Jump to content

Iapetus7342

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    335

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Iapetus7342

  1. Iapetus7342
    Delete the code that manages KSC's position, set Sanctar's isHomeworld flag to false and make Magnifica its own body that orbits Kerbol suuuuppeeeer far away
  2. Iapetus7342
    Very well then, let the nuclear fallout decend
  3. Iapetus7342
    I landed on Derbin's poles in Whirligig World. Here's 4 photos I took during EDL that I shared to the Virtual Photographers subreddit.
  4. Iapetus7342
    Cough cough "You think an ultra-dense planetary body is in the same bracket of unrealism as a system full of dozens of black holes that miraculously balance themselves at all the L1/2 points of all the moons and planets? Because it's not. 1/10th scale planets with kepler physics is good enough for introducing players to gravity and space travel, representing lagrange points as black holes was not 'good enough' for stock KSP. Reality doesn't validate the image you have of Squad's developers all sitting around a table thinking "how could we possibly represent lagrange points in a keplarian universe?" and failing to think of what this mod does. They certainly thought of it, and they certainly heard it a lot from players, but it's not the "rather obvious solution" you think it is. Black holes that you can use to swing 180 degrees in your orbit is clearly not the miraculous key to L-points in keplarian physics that Squad was looking for. " 1. This is how lagrangian points have to work in Patched Conics. 2. You are also ignoring my advice to ignore the mod if you don't like it. Either use Principia or make your own magical lagrange points that don't act like pocket black holes that orbit in-sync with the planets of your system of choice.
  5. Iapetus7342
    There is a simple solution to this: Ignore the gosh diddily darn mod! If you don't like how langrange points work in this mod, might i suggest ignoring the mod or making your own?
  6. Iapetus7342
    HOW COULD YOU SAY THAT???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? /j
  7. Iapetus7342
    I got the idea from Exo's Planet Jam 3, where one of the planetary systems (Mun Kon Wawa and Mun Kon Tawa) share a ring.
  8. Iapetus7342
    Maybe you could add another binary planet similar to Kevin-Kelvin, but only one of the planets are habitable. This binary would also have 2 other moons and a shared ring system orbiting the barycenter!
  9. Iapetus7342
    MechJeb is more realistic than eyeballing everything
  10. Iapetus7342
    Scatterer is fully compatable with Parallax. IDK how to change the settings tho
  11. Iapetus7342
    Parallax is compatable with Kcalbeloh and Beyond Home, with there being mods to add scatters for OPM and MPE. Precursors is also planning to release a Parallax update soon. (these are all the ones i can remember off the top of my head)
  12. Iapetus7342
    Good news
  13. Iapetus7342
    Heads up, Discord images don't work here. Try putting your images on Imgur instead.
  14. Iapetus7342
    As a redditor myself I can confirm that there are indeed entitled users who complain and complain and complain over and over about paid mods, like, it's not hurting anyone at all
  15. Iapetus7342
    No.
  16. Iapetus7342
    It sure is.
  17. Iapetus7342
    The way that TSPR improves the planets goes like this: Identify planet Delete it from existence Replace it with a better looking copycat ??? Profit. This means that Minmus is identified by TSPR and is deleted after MKR loads its patches, with the TSPR clone keeping Minmus' original orbit. Your best bet is to: A; Copy+Paste MKR's Minmus orbit data into TSPR Minmus' file, OR B; Use Hyperedit to manually drag Minmus back to where it should be. Hope this helps!
  18. Iapetus7342
    It's better than nothing. Also this is the same system with comically-dense planets and a moon of a far-off gas giant that has liquid water on its surface so the lagrange points not lagranging is likely the least of your concerns
  19. Iapetus7342
    F. Possibly.
  20. Iapetus7342
    Works for me too
  21. Iapetus7342
    This is awesome.
  22. Iapetus7342
    Non-volumetric works perfectly!
  23. Iapetus7342
    As I said previously in this thread:
  24. Iapetus7342
    Lookin' good!
  25. Iapetus7342
    Still seems to be broken
×
×
  • Create New...