Jump to content

JoeSchmuckatelli

Members
  • Posts

    6,311
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

8,316 Excellent

6 Followers

Profile Information

  • About me
    The Most Famous Marine Who Ever Lived
  • Interests
    Early Access? Yes Please!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I think that would be true for a point light source. However, given that the sun is much larger (and despite the distance) we almost have to assume that the penumbra might actually lightly shade inside the actual diameter
  2. Is the shadow of the moon on earth during an eclipse smaller in diameter than the moon itself? I'm thinking it would have to be, given that the sun isn't a point light source.
  3. So cool that people can and will do stuff like that! ... I'm aware that the "move fast and break stuff / best part is no part / only put stuff back on when it no longer works" ideology incorporates events like the last two failures, and that from failure can come success. So I'm hoping we hear from SX or some of the deeper diving watchers about what the likely problem is and how they will overcome the engineering challenges. That's the interesting stuff. The only question in my mind is whether the fast pace of construction has 'baked in' problems. From a public relations standpoint it would be better for SX to figure out this aft-fire-RUD thing before flying again. However from a sunk cost / get info from what you have standpoint - it might actually be better for SX to fly a faulty-but-already-built ship to scrap in the ocean rather than send it to the yard for disassembly.
  4. Big rocket, maybe? After looking at that ship and thinking about rockets that occasionally tip over... This one looks like it would be cheaper to repair in the case of an impromptu structural overhaul
  5. The extremes of both sides are idiots. Also - I might remind folks, that while history doesn't always repeat it does quite often rhyme. We've been through this kind of thing before. We will muddle through again. [snip]
  6. I'm Gen X and I teach Gen Z. The kids are alright. The screaming polarization of Millennials and Boomers (both within the individual groups and between the polar opposites of each group with the other) is annoying. It's like being a guest at dinner when a family fued breaks out. Each participant in the fued wants to cozy up to us while pointing out their opponents are insane.
  7. I get that - but... ...at least in that video I'm not seeing much in the way of "pretending there's a tower". I do see a neat, controlled landing on the water.
  8. I've said this before - but I remain impressed that they are practice landing that close to a prepositioned camera. Indicating that the reentry is pretty much on target. That said - there is not much lateral transition. Basically if you just go off the above video and imagine a tower - they'd pretty much have to scrape by it. Suggests that when they go for the tower catch things could get interesting.
  9. I thought the same. Also - if the thing is supposed to be sekret - why publish a photo that says 'here I was!'
  10. Wow Thanks! So - is there a time frame for 'coming up' when we can look for an update on whether the Bennu-Tea has the six 'missing' amino acids? Great panel discussion, btw! I'm also curious about the similarities to the JAXA samples - was that expected or surprising? Did they get a similar wet environment signal or did Bennu have a different history?
  11. That Edited Image - cannot catch both Booster and Ship without dismounting Booster... (Sez they guy who thinks the tower isn't tall enough for that!) Interestingly - starting at 1:52 of that video - where Booster is just about to light the landing burn - you can see they're already venting gas from the place we got all concerned about venting burning gas. It of course ignites. Seems to me to be part of the plan - as it's coming from a vent.
×
×
  • Create New...