Requiem762

I've been into space stuff for a long time and just recently started sky watching and every time I see Venus it's amazing.

Your mileage may vary.

A lot of people suspect lay hates oceans are liquid ammonia.

may take longer cus of .23 dropping soon as most of us suspect it will be around kerbal con.

Do not ask for releases people.

The same way you would a planet I guess

dec 12 I think

RESTOREING SENSE TO THREAD. Not all shuttle typ space craft need to be replicas. Ps OP best stock shuttle I've seen in a while.

Well I'd have NASA. Continue development of SLS. Begin asteroid capture mission and insert into lunar orbit. (Have that done about the time orian is up and running) Have crewed spacecraft study captured asteroid. Send rover to moon that has a lander capable of sample return ( 1 up china.) Encourage UK space program to fully develop skylon and buy some to run space tourist operation to make money on side. Spearhead international effort for asteroid defense. Collaberate with Spacex orbital sciences and ULA to conduct manned Martian flyby. Establish temporary moon base to study feasibility of a international moon colony. Send landers to Europa Io and Titan. Send Rover to Pluto to circumnavigate it just for LOLs and science.

There's a lot wrong with the movie.

The network will probably milk the controversy as long as they can to keep interest in the show up and I feel they may try to do the same thing next season. I'm in the same boat as you because I don't really care about gimmicky celebrity/talent related shows and in the US there is the occasional controversy but nothing on the scale you have described. What country did this happen to?

Sound theory but the big concern over global warming is the side effects like super storms, rising sea levels leaving Whole islands underwater, and droughts. All of this could displace hundreds of thousands and millions could go hungry from famine. Not to mention that if we don't start building a green infrastructure while we are weening ourselves of oil then we could end up having a few resource wars. Not trying to scare monger or tow some party line just stating potential results.

Each part is assigned a number that says how much drag it has.

False alarm but I think we should try and get a few former astronauts and NASA employees to run in 2014 just to be safe.

Obama could try to boost his popularity by trying to throw more funding at NASA.

If it's true then falcon heavy is gonna have some big competition

Link lead me to CNNs page not found message.

Our military would use money on fractional bombardment system or kinetic rod strike array not a nuclear capable moon base.

Heck we already pulled out of the anti ballistic missile treaty and militarization of space has already started with the 3 world military powers working on ASAT weapons.

I always thought that the way to go would be something similar to what you had described and was demonstrated in MSG:00. One long cylinder with multiple maglev tracks inside.

We'll then let's avoid the whole situation all together and not have nukes in a moon base

Weapons of any kind in space could spark a new arms race and Cold War with other countries wanting to "close the nuclear moon bas gap."

I wouldn't be setting your sights on china if I were you just because the way the governent is there. Spacex is off the ground and is making great strides in reusability. DARPA will only let you make something if it can be weaponized and will be the ones soaking up the money that used to be NASAs budget...

We'll if you transmit the data to a satellite it still has to go somewhere else like a dedicated data center where said data from the planes black box could just as easily be tampered with. And the costs of maintaining a system constantly monitoring every flight very day would be astronomical.

MAVEN is already sitting in orbit waiting for the transfer window they won't cancel it after spending the money to launch it to not have it at least attempt it's mission.