Jump to content

mdapol

Members
  • Posts

    265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mdapol

  1. Ok, so with the new Kronometer, Trajectories appears to be working. Still doesn't show up in the Toolbar (or in Toolbar Config) but that might be the toolbar.dat file. I'll try deleting it and running again. Question though, is the only GUI for Trajectories via the Toolbar button?
  2. Trajectories doesn't show up in the list for Toolbar Controller. So, no. It doesn't show up in Blizzy toolbar either. Deleting the toolbar.dat file changed nothing.
  3. @linuxgurugamer So I tried your suggestion. After reloading a clean install I noticed that there were two MiniAvc.log files still present. I tracked it down to two mods that ZeroMiniAVC is apparently missing: RecoveryController and KIS. KIS uses something called MiniAVC-V2.dll. I manually pruned both of those and now I don't get any MiniAVC logs being generated. I also do not get the exception in Trajectories in the KSP.log file. However I still don't see the Trajectories mod in the Toolbar in the Space Center view or in the Tracking Station view. Player.log is here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/htybjlqavqozcme/Player.log?dl=0 KSP.log is here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/vkp26espzad8b0z/KSP.log?dl=0
  4. What is a Player.log? I'll try your suggestion and report back.
  5. I am using ZeroMiniAVC. It runs every time I start KSP. And everything I have is added from CKAN. Still getting that exception. There must be some other reason.
  6. @linuxgurugamer No success. Uninstalled those mods and still get the same exception. [LOG 08:52:12.154] [Trajectories] v2.4.1 Starting [ERR 08:52:12.159] Exception loading ScenarioModule Trajectories: System.TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for 'Trajectories.Settings' threw an exception. ---> System.Reflection.ReflectionTypeLoadException: Exception of type 'System.Reflection.ReflectionTypeLoadException' was thrown. at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.Assembly.GetTypes(System.Reflection.Assembly,bool) at System.Reflection.Assembly.GetTypes () [0x00000] in <9577ac7a62ef43179789031239ba8798>:0 at AssemblyLoader+LoadedAssembyList.GetPathByType (System.Type type) [0x00020] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at AssemblyLoader.GetPathByType (System.Type type) [0x00000] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at KSP.IO.IOUtils.GetFilePathFor (System.Type T, System.String file, Vessel flight) [0x00005] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at KSP.IO.PluginConfiguration.CreateForType[T] (Vessel flight) [0x00000] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at Trajectories.Settings..cctor () [0x00007] in <54b43012425c4547b2c53f8eb9f179ca>:0 --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Object.__icall_wrapper_mono_generic_class_init(intptr) at Trajectories.Trajectories.OnLoad (ConfigNode node) [0x0000b] in <54b43012425c4547b2c53f8eb9f179ca>:0 at ScenarioModule.Load (ConfigNode node) [0x0000e] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at ScenarioRunner.AddModule (ConfigNode node) [0x0005e] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 As you can see, I have ZeroMiniAVC installed already. [LOG 08:45:24.392] [AddonLoader]: Instantiating addon 'ZeroMiniAVC' from assembly 'ZeroMiniAVC' [LOG 08:45:24.396] ZeroMiniAVC: Awake Any more ideas? KSP log here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/d5qlbftp8ylukap/KSP.log?dl=0
  7. @linuxgurugamer I have ZeroMiniAVC installed already. That is not the issue. @mhoram I also have ClickThroughBlocker and ToolbarControl installed already and still have the issue. I will try uninstalling RCSBuildAid and TacFuelBalancer (separately) and see what happens. I install everything via CKAN which should handle addon requirements like this (usually)
  8. I'm getting this error in my 1.12.1 game with Trajectories 2.4.1 [LOG 19:53:04.415] [Trajectories] v2.4.1 Starting [ERR 19:53:04.420] Exception loading ScenarioModule Trajectories: System.TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for 'Trajectories.Settings' threw an exception. ---> System.Reflection.ReflectionTypeLoadException: Exception of type 'System.Reflection.ReflectionTypeLoadException' was thrown. at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.Assembly.GetTypes(System.Reflection.Assembly,bool) at System.Reflection.Assembly.GetTypes () [0x00000] in <9577ac7a62ef43179789031239ba8798>:0 at AssemblyLoader+LoadedAssembyList.GetPathByType (System.Type type) [0x00020] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at AssemblyLoader.GetPathByType (System.Type type) [0x00000] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at KSP.IO.IOUtils.GetFilePathFor (System.Type T, System.String file, Vessel flight) [0x00005] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at KSP.IO.PluginConfiguration.CreateForType[T] (Vessel flight) [0x00000] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at Trajectories.Settings..cctor () [0x00007] in <54b43012425c4547b2c53f8eb9f179ca>:0 --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Object.__icall_wrapper_mono_generic_class_init(intptr) at Trajectories.Trajectories.OnLoad (ConfigNode node) [0x0000b] in <54b43012425c4547b2c53f8eb9f179ca>:0 at ScenarioModule.Load (ConfigNode node) [0x0000e] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at ScenarioRunner.AddModule (ConfigNode node) [0x0005e] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 KSP Log: https://www.dropbox.com/s/d5qlbftp8ylukap/KSP.log?dl=0
  9. Getting this error in my 1.12.1 game: [LOG 19:53:04.415] [Trajectories] v2.4.1 Starting [ERR 19:53:04.420] Exception loading ScenarioModule Trajectories: System.TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for 'Trajectories.Settings' threw an exception. ---> System.Reflection.ReflectionTypeLoadException: Exception of type 'System.Reflection.ReflectionTypeLoadException' was thrown. at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.Assembly.GetTypes(System.Reflection.Assembly,bool) at System.Reflection.Assembly.GetTypes () [0x00000] in <9577ac7a62ef43179789031239ba8798>:0 at AssemblyLoader+LoadedAssembyList.GetPathByType (System.Type type) [0x00020] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at AssemblyLoader.GetPathByType (System.Type type) [0x00000] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at KSP.IO.IOUtils.GetFilePathFor (System.Type T, System.String file, Vessel flight) [0x00005] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at KSP.IO.PluginConfiguration.CreateForType[T] (Vessel flight) [0x00000] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at Trajectories.Settings..cctor () [0x00007] in <54b43012425c4547b2c53f8eb9f179ca>:0 --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Object.__icall_wrapper_mono_generic_class_init(intptr) at Trajectories.Trajectories.OnLoad (ConfigNode node) [0x0000b] in <54b43012425c4547b2c53f8eb9f179ca>:0 at ScenarioModule.Load (ConfigNode node) [0x0000e] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0 at ScenarioRunner.AddModule (ConfigNode node) [0x0005e] in <cd473063d3a2482f8d93d388d0c95035>:0
  10. I noticed a bug with JNSQ. When you go to the Tracking Station and look at the information for the planetary body, the rotational period is given in "days, hours" but is using the default 6 hour day.
  11. Does anyone have a good Kerbalism Config file for a JNSQ game? I tried modifying the default config and none of the capsules are showing any life support. P.S. I have ProbesBeforeCrew also which might be screwing with things.
  12. Thanks but I wasn't trying to combine them. I am only interested in JNSQ and I don't know how OPM got installed.
  13. Thank you very much. That looks a lot less chaotic of a system.
  14. Am I supposed to have OPM installed and if so, am I supposed to delete the OPM planet config files? I have it installed for some reason (CKAN??)
  15. Is Sarnus supposed to be in the JNSQ system? Or do I have a bad install somewhere?
  16. Thanks, I appreciate it. In the meantime I’d like to look into it myself. Could someone tell me where in the Kerbalism code it handles the current experiment result messages?
  17. I guess I’m not quite understanding you. There already is a way to map the science messages. IIRC, the stock Science Config file has a list of all messages organized by experiment an location. All that would be needed is to read in the file and convert it to whatever format Kerbalism uses. Can you explain what I’m missing? And could you point me to where in the code the Kerbalism science messages are generated and displayed? Thanks.
  18. I like the new science system in general, but I was wondering if there is any way to configure Kerbalism to display the Stock Science Messages instead of those blandly generic messages when an experiment completes? Or if not, could that be done?
  19. It seems to me that the current mod is not really compatible with the basic Tech Tree. In the sense that you're getting rockets that are way, way overpowered too early in the tech tree. Most of them seem to show up in Basic Rocketry with is not consistent with stock. Are there any plans to configure the parts to fit the stock tech tree better? And after that perhaps the Community Tech Tree?
  20. Has the issue where a probe that has not been focussed in a long time (and the relay satellite has not been focussed in a long time) will become stuck in "Not Connected" state even though both the probe and the relay are (1) pointed at each other, (2) in range, and (3) have clear LOS been solved yet? My Jool probes will quite reliably get "Not Connected" since I don't look at them for a while, requiring me to edit the persistant file to force them back into "Connected" state. I have reported this problem before but I haven't been on the forum for a while so I was wondering if this issue has been fixed, or will be fixed for 0.24?
  21. Has the issue where a probe that has not been focussed in a long time (and the relay satellite has not been focussed in a long time) will become stuck in "Not Connected" state even though both the probe and the relay are (1) pointed at each other, (2) in range, and (3) have clear LOS been solved yet? My Jool probes will quite reliably get "Not Connected" since I don't look at them for a while, requiring me to edit the persistant file to force them back into "Connected" state. I have reported this problem before but I haven't been on the forum for a while so I was wondering if this issue has been fixed, or will be fixed for 0.24?
  22. I respectfully disagree. I'm already getting way too much science in the standard career mode as it is. In my next career game, I think I'm going to have to double the cost of all science tiers to make it more realistic. If you do you do this, at least make it optional so that people can turn it off please.
  23. B9 hasn't "stopped being updated". There's an update in the works in fact.
×
×
  • Create New...