Jump to content

Dientus

Members
  • Posts

    538
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dientus

  1. Not yet Nice to see the ADHD DRAGON @HyperDraco
  2. Poof! Better recheck your summoning formula! @AHHans
  3. Not yet. But why not? Paging @MetricKerbalist
  4. A) Pilot Besley wasn't always happy with the Captain's gung-ho tactics, and felt he should have led this mission over John. Knowing that they needed to refuel and not risk the ship or the mission any further, he stated plainly, "Captain, I think we need to aim for Pol and land there to begin reprocessing ore into fuel to continue the mission." Keordi didn't seem to like that idea, being a bit of an armchair pilot. Keverly, wanting to make the call regardless of the decision spoke up, "If we do this, Pol is the best bet, lowest required dV due to low gravity." Lucky decided to go ahead and land on Pol for ore. He also needed to decide who to take with him on this mission. While Keordi made sense because of the ore equipment as well as if something were to happen to the lander he could repair it, this was an excellent opportunity to gather science while they mined and get some extra science that KSC surely wasn't expecting. The issue is that there was only room for two in the lander. Does he choose A = Take the engineer Keordi with him. Better safe than sorry. B = Take the scientist Keverly with him. Fame and Science! C = Take the pilot Besley with him. The others are needed on the Excellence.
  5. Nein, ich spreche nur wenig. High school last place I used it. TUBM just used google translate to verify my sentence.
  6. Banned for quoting external links that can clearly be followed.
  7. Why did (insert game of choice here) update to this junk? They just added more bugs and it was way better before.
  8. Nope But it should be time for @JB182
  9. Both are banned for being picky
  10. I assume you are using breaking ground robotics? If so, immediately after docking shut off all SAS. Especially if COM is not, well centered. Also, lower the motor power and increase the dampening settings beforehand. And when I say increase I mean a LOT if the docking masses are large. Then after successful dock, lock the motors before moving to another vessel. When all is settled, reactivate SAS. So far this has worked for me.
  11. I agree. I sit in the pro procedural wings and tanks camp to keep part numbers low. Fuel tanks would have been nice but give and take you know? So I will gladly take the wings.
  12. The gravity of that statement just hit me. You are right. No matter the game, there will always be a group that just wants to spar and fight. It's nature. Now I am anxious to see what may happen since the physics of battle will include orbits and preplanning to land a missile correctly. Not to mention that as seen with BDArmory it is a near guarantee there will be some kind mod introducing practical weaponry systems (hopefully realistic and not fantasy sci fi in my opinion)
  13. Banned for not being as creative with planets
  14. I enjoy the results of math, not the number crunching itself. TUBM enjoys fast cars
  15. Banned for fearing a reference to your location
  16. Granted. They injure several buildings and are deemed dangerous by the Food and Drug Administration so they are hunted down and locked away in a laser-proof pen. I wish for a real boat to go on the ocean with.
  17. Wow, like only the second time I been mentioned in a ton of posts, and I miss the boat! Give me a boat to get on @ColdJ
  18. Here's one... The Hidden Fortress was far better than the rip off that George Lucas vomited with Star Wars .
  19. Banned for referencing your signature and I am on mobile which doesn't show signatures.
  20. 10/10 because this was the version I voted for on your thread. Good to see your name again!
×
×
  • Create New...