Cesrate

The white condensation clouds re-appeared before the reentry FX in stock 0.23+FAR(latest version)... Not sure what led to this phenomenon.

I'm sticking in it right now... As 0.97.1 really get a good point... And it's the closest one to Infinity, with procedural generated celestial bodies and relatively realistic physics... And... Shut up and take my money! http://en.spaceengine.org/index/funding_and_donations/0-26 Oops, I have no credit card, only debit card.... All in 5512×3120, except for the auto-compressed one...

Ngc7032 ﹌﹌

http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1219v1

A D-Mail is needed:)

When many of this come...

Nope. I mean when you rotate the camera at supersonic speed.

Uhh... It seems that the gradient of volume changes hasn't been included. This should be fix...

Awesome. Here's an advice, to make sound gradually disappear while crossing the Mach cone, instead of a suddenly cut-off. And... It seems that this plugin has some contradictions with FAR+DRE, for condensation cloud disappear while beyond 1.2 Mach and appear again after crossing a certain height. Edit: Uhh this seems to only happen in Real Solar System.

Who need that?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_lantern

I'm not good at talking about things after 2050. And, China won't abuse military resources. PS, China won't get out from the preliminary stage of socialism until 2050.

Why can't we talk about it? It's acceptable to talk about the government even in Chinese network, as long as you are not spreading rumors or in an extreme. I don't know what you are specifically pointing. If you are meaning high school physics in my opinion in physics classes most of the concepts are conveyed right, at least in the level of the current grade. Oh, the quality gaps between different schools should be considered, but textbooks are mostly correct. In fact, despite of exam-oriented education system and heavy burden, elementary education in China is one of the world's most "high level" system... I'M NOT MEANING HIGHER EDUCATION. One major problem of Chinese education is geographic differences in quality.

Nice fantasy but not necessarily to be the truth. You think China is equal to NK? I really doubt if there're enough political prisoners, and what's your definition on "own people" - are they armed murderers? And, "Made in China" mostly belongs to the private industries, and it's still too waste to use the profit of selling toys to buy weapons as Chinese industries can produce them themselves.

That's why I hate the censorship, not only because it will take a bit more effort to share YouTube videos to friends - you banned the chance of slander but also banned the chance of communication. But, frankly speaking, there may not be many ones who can be neutral to these histories and may not be many places where things can be objectively discussed. And, in fact I don't like to talk about history, as I'm neither good at it nor interested in it. I'm living more in future I think. Fun fact 1: The students are the vanguards of the time, and the students in the college I'm in were the vanguards of the vanguards of the time, from the 5•4 movement to the protest against US Embassy after the bombing of Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia. Why? Because my college is nearer to the centre of Beijing~ Then is Liu Xiaobo, we actually have the trandition of rebellion~ Luckily there's Mo Yan to make a balance. Fun Fact 2: The ex-principal of the college in our neighbor is one of the major contributor to the Great Fire Wall of China. Once he was in the campus of THU, then the students there shouted... "XXX! You *********!" "May your child have no ass****!" Well, they were usually gentle... Fun(?) Fact 3: Edit: My memory had some mistakes... So this is the confirmed version: In the early period of 6•4 incident, my father wanted to meet my mother and had to pass through Tian'anmen, but was grounded by my grandmother's sister.

Off-topic: My full opinion on history: 1. Admit history if it's true; 2. Use historical perspectives to analyse history; 3. And use history to guide future actions. For example, after WWII German did well on 1, 2 and 3 so German turned to be a normal country to victims. However, Japan didn't do well on 1, and I don't know how they did on 2, and also didn't do well on 3 (Sorry about the offence, I like Japanese culture but the attempts of some right wing extremists to cover the history of invasion are just unacceptable), so Japan received lots of hates. It's still sad that in contemporary world we're still struggling with hates between countries and nations while facing global problems and possibilities.

How to change the atmosphere height actually? I tried but failed.

Ahh, that famous pic... Has almost become a neta on Chinese Internet...Let's have a tank racing! Well, just a joke. Oh, GRC or GCR(this may be the more common ab.) means The Grand Culture Revolution, the total internal disorder from 1966 to 1976. Show my opinion about GRC and 6·4 incident: Each leader has the image that the next generation of leaders want public to know. For Mao, he had a great contribution on liberating China (KMT used to have chance, but, uhh, they led up to their own failure), but also made lots of mistake(including ignoring the scientific truth of population and causing the burst of it) and held some dark political struggle to ensure his rule. And, the disaster GCR was caused by his political attack on Liu Shaoqi and misjudgement(although most of the disorder was made by "Gang of Four" but Mao was also to be blamed). Historians today think that he has 70 percent of credit and 30 percent of fault. As for Deng, he survived the GCR and led the "reform and opening-up" and directly led to the China's place in the world today. But he also bring the chances of corruption. Then is the burst of anger mainly from students(students are always the vanguards of the time, from the 5·4 movement to 6·4... Don't know how to comment on it.) then is the 6·4. This is a very vicious incident that completely unmatched to the image of Deng's gov and the theme of the era(development and the appeasing the conflicts). And also in my opinion, China has had a deep reflection on GCR and other mistakes in the early ages inside and in the the public(and you can see some in history books) and has had a deep reflection on 6·4 inside(well, it should be deep...) but hasn't prepared for making it public. It's partially because, well, China has been following Deng from then on and never get rid of corruption problem. Though, the current leader, Xi Jinping has been actively tackling these problems. For the era of Hu, China is speeding up to develop in the "Golden Ten Years" while US is focusing on the Middle East so I guess the anti-corruption seemed to be like the secondary task then... Well, just a guess. Another problem is the advancing of Internet and the drop of public trust because of some bad incidents. There were many rumors spreading on Internet, then the Internet just became a wasteyard. So awful that both gov and scientific community got awful so they started to clean up the rumors. Well, this seems to be off-topic, so continuing the topic... Plus, IMO the top-layer of China gov get 7-8/10 since 1990s. And the middle-layer of the gov got... 5/10 maybe? Levels of Some officials were just suck. Just noticed this line, first access to Google is not completly banned now unless you search for some censored word, second, I actually don't have that problem as I'm using ipv6 port in campus (and with Google proxy there's usually no problem even with other network), and third, IMO both you and I should be rejoice that only a few Chinese that know how to access YouTube now. Really, that's not joking and with multiple aspects of meanings... And the fourth, Xi's gov seems to have tendency on loosing the censors - just seems to have. To the point, if there were no rumors and slanders to China in foreign nets things would be better now. All right, though lots of us including me are VERY UNSATISFIED with the GFW.

Life is used to be cheap in China but not for now and for future. And, of course in history book that incident will not be mentioned. There's already GRC stuffs in history book, asking us to teach children more things like that? That's enough, don't want to talk about it. The only thing I want to say is, Chinese gov is not as so good as someone said, but not as so bad as someone said either. Plus, it's actually pretty good and efficient(?) to take "human rights" as the tool to attack other countries in politics. Plus 2, as far as I know... Chinese are also not happy with US' external policy. … and China has grasped the chance to develop when US ignored China and focused on the Middle East, so things nowadays is a little different with 1990s. Plus 3, use historical perspectives to analyse the history, that's what I learned in history class. Oops, talked too much.

They are having rest at the noon of moon, for about 7 days.

So good, so in future the cooperation between NASA and China could become better, at least not worse than what is now - absolute zero. And we've started to get tired of his anti-China opinions too. So happy retiring and enjoy the retired life, Wolf.

Humm, how about just running the simulation in two parts? It's not efficient but may work and usually players won't put too much things in atmosphere. And you only need to load the ship with simplified physics model and a precise "collision plate" on surface. Without rendering it.

I guess, as the "collision plate" of planet surface has a limited radius, if the parts weren't deleted they will fall from the "ground" or, "planet plate". Correct? All right, I'd like to know, considering the structure of KSP, where's the limit about how far in distance can a ship be physically presented without falling off or falling apart?

Just see it... Well, congratulations:)