Jump to content

EstebanLB

Members
  • Posts

    107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by EstebanLB

  1. Lagrange points are not valid on KSP, how do you mantain position of the L4 and L5 asteroids arround Jupiter?
  2. Cool, and what about comtibility with StageRecovery? I saw the note but not much more info on how will both work at the same time
  3. Sorry, my bad. I thought we had that option. Right now we can only hide the additional info, the name of the part will still show on mouseover
  4. Not that one, that just turns everything off. Gimme a second I'll show you wich one is
  5. What do you mean by the bottom part? There is an option to turn off the part tooltip on mouseover and just that, leaving everything else like it is
  6. There is, go to the settings in KER, you will find it somewhere
  7. I've seen some comments about functionality issues with career mode and science recovery. Is it working fine now?
  8. Hello all, I've looked in the OP and the last pages but found no info about 1.2.2 compatibility. Does it works in that version with no problems?
  9. If you want to take the challenge of facing the concequences, then you know what to do. TA TA TA TAN TAAAAN! Emergency resupply mission. After all, it's just the Mun, except Kerbin orbit, it's the closest you can be
  10. But you won't get the science points right away, It may take months or years to have them
  11. On Kerbin alone you can fill the MPL like 3 times if I calculate correctly. And that would last for a looong time. Timewarping for the MPL alone is exactly what I wouldn't do, it's extremely boring. And I plan to recover the lab and splash it in the KSC to get that money back. The thing is, that right now, bringing the MPL to other bodies won't give you sicence faster, it will just allow you to fill the MPL more times but that only pays of in the veeeery long run. I still need to visit other places to get bigger ammounts of science instantly, by either coming back or transmiting, but the MPL just won't give you that same benefit
  12. IMO the MPL mechanics should be modified to make players go to other bodies to deploy it as they progress in the tech tree and need even more science. That's why I said that the science rate production should depend on the body and situation multiplier as well, not just the convertion to data
  13. But the wiki states that the ammount of science per data is always 5, My concern being at wich rate said data gets converted to science
  14. But my question is, will two MPL with the 2 same scientists with the same level and the same ammount of data in the pool generate the same ammount of science per day if they are in different locations?
  15. Do al of them have the same scietist level and ammount of data? Because that ammount determines the science gain rate
  16. Hello all, I've just started getting into the use of the MPL and read a lot about how insignificant it is to process data on the surface of kerbin compared to the orbit or surface of another celestial body. While that makes total sense and encourages the player to send a manned MPL to other places I decided to have my first MPL on orbit arround Kerbin. Reading the data on the wiki and forums I got the explanation that you won't get much data on the orbit of Kerbin either and landing it or at least orbiting any of the moons or Duna would be a better option to spend the scientists and money on. BUT, with little planning and micromanaging, I gathered sufficient surface(launchpad), atmosphere(just the path to gravity turn) and space experiments (less than a couple of 30' orbits) to convert them all to data on orbit arround Kerbin to fill the 750 data pool on the MPL even BEFORE I finished the experiment list on the "space near" situation arround Kerbin, my whole plan to get more data on "space far" and remain there was a total waste, not to mention going even further. Is there any benefit at all to send the MPL outside of Kerbin? Of course that I could do it just for the milestone and fun, but I think that all the higher science multipliers of other celestial bodies are irrelevant. It would make more sense that the data to science conversion or the science production rate gets multiplied and not just the experiment value to data. What do you think? TLDR: You can fill the 750 data pool by just orbiting Kerbin
  17. I've just noticed that the Place Anywhere RCS ports radially attached to the 2,5 Service Bay don't work when the bay is closed. No matter where you attach it, inside or outside and if you used angle snap or not. Is there a reason for this behaviour?
×
×
  • Create New...