expect a Luna-25 redux, potentially scratched together from the more sophisticated test stands and spares, to be inserted into the program schedule, which would upset the number scheme
Early speculation of Luna-25bis as Borisov floats the idea of a repeat lander to the South Pole in 2025-2026.
-
9 hours ago, Space_Coyote said:
Not just an exclusive few...
Granted, the most populous nation on Earth is indeed "one of a few". The club hasn't become that much less exclusive, it's the players that are rising or falling.
-
15 hours ago, JoeSchmuckatelli said:
The more I look at it... The more I'm looking forward to CSkylines 2.
Yes, it addresses many problems of the original. But, like KSP1, I'd stick with the first one... and I haven't booted up my gaming laptop in well over a week.
-
Strong contender for silliest sport ever.
-
"Press this and we'll hear you"
Spoiler"I definitely should not stick my hand into this... however..."
-
7 hours ago, kerbiloid said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_frigate
Carrying a lead zeppelin.
-
Did the T-Rex's front limbs get... "revised downwards" while I wasn't looking?
-
The name of this fairly large and often controversy-embroiled corporation: https://crushmash.com/en/
Yes, it's entirely deliberate
And because it's rendered with two "a" in Russian, it gets pronounced CrushMush
-
Now you're thinking with portals.
SpoilerFelt like crap this morning and this cheered me up domrhow. Sorry that I had to share.
-
Space windshield not included
-
Progress MS-22, deorbited as planned
-
6 hours ago, K^2 said:
Unfortunately, the mission itself also became a political talking point, and people who used it as such clearly do not understand how these constraints impact mission success.
No more or less than any other space mission. It's been thoroughly forgotten until about two years back.
PR limelight is PR limelight.
-
5 hours ago, DDE said:
"Move fast and break things". You'll at least manage 14 times out of 45.
To quote a certain sniper on Telegram, Luna-25 wasn't just built by people who'd never built a planetary lander, the people who taught those people never built a lander either. They would've just barely caught the builders of Luna-24 and the various Marses retiring. A two-generation gap is combined with the desire to make every mission an overcomplicated Flagship-class because anything less wouldn't safisfy even formal funding criteria.
And I bet they also face a similar problem to the defense industry, who have such strict price controls for cost-plus comtracts that they have to either fudge the books to operate at above costs, or invent endless R&D that isn't as tightly scrutinized...
-
4 minutes ago, magnemoe said:
Waring don't let an cat watch itself in a mirror for an long time.
Or the guy who posted, my cat diapered then I found it and took it home, two days later my can came home, I now have two identical cats.Don't worry, one is a striped Kurilian bobtail, the other is some sort of generic Siberian cat with an utterly uniform coat and a fluffy tail with a white tip.
-
1 hour ago, Codraroll said:
I would think they have planned the program in advance, and that each mission is not dependent on the success of the previous one. Even before they launched Luna-25, they must have known there was a certain chance it would not succeed, and take that into account when planning the way forward.
Unfortunately, Luna-25 was the lunar landing demonstrator. Given that Luna-27 is supposed to land as well, preferably not as an impactor, Luna-25's failure creates a rather stark problem.
-
3 hours ago, SunlitZelkova said:
Do we even know if Luna-26 is going to be a thing now that this has happened? Or if it was even concrete at all?
Luna-26 is supposed to be* an orbiter, I don't see how Luna-25's failure should affect it, as opposed to Luna-27.
* given the effect on Luna-27, it would be logical to expect a Luna-25 redux, potentially scratched together from the more sophisticated test stands and spares, to be inserted into the program schedule, which would upset the number scheme
"Move fast and break things". You'll at least manage 14 times out of 45.
-
5 hours ago, K^2 said:
Completely 3rd hand info that originated from Telegram, so absolutely treat it as a rumor, but there's information that the orbit change burn lasted 50% longer than it was supposed to. I don't think I need to explain to anyone here what the consequences are if this is true.
Essentially, confirmed a minute ago. Complete loss of comms, presumed crash.
https://t.me/roscosmos_gk/10540
[Snip]
-
-
Indeterminate failure during braking burn to pre-landing grazing orbit (180x10 km). No further details available
-
Are the problems with SRB-based LVs and human rating fundamental or particular? Is it possible to build a crew LV using chiefly solid-propellant rockets?
-
NovelAI has recently introduced a nice feature which allows you to click on each world to see the weight/probability (?) of it and major alternative options AI was picking from.
This makes me wonder if it's possible for an image transformer to have an "Inspect" mode that allows you to see the keywords influencing the part of an image.
-
On 8/15/2023 at 9:29 AM, DDE said:
Got woken up at 7 AM sharp by a woodpecker having a go at the verge of the roof just outside my window. Well, probably not the bird itself, but the utter feline pandemonium that ensued. I've realized I'd heard the sound at least once yesterday, too.
OK, this is officially getting as good as an alarm clock...
-
6 hours ago, DDE said:
Lunar orbital insertion successful
The Russian press is absolutely illiterate: "Luna-25 enters the orbit of Earth's satellite"
-
2 hours ago, darthgently said:
Tired: Comic Superhero Multiverse Movie Script Recycling
Wired: Books
Spoiler
Fun Fact Thread! (previously fun fact for the day, not limited to 1 per day anymore.)
in Science & Spaceflight
Posted
Norway is building a border wall with Russia.
And it's not what you think.
Norwegian deer herds keep wandering over to the Russian side, and the Russian environmental authorities giddily send over detailed bills for all the eaten moss... which the Norwegian side honors (as best as it can given the current restrictions), but the costs merit a border fence at this point.
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6183457
Meanwhile, the Soviet-Finnish Deer Convention of 1933 fixes such payments at 0.05 Swiss Golden Franc per adult deer per day, but no such document exists with Norway.
http://docs.historyrussia.org/ru/nodes/138740-konventsiya-ob-olenyah-mezhdu-soyuzom-sovetskih-sotsialisticheskih-respublik-i-finlyandskoy-respublikoy-gelsinki-4-iyulya-1933-goda#mode/inspect/page/4/zoom/4