DirtyVenomSteam

Any plans for engines based off the Fw-190 or the Me-262? If so, I'd be glad to provide proper reference pictures, either from War Thunder or just digging around on google.

If you're taking suggestions, I have an idea for an adjustable Junkers 87-styled gear, as it'd make historically accurate recreations much easier (As well as make the much better looking) Here's an example image of the gear. Hopefully it's possible, I'd love to assist this mod in growing. Keep up the great work, thanks bunches for keeping this awesome mod going.

I just speak it, not much, though.

Mein gott, you're a genius.

So, has anybody else taken up the mantle on this yet, or are my realistic replicas forever doomed to have inaccurate wings?

Spanner's becoming the new LinuxGuruGamer, a god of revivals and continuations.

May want to fix the CKAN repo, as it lists an old version as compatible at the moment.

#1 rule of KSP Forums; No asking for ETA's, as modding is a long and difficult process, but, we can only hope there'll be one soon.

It comes with a modified version of the Kerbalfoundries caterpillar tracks for use with the AFV's, the original Kerbalfoundries continued thread can be found Here. Glad to help.

If you're taking suggestions, something I believe would be very useful, as recommended by KerBlitz Kerman is procedural cargo bays and crew storage, a procedural ventral Mk3 bay would be extremely useful as well, overall I just want to thank you for maintaining this awesome mod and doing your best to keep it goin'. Cheers.

Can hardly wait to crush ruskie and american tanks with Glorious german vehicles. Also, any chance of a tutorial on how to add texture changes in the .cfg files? I made an alternate tex for the Abrams hull and turret, but, it doesn't seem to have anything for the textures in the .cfg file.

Question, are the Sherman and Tiger hulls/turrets released yet, or are they still indev?

Any chance you're also releasing that sweet AH/MH-6 at some point?

Or better yet, at the end, nothing drastic, just a small ramp to help you get into the air so you can be extra sure your Kerbals are gonna die.

What I honestly think is we should have multiple launching areas (KSC2, for instance as a secondary one). It'd be rather simple to just ask the developer of Kerbinside for the source code so it can be something proper.

I have no idea where to post this, so I'm posting it here. A while back (~2014/2015) I was permanently banned from the Steam Forums for KSP, just because I simply talked about the people that where openly pirating the game. (I used to have a few of them on my friends list, they where very rude people.) and I was wondering if that, since I've purchased the game since then, I could be unbanned from the Steam Forum for it so I can make guides, as well as review the game. I would have posted this on Steam, but I've already posted it in the KSP Steam group without reply.

I chose not to update to 1.2, because none of the good mods are up to date for it yet, so, that's good. Either way, that'd be great. Danke, komoraden.

To quote what I already put on Jester's wall, I have a STG 44 model ready to use. I tried setting it up myself, but, well, the model is entirely invisible because I have 0 idea what I'm doing. Preview

The engine doesn't provide Intakelqd even when in the water, probably a bug on my end, or there needs to be an actual intake for it.

Yeah, you added the right person. Good job mate. Now we just need to wait for a fancy staff meeting where we discuss what should be added, fixed, whatever.

Welp, either way. I've still gotta figure out all the hangouts nonsense so I can properly collaborate my ideas as to what should be done with it. Welp, I figured out the hangouts nonsense. I just need dem emails so I can add 'em.

Oh. Derp. I thought you where BT. Aren't I stupid?

Neato. You've still forgotten to do all the skype nonsense, but, whatever. I mean, I can figure out the google hangout nonsense, it's just gonna take lots of googling, Ironically.