Cesrate

As far as I know China plans to set up a little base in 2030. Not sure who will be the competitor, maybe NASA, Russian, others or some private industries. Edit: Alright, China "is likely planning" to set up a little base in 2030. And it may just be the springboard to Mars. Everything is not sure. And I forgot Europe,sorry. Edit: So... US has the same goal to Mars, does it? Interesting...

Banned because the weird avatar(what is it?)

In fact it's relatively easy to distinguish between sì and sÇÂ.

That's logical, as Kerbals are in another universe.

N/A I'm not sure what I've seen...

In fact it won't be very surprising if the landing were failed, as there's too many new techs. As for races, China won't be interested in pointless space races, at least for now. And moon landing will also not change the distribution of major forces to the space(US, Russian, China and SpaceX), and their aims.

Well, just found they've started a donation. Have to admit it's an ambitious project... as long as it won't crash a lot like 0.9.7... http://en.spaceengine.org/index/funding_and_donations/0-26

Squad: Hire this guy to make Kerbal Space Program 2

Good enough, although there're some bugs. I suggest to put this, FAR and realistic rocket settings into one pack named "Earth like KSP" or something else:P

Title is the question.

Good idea. Can modder do this?

I'm using Steam on other games but KSP. Because for KSP I'm not quite believe Steam updates and Patcher.

The problem is if the amount of bytes can be changed.

The "68 years limit" seems to only affect the UT number that shows in Tracking Station. The game's still running after reaching that limit. If that's right, the only problem is we have a lot of time but a clock to express it properly.

Oops I made a mistake. Alright I've edited.

68 years of UT is a little too short. Can we use more bytes? If 8 bytes are used to express UT, then the limit will be long enough.

About 6 hours ago NASA announced Voyager 1 has escaped.

Use Bandicam.

“what next†Next we will have 3D-printed AK-47 and RPG. In any country.

Consciousness is completely a different "thing"(or something others). We can explain computer with current knowledge of physics, but if we discovered the complete structure of association cortices can we explain why consciousness exist instead of we are all automatical machine with the current knowledge? - I doubt.

You just totally followed my thought, why you say it's wrong? Uhh... "something" had included process.

Yes I know there isn't a decent definition of it, but compared with men in sleep, bacteria and personal computer, consciousness does exist, no matter what it is. And, consciousness is limited to certain areas in cerebral cortex. See blindsight experiments.

All right, the reason why I say this is simple, there's no known physics (I've known) that indicates the existence of consciousness. But consciousness do exist.

All right, just a personal thought, ignore this.

10/10. Too great to comment.