Jump to content

DisarmingBaton5

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,273

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by DisarmingBaton5

  1. DisarmingBaton5
    Better, except the scene loading times.
  2. DisarmingBaton5
    Perhaps if they were mounted on the top instead? I don't know how easy or difficult that would be, but it might help! Or you could follow ZRM's advice and put it on the window.
  3. DisarmingBaton5
    Pull a Scott Manley and ring your docking ports with them.
  4. DisarmingBaton5
    I know planetary orbits seem to warp when you zoom in or out really fast, but I have never seen anything like this. On a side note, you should follow Sapphire's advice.
  5. DisarmingBaton5
    I sent two rescue missions after this one (dry) lander in a very eccentric orbit. They ran out of fuel as well, so they are now marked as debris.
  6. DisarmingBaton5
    ^^^^This. The Mainsail should sound like an F-1.
  7. DisarmingBaton5
    Can you make a poll? That may make things easier. Anyway, I usually build small 100-250 part spacecraft at launch, 10-100 parts in orbit. Probes<crew<station modules.
  8. DisarmingBaton5
    ZRM, will the shuttle work on Mac? It seems to need your plugin, but I do not know to what extent and after viewing the KCA thread, I think I may have some problems. (I'm on Mac)
  9. DisarmingBaton5
    0.17, but I have only been active on the forum since... sometime after that.
  10. DisarmingBaton5
    A good idea, and a good alternative to subassembly saver/loader. This thread should be in "Suggestions," though
  11. DisarmingBaton5
    MOOOOOOO! ...n
  12. DisarmingBaton5
    How will the docking module work? Will it be like Hitchhiker and have an IVA? Also, the docking module looks like something that could be stock-compatible. Does it attach to stock parts?
  13. DisarmingBaton5
    ^^^^This. On another note, I vote against the HUD on the PIC window. Seems like it would detract from the view and make it more difficult to photograph stations. (Because we all like taking pictures of spacecraft from other spacecraft)
  14. DisarmingBaton5
    That thing looks like it took ages to construct.
  15. DisarmingBaton5
    This is why I do not use Sr ports. Standard only in the Disarming Baton Space Agency!
  16. DisarmingBaton5
    Or maybe a 0.875m version for CUTENESS! Fwap'a durp! (sorry, couldn't resist)
  17. DisarmingBaton5
    You are still using Firespitter screens? If so, how many? I want to know how viable it will be to fly this from cockpit view.
  18. DisarmingBaton5
    When in doubt, abandon aesthetics and use triple layer asparagus. "Don't forget struts!" -Bob Kerman
  19. DisarmingBaton5
    I... I... Get on it, Harv.
  20. DisarmingBaton5
    That's not too difficult. I prefer trying a Gemini-Titan. Good luck getting past the capsule! (excluding Mulbin)
  21. DisarmingBaton5
    I like the fairing idea. It needs a foreboding name still.
  22. DisarmingBaton5
    I'm up for a 1.8m fuselage (Is that what it would be called on a spacecraft?) as someone who does not use too many mods.
  23. DisarmingBaton5
    That's what I thought about "Atlantis." (As in the NASA one) Doesn't it sound like foreshadowing? And if I may suggest a name: Icarus Fits in with the foreboding theme!
  24. DisarmingBaton5
    This sounds cool; I am certainly watching that video. However, you may want to change the title of this thread; It looks like another multiplayer thread.
  25. DisarmingBaton5
    Beat me to it.
×
×
  • Create New...