Nemrav

four ftw

due to confusion we rev... just go with 1 pls

1 no.1 yes no.1

1 we're done

Turns out my username is... czech-ish The first result on google (just the search, no images) bring up my forum profile, but on the images its just a bunch of people from "Nemrava".....

It was Gregroxx who made that other config too, wonder how long til 0.1% scale...

Did you try multiple launches, and have them all get the Kraken, also what's gilly like ?

4 hahaha...

23 we said, we have bacon up here instead, who cares about cookies

2/10 seen you here and there..

38 then..

41 the next answers most of all

39 FTW 10char

according to regex its realism or bust me: meh, just one type works and in RO I just ended up using random fuels that sounded about right (hydrogen + oxygen) and it got me to orbit just fine... Really, yes unrealistic, but when you have ~30 fuel types, it just ends up being that you can't be bothered.. And just makes KSP one step closer to a spread sheet game where you can't get anywhere without your second moniter, some basic calculus etc. to simply get something up there... edit: srry Regex, but I've... well noticed you like realism a lot...... Let's stop this now.

30+7......

nope VExx

who is on track ? 22

17 muahahaha

magnets ?

air , oxygen its some type of common invisible gas (I think...)

2 !!!!!!

okay, Il edit this post when I get my next lunatic concept off the ground in stock But only when the new rules are stated... Maybe specific types of aircraft such as rotor / vtol / dragon / triplane / biplane / physicsless part plane....

erm... the 3/4 of a century + naming throws me off.... 3/4 century ago would mean 1940.. So something invented in the war... Jerrycans ?

-108 dual post spammers by the looks of it...

-24 The positives will rise again !