andrew123

I can make it an atmospheric vessel. This thing is meant for space combat. You seem a little down today. A little something to cheer you up. Not the AMD type. I like NVIDIA better. How zesty. A cooler.

The afterburner model is nothing new. Check the old zokesia thread.

I made a joke based on elementary stereotypes. Most of the oil is rather synthetic in origin.

That means all of our rockets were powered by the atoms of our long lost relatives. Apollo eleven must have spit out millions of dinosaurs on its way to the moon.

I had that in one of my 0.20 planes. Or maybe a few.

Do you guys really want me to resurrect my JDAM program? My f-99 is just waiting for a large munition... I decided to upgrade the bombs for heavy targets, like armored naval battleships and soviet heavy ekranoplans. I mean, this would be a tragedy...

Time warp is only speeding up the universe. Just think of it as going at 99 percent the speed of light and having relativistic slowdown.

The Ho 229 is a real demon to fly... especially at high speeds. Has anyone tried to fly it in il2 1946 before... engine overheat and fuel tank explosions.

Pah. Youngsters and their fancy toys... Back in version -20.0, we had to dream about space travel, but the graphics have only gotten worse, especially the damned water.

For science. Not war. (From about over one year ago. It had good handling.)

Shoot down some migs! Time to make mig alley! Ah, the good old days. My foxhound replica from a while ago. Well, pretty accurate with looks due to the use of mostly stock parts. I could probably modernize it from scratch if it is needed in stock configuration. Anyone remember my stealth drones? I wonder what that bay is for?

I'm actually from the US, specifically my city of san diego. (Miramar airshow. Heck yeah.) My family is otherwise Korean.

Hey, my grandpa was a colonel in that war! In the south korean military. (Apparently refused a promotion to general. I still wonder why.)

As an owner of a gtx 760, I should probably be able to help. The only thing holding me back is the fx 6300 amd processor in my computer.

Lol, I built a very similar looking Peacekeeper ICBM for fun back in KSP 0.20. Funny enough, the actual Minotaur is technically a converted Peacekeeper missile.

My MK 1.5 UNSC destroyer. I will release the MK 2 later on, but the mk 1.5 has survived multiple simultaneous direct hits by large srb torpedoes and I beam dumb swarm barrages with almost no damage. With unarmed ares missiles, during the weapons development. Warheads were added later, and note the two large sized weapons bays along with space on the sides of the front for more guided missiles.

I see... so should I fit my prowler cruiser with my odst drop pods? They are quite old. ODST pods. From a few months ago. The front of the destroyer will also get a very slight modification. It will help with the weapons.

I have finals this week. I hate damned ellipses.

Why not fly it a bit higher. I don't think anyone in ksp can fly at those altitudes for extended periods of time without aid.

Should I get the i7 4770k with a z97 or z87 chipset motherboard? Not sure whether or not I want to pay those devils at intel for locked features.

It is a surface effect airplane. The soviets were going to fly them at near waterline altitudes and fit them with huge amounts of supersonic cruise missiles to attack american aircraft carriers.

Yes. The user below me will have watched an obscene video in their life.

Have you tried the missiles against my prowler cruiser or the destroyer. I would like some combat data. Or even my unsc paris class frigate. It will laugh off most strikes.

I actually made a new revision with the design lessons from my unsc prowler cruiser and unsc destroyer mark II. I will post it eventually, but my first priority is getting my two ships ready for combat.

Should I upgrade the destroyer into the modern combat standards? It is already well armored. Does my destroyer look good? I can do some aesthetic changes if required.