Alphasus

The extra VRAM should help out quite a bit, and the r7 370 has less VRAM. KSP visual packs require VRAM, and 4 go should be sufficient. Actually, PSUs are most efficient at 50-70% of maximum load. So excessive wattage does help, even if slightly. That also applies to lower quality PSUs. Finally, he has some headroom to upgrade with that system.

The i7 offers hyper threading over the i5-6600k. It can act like it has 8 cores, which would in theory, bossy 1.1 performance quite a bit.

So, if you don't care about video card manufacturers, I'll go for the best deal here. This link is for a low end $800 build. It will run anything in KSP that you throw at it up to just about 700-900 physics intensive parts without visual packs(I compared it to my CPU and found the performance gap).That skylake i5 is faster than the haswell refresh i7 in single and quad core performance. That i5 also should do quite well with multithreaded physics calculation. This is the $1000 variant.Here That is a tad over budget, but it will be faster in CPU tasks. It will run multithreaded KSP about 50% better, and it has an improved GPU by far. It has a higher TDP, but the same amount of RAM. The $1000 variant will run overall faster, with a serious improvement in FPS for KSP, along with max part count.

I have a few questions. First of all, should I get a 4gb gtx 960 or a 2 gb gtx 960? The 960 is the only option because of the lower tdp. And second of all, is an i3 4170 faster than an i7-4770hq? My desktop will have the i3, but my laptop has the i7. So, which would run KSP better, and which will run games like War Thunder faster? The most intensive games I look to run in terms of cpu are KSP and possibly Elite:Dangerous. The GPU intensive games, in relation to the first question, are Need For Speed 2015, War Thunder, and Cities:Skylines. Will 4gb of VRAM help me run these games faster?

He left because of the deletion of rocket builders, and states this here: [url]http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/140238-Letter-of-Resignation?p=2309884#post2309884[/url] He felt that its deletion was a "personal attack" on him.

Strategy

Will everything be saved that isn't in rocket builders, e.g. threads? If so, then should I start my repository or not?

We have lost a great friend and contributor in zekes. May the drekevak rest in peace.

All of those! 1. Went to maui. 2. Have built a few star wars replicas 3. Toured an aircraft carrier.

[imgur]CsGAc[/imgur] This fighter is fast and light, with a high thrust to weight ratio and twin missiles. It is modeled after the fighter from star wars episode 2(does not come with r2 drone), the Delta-7 Aethersprite shown here: [IMG]http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/7/79/Jedi_Starfighter_EpII.png/revision/latest?cb=20150722030412[/IMG] The Kelta-7 is at the top. Download link:[URL]http://www./download/tv4qcmn9zd7vtw4/Kelta-7_Aethersprite.craft[/URL] Action Groups [TABLE="width: 500"] [TR] [TD]1[/TD] [TD]Toggle LV-N Nuclear Engine[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]2[/TD] [TD]Toggle Gigantor XL Solar Panels[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]3[/TD] [TD]Detach 1 Missile[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]Detach Other Missile[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE]

How can I embed images in the new format? I want to make a backup post as a repository or master builder thread.

They shouldn't, no. The forum games wont be removed.

Interestingly enough, I've seen a lot of conflict in the spacecraft exchange too, as RevanCorana and other replica builders will tell you. Trolls will log on and criticize everything. I think Columbia had his b-17 treated the same way

So, will I be able to take my old crafts and host them on a showcase thread?

I have an 81 part ship, but it uses nuclear engines and has nonexistent armor. It also has 2 of the deadliest guided missiles that I have ever made.

Go advanced and edit it.

Nope, there is only one node attach left, if you think super optimistically. And embedded, non exposed I beams aren't that effective at all.

The blade's missiles are in no way anti capital. They have low impact heads, and low thrust propulsion.

[url]http://pcpartpicker.com/p/xKBtZL[/url] Is this a good computer for playing 1080p games like Project C.A.R.S. and War Thunder? Of course, it would also need to run ksp rather well. It would need to run Project C.A.R.S. and war thunder at high, preferably ultra, as well.

Thanks!

Could you also delete this thread please: [url]http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/139633-SAP-C-ADF-Swiftwing[/url] Thanks in advance!

[imgur]DlJv0[/imgur] The Swiftwing is an air dominance fighter, with amazing maneuverability. She is very unstable, but very fast. Her maneuverability is so great that you have to feather the pitch up key in the corners, because otherwise she can flatspin. With 3 engines, twin panthers and a whiplash, she can easily outrun enemy fighters. At her maximum speed of mach 2.75 in the upper atmosphere, she can even intercept most high speed bombers. With a low stall speed of 50 m/s, the Swiftwing is exceedingly maneuverable. Be careful upon takeoff, and make sure to engage the panther engines to keep the plane mostly stable. At low altitudes, her speed is limited only by heat capacity, and with a rather long fuel load of 1.5 hours at altitude with full throttle, she can patrol for long periods of time. Of course, she can also go for maximum speed and hit mach 4 at medium altitude. [TABLE="class: grid, width: 500"] [TR] [TD]Name:[/TD] [TD]Swiftwing Air Dominance Fighter[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Max Speed:[/TD] [TD]Mach 4 at 10000-18000 meters[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Max Altitude:[/TD] [TD]25000 meters[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Armament:[/TD] [TD]4 Missile Racks, 1 Vulcan 20 mm cannon w/ 1 ammo box[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [TABLE="class: grid, width: 500"] [TR] [TD]Action Group 1:[/TD] [TD]Toggle JX-4 Whiplash[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Action Group 2:[/TD] [TD]Toggle J-404 Panther[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Action Group 3:[/TD] [TD]Toggle Mode of J-404 Panther[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Action Group 4:[/TD] [TD]Next Weapon[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Action Group 5:[/TD] [TD]Fire[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Action Group 6:[/TD] [TD]Release Chaff[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Action Group 7:[/TD] [TD]Release Flares[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE]

Oh, I was confused. Sorry. The names didnt tip me off i guess.

Planes!

What tonnage on those ships? I have a few apophis-class torpedo ships at 35 tons that would like to have a word with you. Or rather, their Theseus missiles would.