lammatt

instead of nuclear power, i think glucose or sucrose fuel cell makes more sense (or even the more traditional H2,Pt|H+||OH-|O2,Pt fuel cell) in terms of size

people clip to airhog. and this is stupid now, as flying spaceplane is very easy now with the rapier

wow (this is more than 10 characters now)

the delta-V values are not updating in flight...

posting in a closed thread - - - Updated - - -

i run into a problem that the icons are missing in both the UI and the toolbar. is there a way to fix it?

another you-use-mechjeb-you-are-bad-in-this-game guy. nothing interesting here.

i said the previous stats are OK 500times real life stats is fine in terms of gameplay. the current 2000times realtime thrust is just too much

you can basically make a manned plane using one and it can go airborne. this is ridiculously OP... the previous setting was OP already, i really dont understand they have to buff it even more... (if you bother to wiki ion thrusters, you'll see the one in KSP is about 2000 times the real ones.) i think the original stats were good in the concern of gameplay... pic of the plane i made with an ion engine. (the front part is the test weight mod, for aesthetic purpose here... set to 0.1t, 0.625diameter, 1x length, torque is off)

if you are stacking ion engines, you are probably having a wrong idea about the use of it.

too easy, they should make the trajectory steeper w.r.t. Kerbin's.

agree the ion engines are too OP. 2kN thrust is just a way too much.

do you mean... BF4?

no i think they'll still despawn if you dont have something attached to it for too long... (i tried to unhook an asteroid, and it turns in the "?" type again.

lol... this guy is funny

stock aerodynamic is actually very tricky after you adapted yourself to FAR...

does it work with 0.23.5?

it seems it's a lot harder to land there now. i tried a few times, i always touch down at the very start of the runway and still couldnt come to a stop at the end of it... perhaps it's just FAR changed the flaps/airbrake calculations in their update... (and it seems planes loses speed in air a lot slower now too...)

theres no science for the asteroids

O... didnt realize this...(as it didnt bother me much on my HD7850 desktop) but i guess if it's the case, gotta give a thumb to squad.

Atom?? o my.... i cant tolerate playing the stock game with my older gen1 i5 2.6G+ATI 5670M notebook... cant even imagine how it would be like on an atom... it's pretty ok when i tried the game on my newer i5 +GTX760m notebook, but i dont quite like it anyways, the computer gets hot very quickly --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i think yes, you can probably play the game with a tablet running win8, as long as your CPU dont go crazily hot and you can tolerate the performance. but for me... i'll totally give up the idea...

No RCS, No Solar Panel, No Battery, No, nuclerthermo generator (didnt mean to, but forgot anyways) <iframe class="imgur-album" width="100%" height="550" frameborder="0" src="http://imgur.com/a/XZby2/embed"></iframe>

dont get too excited tho... (it's easier than i thought, the generated asteroid trajactories pretty much match Kerbin's... the relative speeds arent very high when they enter Kerbin's sphere. i didnt even use any of the new parts except the hook capturing my first 552ton rock, it's easier than going to Duna...) i hope they buff the mass of the rocks or make the trajectories differ more from kerbin's next patch

O... do i have to undock? cos i cant see that rock in the tracking station like i had.

I captured one... can anyone teach me how i can check the asteroid's info... the size, mass...etc -------------------------- i shot the tug up the skies and then found out i forgot the solar panels and RCS... (lucky i still could switch off the battery before it ran out; and my tug is light enough to turn itself quickly with just the pod's torque) <iframe class="imgur-album" width="100%" height="550" frameborder="0" src="http://imgur.com/a/XZby2/embed"></iframe>