Jump to content

NathanKell

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,406

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by NathanKell

  1. NathanKell
    Try being more gentle. If flying with the keyboard, use capslock and "peck peck peck" the keys, don't hold them down.
  2. NathanKell
    Sorry, totally dropped the ball on this. I'll try to get the worksheet up tonight!
  3. NathanKell
    Lack: Back with another plane related request... :] I'm been using the heck out of your Bonanza cockpit as a WW2 razorback/birdcage canopy. Example: My request is if you could modify it such that the top is also windows (real life inspiration: F4F Wildcat) by changing the UV so the top pulls from the same area of the texture as the other windows (ideally, of course, with the same framing as the sides, not just one big piece of glass). Additional example, shown with one of your intakes to make the razorback look:
  4. NathanKell
    Awesome, awesome stuff!
  5. NathanKell
    ThorBeorn: Cool! And yes, that's intended: I didn't want to kill the module entirely, and I hope at some point to add increasing gimbal based on TL, but I did want the early TL0/1etc version to be ungimballable. Although now after (this prompted me to do) a bit more research, even Vanguard's AJ10-37 was gimbaled, so I probably should add back a degree or so. romie: cool! In other news: this isn't actually dead yet (still!). While away on my trip I did some writing; I'm finally (implicitly) laying out more background, and am preparing a new chapter: Jane's All The World's Hunters. Included is the H3F Bobcat (here shown in prewar US Navy hiviz).
  6. NathanKell
    Holy crap. An hour is...quite a long time. It's only 20m for me... This is why I ship the default OBJs with RSS, so that people using the default config don't have to wait on first load. If you switch configs and your new config doesn't come with OBJs though...then you gotta wait.
  7. NathanKell
    EVE (both 7.3 and Overhaul) has issues with RSS. rbray is working on them. So does Kethane. Both have taken the scale of planets in scaledspace as a given, which is...unsafe...in RSS. 6.2 does use somewhat more ram *when loading* due to the wrapping, but that shouldn't be very much memory all told. I am currently fixing a bug (evidence: solar panels aren't treated as behind planets, sun shines through planets) due to my forgetting to rescale the colliders as well as the meshes. I have moved the giant "YOU MUST DELETE OBJs" text in the OP, since apparently it was being missed
  8. NathanKell
    Well, I still have to add code to scale/rework the colliders. But yeah, glad that's figured out. :]
  9. NathanKell
    Woohoo! Thanks to all you awesome folks!
  10. NathanKell
    Here's a stripped one. https://www.dropbox.com/s/zte9pko0dkaodpv/RealSolarSystem_v6.2_stripped.zip Note that you'll want to replace LaunchSites with whatever set of sites you want.
  11. NathanKell
    Use Snjo's gear alignment module to display gear axis alignment vs. straight, and use Padishar's Part Angle Display to rotate them (in fractions of a degree) until straight.
  12. NathanKell
    Suggestion: use ModuleSAS as your dummy module, rather than ModuleRCS. Less confusing.
  13. NathanKell
    On the train, I think I've realized what the issue is. Turn wrap off and see if the problem goes away. I forgot to rescale the collider.
  14. NathanKell
    If you're using Photoshop, that's because it has a horrible png importer. Get the SuperPNG plugin
  15. NathanKell
    You could install it as the installation instructions direct. Readme and OP both tell you how
  16. NathanKell
    camlost: Hodo is asking how to make the module, not make a bigger intake. Hodo is talking about intakes that don't already have your module. Also: how come intakes have *better* pressure recovery in the transonic regime than subsonic? Isn't that backwards?
  17. NathanKell
    If your KSC is underground, up your terrain detail (or follow the other instructions in the RSS FAQ).
  18. NathanKell
    Very, very nice!
  19. NathanKell
    Awesome! I really like the doors.
  20. NathanKell
    That's great! ...And *you* obviously did all the hard work here. One thing I'd request on that, if it's not too much trouble, is to make a more aerodynamic version of the fairings (blocking the hatch, and instead of having a hole for the pod window, just a window on the aeroshell. As you doubtless know I'm a giant realism nut, and I'd love to make as real a D2 as possible. (For funny "not actually made" values of real, obvs )
  21. NathanKell
    At the moment, yes.
  22. NathanKell
    If you right-click on a part that has (a) a RESOURCE with maxAmount=0 and ( shows it via tweakables, the mass will become not-a-number (NaN) since it's dividing by 0. Then the mass of the craft will become NaN, and thus CoM will disappear.
  23. NathanKell
    https://github.com/RemoteTechnologiesGroup/RemoteTech Official continuation of RT2.
  24. NathanKell
    pjf: *LR18-4: Working on redoing the tech limits for tanks. *Repeatable experiments *may* be an RT2 bug with transmission. Try to replicate without RT2? *No idea even what struts you're talking about; I'd suggest talking to the part author? *Weird about the FASA flags... *There should be plain old conic fairings? Are they missing? *NovaPunch has weird part placement, yes. MN, congrats again on the "Name in Lights!"
  25. NathanKell
    All RESOURCE nodes with maxAmount and amount of 0 need isTweakable = false hideFlow = true in them.
×
×
  • Create New...