Jump to content

Genolution

Members
  • Posts

    141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Genolution

  1. Ignore me. I'm being thick. http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/94410-Ideas-for-the-New-Secret-Feature-in-0-25%21
  2. Look everybody I'm a modder too!! Just because you put together a list of mods that just happen to work together doesn't make you a modder Did you not read the thread? It seems you didn't or at least you failed to comprehend the sentiment of the majority of modders who posted. Your very own initial release included a very outdated mod. You obviously don't know the difference between right and wrong. Somebody provides for you something of value for free asking only that you follow a few simple rules and you cant even abide by that? I just don't understand how such a simple moral concept can go over peoples heads like this.When push comes to shove I don't think Squad/KSP forum moderators will be willing to alienate the moddrs who contribute to this community by giving you a platform to violate license agreements. Doesn't mean It will be tolerated here. What? Good mods are relevant because people want them regardless if they play single or multiplayer. What are you going on about? At least you understand what you are doing is wrong. That's a start. I'm sure the "But everyone else is doing it" argument never held water with either of our mothers so why do you persist? To get banned? And it was demonstrated earlier and failed when the curator got bored or to busy.
  3. After reading that thread even I am offended by this. You are not a modder. Maybe you just don't understand what you are doing. I hope you don't go any further than a simple list but you mention a zip. file which would be against many license agreements and would anger the people that contribute the most in this community. You realize this, right?
  4. So you learned nothing from the discussion in that thread? And you expect every mod author who did all the work to make the game by your own admission (implied) more enjoyable and who doesn't want to be included in this terrible idea to go through the trouble of "opting out" every time some yahoo decides to assemble a pack of their outdated work?
  5. Thanks Red. I'm not exactly a forum warrior. This is the most active I have ever been on any forums.
  6. Yeah man. It's about time to stop and actually play the game for a bit. And see the wife. But just playing with the new parts and seeing how they work together will give you alot of ideas. Ill give you more on my observations when i get home from work. I hate posting on my phone.
  7. Multumesc! Thanks NB! Now I will have to resolve myself to making a VTOL that actually works.
  8. For some reason I thought the thread title said "ksp meth lab". Leaving disappointed.
  9. I got to have those! I'm currently planning my first grand tour. I will be eagerly awaiting you next release.
  10. Damn you Apollo13! Just when I thought I was finished with my station you pull me back in!
  11. I posted this in the station pics thread a few minutes ago and someone gave me rep.
  12. 324 parts, 209 tons, 17 launches,3 hours to design, 6 hours to build, 2 very tired eyes.
  13. Definitely the small jet engine. Been thinking about that for some time now. Would do wonders for vtols. A propeller wouldnt hurt either. But im sure that would require a plugin.
  14. A search by author would be nice. Such as Mulbin or his company name apogee. Or even youtuber name.
  15. Yeah, throttleable. Think surface attachable 48-7s that uses monoprop without OP ISP. something that is easier to mount with the thrust vector centered. I think it would be handy for small body landers and station tugs. grabbing a big station section and hauling it back using such engines fore and aft would be really nice. Especially if I only needed one fuel type.
  16. Dude... do you realize you just.... and it's so... I think I love you. This is such an awesome part pack man. It fills nearly all the gaps in the stock parts list while offering a premium stock alike aesthetic feel. Its just how I imagined squad will release v1.0. It really points out just how bad the old parts look compared to the new ones. Any chance I can talk you into making a node and surface attachable inline RCS motor suitable for landers?
×
×
  • Create New...