Redacted

Here i put the Balancer to good use.

I have all the controls except the ones mentioned from before. Checking for save file location... 1 sec. Google Drive link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ww7FxVw7_i04zRNpy6yJPAWGMlU3AX7u/view?usp=sharing Be aware that I have quite a few mods loaded.

CW and CCW buttons. Even the action groups I've created stop working.

@peteletroll I frequently have the buttons disappear and have to Save then Reload it to get the problem to resolve. Side note: here's a special lander i made using DockRotate.

Is it possible to set which fuel type / tanks being used for balancing or is this more of a general one size fits all?

Has anyone managed to use control groups with Dock Rotate yet? Just curious to see how this works...

I have noticed that when rotating then stopping it at some random point, the angle is an uneven number. (not a complete step increment) Thus when restaring the rotation its no longer able to stop at even, descreet increments. Would it be possible to have either a return to origin button or better yet a way to type in the figures manually to correct for the disparity? Keep in mind that DR is working as advertised, just that minor issue can make re-centering harder.

For most maneuvers Precise node is great. Yet for much longer missions, (Kerbin to Jool) it's difficult to nail down a good intercept. Especially one where managing DV is critical. Would it be possible to add a Rendezvous planner to this mod?

@IgorZ Your prior posts stated otherwise but whatever, wait and see I guess

@IgorZ Fine, continue to dodge the issue... I have to ask, If your not going to provide support or address the error then why bother with this mod at all?

@IgorZ 1) The Harpoons did initially stick but came off without any external force being applied. More to the point they self-detached at a rather high velocity considering that the cable was slack. 2) The expected cable behavior as you call it makes them all but unusable. Besides I didnt ask you to kill the physics just provide dampening so it does swing wildly forever. 3) Theres no reason not to fix the Harpoon logic as it will only save you time having to respond to those reporting the error. Keep in mind that the Harpoons are a major selling point of why people find KAS interesting.

@IgorZ Here you go: https://youtu.be/7fzpDxWvbJY (May take a few minutes to upload and process) Notice that both the Harpoons disconnect all on their own and that they refuse to re-connect with the winch. It's almost as if the mechanics behind the Harpoon / Wench rely on this being used on a body with gravity. If so then this makes them all but unusable anywhere but high gravity environments such as Kerbin. Even then, they still can misbehave, making their use undependable in the best of situations.

Well the legs can be dampened and offer setting to do so. The harpoons on the other hand are awesome, if they work.

Downloaded

@IgorZ Would it be possible to dampen the Winch’s cable as its being retracted? Currently the Harpoons I’ve used (legacy) spin / flail wildly when pulled back in. (Its as if physics is being overdone) Be aware that this can often detach both the harpoon & winch if left in this state unattended. To correct it i need to send a Kerbal out to grab and rebuild the them before performing other actions. Which to be honnest, sucks... I’ve lost track of the number of times I’ve grappled to an asteroid, fired both for extra stabilization and had one or both fail / flail. Side note: I have yet to try the non-legacy harpoons as i can’t find them using the VAB filtering. -Redacted

Tried the avalible DL today, while the menus worked fine the pathing seamed off.

Can this mod be used to filter by TWR and ISP?

Question, Is there a method or mod to filter the avalible VAB parts by TWR / ISP? Thanks in advance. Redacted

@SuicidalInsanity Any chance of a Linear Aerospike as a stand alone engine? (without the MK2 form) Edit... Taking a look at the T1 Toroidal vs the MK2 Linear Aerospike (TLA-200), the performance accounting for the difference in weight is within 1-2 % of each other. While the Linear Aerospike clearly has a much larger surface area (2-3 times) yet only showing a 78% gain in thrust. Furthermore, both motors have the exact same ISP (ASL 290 / Vac 340) when ideally the Toroidal should be slightly more efficient than the Linear. Currently it makes more sense to use a pair of T1’s instead of a single TLA-200. Would it be possible to increse thrust while reducing ISP for the Linear MK2? (360-400 thrust with 320-330 ISP)

I've tested a Patch file for the Blanket PV arrays that had the volume calculation issues. Works like a charm! Redacted

Their video doesn't suggest such.

Still from the video i just saw, it looks like it has a long way to go. (very unstable)

Sorry there was nothing i read that showed the project had been carried over.

Yes i realize as i created mods, meshes and scripts for SC / FA... Took a look at EPL, seems as if its not been updated in quite a long while.

Would it be possible to build an object using “build-beams” that trace the objects mesh outline. This way the object would slowly materialize as the scaning beams cross over each part of the mesh. Something like this was done with Surpreme command and Forged Aliance: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Commander_(video_game) The basic idea being that the 3D printer unfolds and thus can be used to create objects larger than itself. Hence the objects are built extrenally and held in place by magnetic fields.The Cybran and UEF factions had the best example of this...