Jump to content

dok_377

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    500

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by dok_377

  1. dok_377
    Oh, and apparently I used the wrong template I used the template from Waterfall package, when I should've used the template from Stock Waterfall Effects, which looks eons better and has an actual core in the plume. @Knight of St John again proves that his configs are the greatest thing that ever happened to stock parts.
  2. dok_377
    Probably. I'm not really using this part that much, so naturally didn't spend a lot of time tweaking the plume.
  3. dok_377
    Took a liberty of making the MEM config for myself, just to see how it would look. Well, it looks like this: The plumes are a little bit smaller because of the angular low poly nozzles. It just clips otherwise.
  4. dok_377
    It's not a mod. That's the pod from Making History dlc.
  5. dok_377
    Lifted and transported a helicopter. With itself.
  6. dok_377
    • As a player, I want my lights not to lag the game into oblivion if I use more than two. Probably should add that as well. In the first game the performance (at least in my experience) suffers immensely when more than two lights hit the surface shader of the planet. In space it works quite fine, but on the surface it's a nightmare.
  7. dok_377
    That's for all six textures total. The maximum size of one of the textures is 256 if I remember right, which is still quite a lot. The whole Spectra weights this much.
  8. dok_377
    800 megabytes cubemap? Isn't that a little bit too much? I installed this out of sheer interest and my gtx 1060 has a heart attack in the tracking station with 100% gpu usage. You only covered one planet with clouds and already using more ram and gpu than the entirety of Spectra or AVP. And they both cover all the planets, not just one. Edit: oh, apparently those textures were taken straight from AVP itself. But in AVP they're optional. This doesn't seem to be the case here, though.
  9. dok_377
    Kerbal Foundries.
  10. dok_377
    No. Found it somewhere. Don't remember where.
  11. dok_377
    There surely has to be a way. That one fix would literally change the whole game and improve it immensely.
  12. dok_377
    If only the same could be done for the robotic drift as well. @JPLRepo
  13. dok_377
    Unfortunately, I don't think KJR will be of any help here. It just stiffens the joints, where drift actually occurs because the game doesn't snap displaced robotic parts and docking ports back into place. It's a little bit different from just joint force. It might actually make parts drift less with stronger joints, but it will not help in the long run at all. Infernal Robotics itself suffers from a lot of bugs (not drifting related) as of today. But he said that he might be able to restart the development and fix the mod, which I'm counting on at this point. Absolutely. If there only was a way to make this happen.
  14. dok_377
    The stock thing is fricking crafts up completely. This is a craft with a new docking port on it, in case you can't see the report. It has issues similar to robotic drift, but way worse. The robotic drift only affects the robotic part itself and all the children of the robotic part, when the new docking ports affect the whole vehicle. And I don't think it can be fixed by just installing Dock Rotate, because the broken code will still be there. The only way to get rid of this, is to downgrade to 1.11.
  15. dok_377
    I am personally staying on 1.10 for the rime being. With all the changes that affect gameplay (like broken construction mode, inventory and docking port changes with a lot of bugs that come from those changes) it's really difficult to actually see something that will make me upgrade past 1.10. There aren't that many part revamps (and I'm using ReStock anyways), planet revamps are good to have, but considering that I will probably never send anything past Duna, it's not a big loss. And then again, we have Parallax as a last resort. For construction I'm using KIS and KAS, so I basically have the full functionality of 1.11 (and 1.12 ground anchors) in 1.10. The only thing I need to keep in mind is the fuel transfer bug, but with the amount of pretty quick and easy workarounds - it's not a problem at all. 1.11 and 1.12 didn't really introduce anything new or game changing if you're not against mods. The only thing that those versions did is break the game even more and break it exceptionally bad. I don't know what happened, but the QA processes in Squad seemed to completely cease for those two versions.
  16. dok_377
    You might want to check that again, I'm afraid. That has nothing to do with autostruts, even locked docking ports are pretty much just as susceptible to drifting as unlocked ones. Literally nothing changed.
  17. dok_377
    So, the drifting docking ports as well as drifting robotics will stay in the game forever. Lovely.
  18. dok_377
    On that topic. Is it possible to gain access to the old standard wing textures while still retaining the full TU recoloring options? I didn't see them until I removed the cfg for TU from the pwings folder, but in this case the recoloring is not possible, it's only old textures.
  19. dok_377
    Those are not numbers of orbits, that is the amount of experience points they have received for that particular achievement.
  20. dok_377
    -snip-
  21. dok_377
    Yes, it is. What I did on my end as a compromise is totally disabled the included AA from Scatterer so it's not "disassembling" thin objects anymore and enabled the postprocessing FXAA from KS3P. Sometimes it makes supersampled pictures a little bit blurry, but I downscale them anyways, so that's not a problem. Look at the antennas on top.
  22. dok_377
    Looked at it for like 10 minutes on 1.10.1 yesterday and everything appears to be fine. Except for the floating rocks on Duna, but that's Kopernicus issue, not Parallax.
  23. dok_377
    This works for me. After reading the post above and learning that these numbers are actually coverage percentages, I just increased the first split and increased the resolution to 16k to compensate for quality drop. If that seems a bit excessive, it actually doesn't eat any more performance than the stock setting from what I've seen. Probably because the actual quality of the shadow stays the same due to splits, it just has more distance to it. With and without full alt+scroll zoom.
  24. dok_377
    I'm sorry, but this is just too funny. 10 years was surely worth the wait.
  25. dok_377
    Seeing both of them.
×
×
  • Create New...