sal_vager

No one said how much was being paid, it could be $3.99

How about, "Devnotes, Banana for scale edition" ?

Lets not get picky here guys

Welcome to the community Psifroto There's lots of helpful people here, so ask away

I think it was decided that they'd be overcomplicated, all they do is moderate thrust and we have the thrust limiter for that, so in a way they are implemented, just in a different way

If they damage it enough the part explodes, and can also overheat making it go bang sooner, also it blocks thrust from the engine in question

Not a ban but yeah, probably best not to, most people reading this thread wouldn't be able to take that...

Hmmm, the term "Total conversion" comes to mind for some reason....

Just prod a mod, we forget to check sometimes

SelectRoot, RealChute, Mk2 Cockpit and KerbPaint

To me, if an intake is positioned so it's blocked by other intakes, other parts, inside other parts or on backwards then that is an airhogging intake, it's just there to give more intake air but wouldn't work in real life. Plenty of aircraft have big intakes to provide enough air for high altitude work so having several intakes per engine isn't a problem, as long as it looks right, having intakes all the way along your wings would normally prevent the wing from working so again would be air hogging (or wing hogging? and what about wings inside wings?) in my opinion

This would make the generated Kerbal rescue missions a pain for any planet or moon beyond the Kerbin/Mun/Minmus area, the plugin would have to know the difference between those Kerbals and your own, or be prepared for a huge rep hit. How about if Kerbals just slept when out of snacks? Like a probe becomes unresponsive if out of electric charge a Kerbal would become uncontrollable, and you could wake a Kerbal by bringing him snacks.

There's a few things you can try, like a different browser, clearing your cache, and trying again later. That you are able to log into your account is good

Lucre Kerman. Music.

Guys, you can make perfectly good posts without making them spammy

Can we please have Science labs threads that are about science? It's not too much to ask is it? Also, conspiracy theories are banned, because they cause so much trouble, alsoX2, arguing causes trouble, so yeah, closing thread

Hmmm, have you tried the IJKL and HN keys yet? The vernor is not like the RCS thruster block, it thrusts directly out of the face of the part, and unless you stick them on facing sideways they aren't going to be pointing the right way for rotation control. Try fitting some regular RCS as well so you can see when they are firing with your control inputs, and don't forget to press R

Moved to the development discussion section, also yes this has been discussed quite thoroughly and has been ruled out by Squad, sorry. It's on the What Not To Suggest list for that reason.

Everything you make is just solid gold Hayoo

You need to hang out in Support more Pecan, we'd always be seeing threads asking why there was no flame and the rocket wouldn't launch, usually posted as bug reports. Part of the FAQ here and elsewhere for a long time was "Press shift to throttle up"

Granted, you get one Zimbabwean dollar, I wish I could get that tune out of my head

Oh and nice thread SpaceXray

Hi Yakolev and welcome to the KSP forums Landing on the Mun is no small thing, it takes a lot of skill and patience to master, so you should be proud It'd be cool to see some pics of your historic rockets, you can upload them to imgur.com (no need for an account) and post the url's here

I think you'll like this thread (Thanks go to Kasper for making it)

This is so open to abuse/rules breaches it's unreal.....