http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/showthread.php/36863-What-not-to-suggest What more evidence do you need beyond the clear statements of those who built the universe?
Not to mention that people can run the old versions and play their old saves any time they want. All it takes is a little extra effort to not delete the old version when a new one comes out.
Oh, yes. I know those very well. Actual conversation once: "Hey, dad. Which shuttle is launching tonight?" "It's 104." "Uhh... which one is that?" "104. I don't know their names."
My point is that STS in regards to shuttle does not mean Shuttle Transportation System, it means Space Transportation System. STS was a program from the 1960s, the only surviving part being the Shuttle. If you're going to use the vocabulary, use it correctly. It irks me. (But when I was growing up, I had to learn the OV-XXX designations to be able to talk to my father about them, so I tend to be a bit pedantic about the terminology sometimes.)
The SCA is a system that transports the shuttle, hence Shuttle Transportation System. The crawlers were systems that transport the shuttle, as well. The Shuttle was part of the Space Transportation System, so the Shuttle Transportation System must be something else.
Go back to our homes?!? How can you be serious? There's a time traveler loose on these very forums, and you want us to ignore it? Please, oh time-traveled poster, tell us what the future holds. (And next time, download KSP before you go back in time.)
No, that's just another tree. There is no such tower at KSC. Because it's not exactly an active airport? The only things that land there usually have a Meatball on them. Any civilian traffic is handled by civilian ATC elsewhere.