Nemrav

nope -21

-21 noooooooo

-10....

Haha we got this ! -7 Also you are creating confusion by stating there is confusion, so just let people edit their posts accordingly... then we wont have side fights.. edit : by the below logic, because of logical confusion of logic concerning logic I declare 2^100 to be our number

-6 I will spam post until we win !!!

-5 we can do this !

-5 trololol

-5 lololo

nope, I write my own programs... The person below me knows python...

-8 hAHA, THIS THREAD WILL SEE THE LIGHT AGAIN OOPS ACCIDENTALY HIT CAPS LOCK, OH WELL

-13 We can do this !

0/10 First time I've seen u

-18 take that neo-GIC minions !

Let's go positives -27

-32 And Remember this is only episode V (IV was GIC) there will a six, where all numbers will be positive !

noo the green will not rise again !!! -31

Its -18 of course epc maz skilz 4 smrt poples

you shall not pass -20 -20

negative two point O

neat way to get around the 10 char limit -2

actually we will -3

But... when we times a negative 1 by a 1 negative, we get a positive 1. -2

banned for korolev shuttle and gif avatar

They should be nerfed in some way so that we will use fins to turn rockets and rcs for large ships in space an equal part of the time as we do the wheels. as of now, if we need to turn any sized ship in any amount of time, you just use reaction wheels... Wouldn't mind seeing a bit of build-up on the wheels, but not to the point where the wheels become a useless part nobody uses because you can't do anything with them...

I think its not so much that they dont want to give enough info, but they dont want KSP to become a spread sheet game (like eve online/other mmo s' did when they gave too many stats) Also some people have pretty small screens.... side note: when I did FAR in the past, I used the old stock ascent profile just fine, every time too, so FAR is also "whine whine whine, unrealistic trash, whine" (stereo-typical KSP argument profile, not yours...)