swjr-swis

Hace tiempo que no uso CKAN, pero si no recuerdo mal, CKAN guarda en su configuración los directorios de las instalaciónes de KSP que has usado, y por defecto asigna una de ellas como la 'principal' para usar automáticamente cuando lanzas el CKAN. Si no quieres que haga eso (o si prefieres que te pregunte siempre al principio qué instalación usar), necesitas cambiar esa configuración. Lo puedes cambiar mediante 'File->Select KSP Install...'. La 1.2.2 quizás no la tienes en la lista todavía, tendrás que añadirla mediante 'Add new', y si quieres que inicie directamente con ella, asegúrate de seleccionar 'Set as default'.

My guess: I think the order is set by the internal number it gives hangars when first created, similar to the numbers it assigns craft as they are first uploaded. Which would mean that changing the name won't reorder them, but you could delete and remake hangars in your newly desired order for it to 'take'.

@katateochi While testing, I think I may have found a tiny bug/nuisance of the KerbalX Mod: Normally, once you have logged in with the mod once it will store the KerbaX.key and use that information to log in automatically next time the game is started. However, when switching back and forth between KSP versions 1.2.2 and 1.3.0, it forgets its cached credential information and forces me to login again at first game load. This only happens the first time after starting the different version: start 1.2.2 - KX Mod asks to log in start 1.2.2 - KX Mod uses cached info start 1.2.2 - KX Mod uses cached info start 1.3.0 - KX mod asks to log in (!) start 1.3.0 - KX Mod uses cached info start 1.2.2 - KX Mod asks to log in (!) It seems as if having logged in with one version immediately invalidates the cached credentials of the other. It's not a big issue, I only noticed it due to working on two projects that required me to use different KSP versions, which I don't really expect to happen all that much. But I figured I'd mention it to you, in case it was some easy fix.

Green. This is on Firefox.

Have you tried reload on the page, directly after (auto)saving? Seriously, try it. The same with the bigger thumbnail on the craft page listings. You need to force a new request for the page, because otherwise it (not sure if the browser or the webserver) will think there is no change and the new thumbnail will not be fetched and shown.

I just tried three separate times again... it works. You may need to reload the pages where the thumbnail shows for the image to update... but it does change.

When you 'Edit Craft' on the page in question, the chosen thumbnail image is shown as a smal icon in the top, right next to the button to add a 'Description' container. Clicking on the icon will let you select one of the other images on the page (or of the albums) as a new thumbnail and listing image.

Es posible que la intención sea de practicar el lenguaje, creo que vale la pena animar el esfuerzo. Además, añade vida al subforo.

You already have the stock answer. Since you also asked about mods: Haystack Continued (last built for 1.2.1, but it's reported to work for 1.3.0) It doesn't hide, but it allows you to pick a ship to switch to from a list There is (was?) one other mod with similar functionality, VesselSwitcher I think the name is, but I can't find its thread.

Es que en español las explosiones son más ruidosas, así que nos tenemos que concentrar!

I just tested it (got a few downloads, tried all buttons and windows, uploaded a craft)... I got no errors and all seems to work as expected. It probably does not have localized texts though if you use KSP in something other than English.

My full stock version of the DuoRacer: https://kerbalx.com/swjr-swis/DuoRacer-1 Was a nice challenge to build an odd craft as close to the concept as possible with only stock parts (and I needed to test uploading with the KerbalX mod in 1.3.0 - it still works). I think she flies nicely too, though once the afterburner goes on, fuel runs out fast (can be solved by clipping a few mk0 tanks in, but watch the balance). Pics: Full album: http://imgur.com/a/kb7GO

When you type the '@' followed by the first letters, a dropdown menu should appear, narrowing down as you type more letters. You need to actually click on one to make it embed the linked name.

Tja, we lezen en schrijven met z'n allen 'gewoon' engels, en losse draadjes aanmaken die in de wirwar van International wegzinken helpt niet om meer nederlands/vlaams te ontlokken. Zonder een apart NL/BE subforum is een draadje zoals dit, waar men zich voorstelt of vraagt of/waar er meer is te vinden, zo'n beetje het meeste wat je kan verwachten. Kijk maar naar alle andere talen die hier zijn opgehokt. Zelfs duits is slecht vertegenwoordigd, ondanks de toch relatief grote subgroep gebruikers. Maar goed, zo nu en dan zien we hier een nieuw iemand 'uit de kast komen' en hoi roepen. P.S.: het was waarschijnlijk ook enigzins contraproductief om het draadje met een engelse titel te starten...

@michal.don It's a bit hard to compare two posts of several pages long each. Have you changed anything from the V4 challenge? Tweaked rules, other challenges?

Here's my attempt, PassengerRocket1: Base score: -(65350-52289)=-13061/64=204.078125 - Hands on (pure stock, no autopilot mods) - Gentle curve (entire flight is done without manual steering) Final score: (-204.078125*94*100)/100000=-19.18 Craft file: https://kerbalx.com/swjr-swis/PassengerRocket1

Ok that makes sense, I had not considered something already waiting in Minmus orbit. Tip: those docking ports can be surface attached to the RCS/LF tanks, leaving the 2.5m stack nodes on top and bottom of that section 'free' to be used for 2.5m decouplers. Best of both worlds: you still get to use the strongest joints over the whole length of the stack, and you get the docking ports to reuse the RCS/LF tank module. I uploaded a 'B' version of the craft with those changes. https://www.dropbox.com/s/lyons0lbumfj0ux/MimusHabitat-Launcher B.craft?dl=0

I grabbed the craft file you posted, retouched it a bit, and did a few launches up to LKO and to low Minmus orbit; no unplanned disassemblies happened. https://www.dropbox.com/s/8j76z896t3y5de6/MimusHabitat-Launcher.craft?dl=0 Changes made: I had to hand-edit the craft file to delete the KER module, or I couldn't load it in my stock game. First removed all struts and all autostruts, to remove any random elements. Redid the fuel lines for a bit neater placement (not really needed but OCD kicked in). Reoriented the 8 east/west docking ports so their tops were properly aligned (again, just an OCD thing). Placed regular struts in 2x symmetry to stabilize the SF/LF boosters. Placed regular struts in 4x symmetry between the RCS tank and the bottom 'docking arms' of the payload, to better hold the bottom of the payload. Placed regular struts in 2x symmetry between the top Jr docking port and the fairing, to dampen the payload swinging. (1) Placed regular struts in 4x symmetry in the two gaps of the center stack, to undo the weakness of your chosen links there. (2) Enabled autostruts on a few parts, but made them point to 'root' instead of 'heaviest', for maximum leverage and to stay where they are from beginning to end of the ascent. (3) Needs a bit of trickery. I used two cubic struts attached at the bottom of the fairing and offset to a bit above the top of the docking port, then the struts from port to the cubic struts, offset the cubic struts to outside the fairing top, then grabbing the fairing bottom to pull it off the rocket and simply replacing it in the same place - struts get reconnected to the inside of the fairing shell. Deleted the now unnecessary cubic struts. I don't understand these gaps, they severely weaken your rocket. Why not use regular 2.5m decouplers there to use the much stronger 2.5m nodes for the entire stack? Since you don't have designated 'heaviest' parts that remain the heaviest throughout all stages of the rocket, the autostruts get pointed elsewhere with every staging/decoupling event. This will cause problems. So to avoid this, I pointed them at root, which stays the same all the way. Also, there were too many of them; just enable them at the ends of stages/stacks. P.S.: It is still unclear to me how the payload is supposed to work. There's propulsion enough to get it to Minmus orbit and even to descend to the surface. I can also see it's meant to be 4 separate modules, to get on the surface with their wheels and probably docked to each other 'sideways'... but I can't see how you plan to actually land each of them safely and properly oriented on the surface - they have no propulsion of their own, not even RCS.

Which does not help with removing the actual data the OP is worried about being leaked if the forum is hacked. @SKGaming, a slightly more helpful solution to your request, and one which you have under your own control: In your account settings (top right, click your user name for the menu), you can change your password (left side, third item) to some randomly chosen string. Same place, second item, allowd you to change the e-mail address to some throwaway address. Finally, you can reply in the Name Change thread and ask for your forum account to be changed to something randomly chosen (if you have never done this before). This should remove all three of the items of information you want 'cleaned', without 'breaking' the forum and its links.

I got "Panda Aerospace .craft". This was on Windows 8.1, Firefox 54.0.1.

Could the problem be caused by the double-quotes in the name of the craft? It looks like the name is cut off right at the point where the first one should be.

Not sure you would in fact 'like' this as much as you think: having more than a handful of craft on the KSC terrain can make launch, flight, and/or landing very laggy activities, and some craft could even spontaneously jump, disassemble and explode when passing near them. That said: Kerbal Constructs made the fuel tanks actually have a function, although I'm not sure it is what you are looking for (you may also need Kerbin Side, not sure):

You could do this with stock parts: - add enough sepratrons for a >1 TWR, and make them stage first, and the main engine second. Depending how light of a missile you want to do this with, it might even be possible with just (a) decoupler(s).

We keep thinking of them as one big organism, but what if they are actually huge colonies of single-cell critters? A form of highly organised plankton that used to live in the waters of Kerbin, retaining vegetative photosynthesis capability in (expected) low-food conditions. In times of nutrition excess (snacks!) they can afford to wildly splurge energy on flexing their muscle-proteins to move the colony about, and when food is lacking -or to save food they'll need much later- they revert back to a vegetative condition where photosynthesis is all they need to survive. Given a proper medium (eg. a fluid-filled compartment or space suit) they could even decide to break up into smaller clumps or down to single-cell to maximize light absorption, and reclump later into the multi-cellular active forms we know. It would explain how they can survive hundreds of years marooned in space in their suits or ship (fragment), or while waiting to enter Eloo SoI. It would also explain the poofing as a last-ditch life-preserving measure in which the energy of the would-be-catastrophic collision/combustion gets diverted into an almost instantaneous endothermic breaking of the bonds that hold the colony together... dissolving the kerbal into a cloud of billions of frozen 'spores' that blow apart, fading into invisibility to the naked eye. Which can later reconstitute themselves, explaining how previously 'lost' kerbals reappear again after a bit of time. Then again, it could just be 02:32 AM and my brain is running out of ideas of how to get me to go to bed already...