Jump to content

Jaxx

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    222

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

5 Neutral

Profile Information

  • About me
    Spacecraft Engineer
  1. Jaxx
    Is there a consideration to a balance pass of the RC-0 Smobodobodyne Slim to be higher in the tech tree? For example, CTT has it in regular Electrics, but its closest competitor for probe core is the just-unlocked Probodobodyne OKTO in Basic Science, but the Slim is cheaper, lighter, and has every single attitude preset available from the get-go, whereas the OKTO and even the next core only has SAS and Pro/Retro. Maybe adjusting it a bit further in to reflect its capability? If the concern is for usability with the telescope, by the time you get the 2nd tier of processing units, you tend to have the target attitude capable cores there, so tier 1 would just be Kerbin system moons, or if you really wanted others, just being very precise manually with SAS.
  2. Jaxx
    Would it be possible to extend the functional purpose of this mod to also include Kerbal Atomics' engines? As an example, the LV-NGX from it despite being a 2.5m long-burn nuclear sustain engine has a paltry 10 minute burn time and only 5 ignitions.
  3. Jaxx
    Any chance of getting a look into making it so placed but *not* deployed ground station parts are no longer interactable? :^) Like grabbing a photovoltaic unit, but only placing it on the ground without deploying it, making it unable to be ever picked up again
  4. Jaxx
    to confirm, if we wanted to utilize Textures Unlimited, Textures Unlimited Recolour Depot, LazyPainter, and the various configuration for other mods, all in tandem, we use the newest version of TU to make that work?
  5. Jaxx
    I believe this mod may be causing the CactEye Large Telescope Tube/FungEye Telescope parts to be pruned from their respective categories in the main section? I was only able to find them in the categorization by manufacturer instead of the main parts listing.
  6. Jaxx
    the mod works great as far as i can discern, but there's this very odd effect when looking directly at kerbol of a defined "edge" of the sunflare that is kind of disorienting. is it just my setup that causes this or is it always like this? you can see it more clearly defined on the left hand side example image
  7. Jaxx
    posting to share that i'm experiencing the same problem as a previous user was, full sized Drill-O-Matics will not show as having ground contact arbitrarily for individual resources and materials, despite others in the same drill showing as having it, and despite the Junior version of the drill having contact just fine. seeking help with that or a full fix that someone has found. https://i.gyazo.com/f203b254483f74f8980023c384d87b57.png
  8. Jaxx
    god bless. i got the slim navball markers for a cleaner look but a lot of them are actually too difficult to see, especially in the context of the alternate navball textures offered by other mods, so the customization of this is perfect.
  9. Jaxx
    This sounds like a wildly cool idea. I'm guessing it doesn't play nicely with Strategia/Custom Barn Kit? Might have to pop it on for my next save.
  10. Jaxx
    Unsure if there's a more appropriate place to notify this, but the Kerbal Krash System mod is listed as "N/A" for game version it works with, but it hasn't worked with any version in almost....2 years? So adding it to a new clean install has it just doing nothing, despite it being listed as compatible. Not sure if there can be just a manual game version for compatibility added (I think KSP version 1.10.0 based on the forum post?) but it would be nice so people don't get confused why it doesn't work. Or, if I'm somehow just an idiot who's making it not work, that would be good to know too.
  11. Jaxx
    Thank you for being as exact in your instructions as you were as it was very helpful; I did all those steps and everything is correct and exactly as you quoted it. I went ahead and did a top-to-bottom reinstall just in case with wiping game/mod folders to redownload it, and it seems to be working now??? I was getting this message still but I am unsure if it is related or not. Which may be B9 being broken in some way? But I'm unsure if it's affecting the IVA Switch specifically. Either way, it's working so I'm grateful. Now if only I could figure out why my right click likes to randomly break and not show menus anymore...probably a memory issue somewhere...
  12. Jaxx
    Sorry, my fault :') https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/p2lk9sw60vp1j5j0kro50/KSP.log?rlkey=w3bcq9wrsub5jbtbj0v8fvqzc&dl=0 e: Specifically the Mk1 Command Pod has no alternate versions, I just tested out the 4 pods I have access to and the Mk1 Cockpit DOES have its alternate versions.
  13. Jaxx
    Hello! So, I haven't booted up KSP in some time and wanted to hop back on and went through CKAN for a refresh on mods and saw this and popped it on, with these relevant IVA mods as well: But on going into both the VAB and in-flight, I just don't get an option for changing IVA's? And the default IVA look is the basic 3-RPM-monitors setup that I remember from a long time ago. Not sure if I'm doing it wrong but any ideas would be appreciated, or if anyone's had this issue previously. A cursory look at the KSP log didn't seem to have any errors related to Reviva but I may be wrong.
  14. Jaxx
    what was the target file path for the message log the mod mentions when it throws an error?
  15. Jaxx
    Hello! Would asking here, or on Kerbalism's page be more appropriate for the question of potential interfacing with that mod's science overhauled system? Or would it be so wildly different so as to be a moot question? Thinking about if it would be easier to just put in a feature request to have this mod's basic idea (a single menu for available science experiments on vessel) for that mod, or if this would still be able to have functional compatibility.
×
×
  • Create New...