r4pt0r

Mods are for idiots and the only way to play is 100% stock. Have I taught you nothing?!?

I am resurrecting this thread, because Space engineers added planets, and some new enemies to the game(think starship troopers ) I have not played it in months, but They seem to have been putting in WORK, and I might just have to get into this again. Incredible.

Here is 146 pages of people being unhappy with curse: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/79011-The-Curse-Thread/page146 Here is the profile of our official ksp curse forum representative, not online since december of last year: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/members/113472-Kaelten Here is that same representative, saying (in december of last year) that they are behind schedule for curse KSP support: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/102310-When-will-the-Curse-client-support-KSP?p=1606708#post1606708 Most here just wanted a "spaceport 2", but Squad got into bed with Curse, so whatever.

ah, very good. that site seemed shady to me.

Is that official squad merch? because if its not, and you just alerted squad to the existence of illicit plushies, and another entrepreneur will have their business venture killed.

I dislike PSA's on principal, can people stop doing that please.

yassssss

ahh, ok I think I understand that

This is something that has confused me. why wouldn't the bits stay coalesced, shouldn't their combined mass draw enough gravity to keep them together? Or is this sort of like a way smaller scale event horizon sort of thing, and they are getting essentially spagettified, because Mars pulling them apart is stronger than the weak pull of the separate bits?

We now have the ability to explore offworld seas, there should be something when we are there. maybe not necessarily alien animals or plantlife, but something to make the destination exciting. I've been interested in a realworld mission to explore Titans seas for a long time, but anything has yet to come of that. https://www.nasa.gov/content/titan-submarine-exploring-the-depths-of-kraken/

Idont think it needs to be so convuluted, just have them spew gibberish and banter back and fourth a bit. something like: if kerbals are seated in the same pod, banter chance once every 60 seconds. if EVA'd and within 20 feet of another kerbal, banter chance once every 30 seconds. if EVA'd and alone, banter chance once every 90 seconds. Then just record some simlish Kerblish speak I mean really its just spanish played backwards, and processed a bit. The devs could even get cutesy with it, and (en espaniol) say nice things about the community, or messages to loved ones, then use those audio samples for the gibberish. This is all just a long way to say make Chatterer stock. That would be prefered as I like the back and fourth with KSC

Sorry but this is a short topic detour. Regex I was on Facebook the other day, and I saw the KSP page post this, and I thought of you(since you already think stock size is toy sized ). On topic however, I suggest Vall.

This is what the future looks like. Good work RIC.

You can do that, because those all branch off the asteroid separately, but to have 1 craft grab the asteroid from 2 places at once did not work. Its hard to explain without visual aids.

On the offhand chance we discuss features in here, does anyone know if we can use multiple claws on the same asteroid yet? as in a giant triopod with claws on each prong? Its been a long while since I played with asteroids, and I was wondering if we can yet. If not, will that be a 1.1 thing?

I like this, I would never ever move one, but it would be a epic looking base

They intend to release 1.1 near Christmas? Last time we got a new planet was near Christmas. I'm just saying. GAS PLANET 2 PLEASE

I always give 1 star ratings to ideas I don't like. If they are bad Ideas I comment to express my disdain, and slap a 1 star on it, primarily as there is no 0-star option. Is it because I am butthurt about something? not in the least. In fact it seems I can take 30 seconds of my time and just 2 clicks to upset someone with a stupid idea. I call that a win.

Yes. The majority always take precedence. Catering to the minority is always bad.

Yeah KSP has been my only positive early access experience, and unfortunately my negative experiences far outweigh the lone good one, so I will not opt in to any future early access titles. which is awful because no one knows who the next big thing will be.

It would be a fun project to try, creating a ship that can just assemble a long train of: :Orange tank: : Docking Port Sr: : Docking Port Sr: : Orange tank: : Docking Port Sr: : Docking Port Sr: : Orange tank: : Docking Port Sr: : Docking Port Sr: : Orange tank: and so on... Just make sure your assembly craft has all the thrusters, putting them on the orange tanks would add up very quickly.

I would say there are many many graphical improvements I would put miles ahead of adding various baubles and persons in the KSC building.

clearly they need to focus on launching first eh?

I always pause and shift+tab to the steam browser, works just fine for me.

I'll have to watch the star wars movies sometime before this new one comes out. Honestly more excited for Spectre.