Jump to content

"Eve: Order Zero" -- a KSP Graphic Novel (POSTLUDE COMPLETE...bet you didn't see THAT coming.)


Recommended Posts

Interlude part 2 of 3:

http://i.imgur.com/WuC062t.png

http://i.imgur.com/3Zitvtz.png

http://i.imgur.com/Jo8sCsr.png

http://i.imgur.com/F60uFna.png

Now I'm sure you have a lot of questions... none of which I'm going to answer :D But feel free to speculate wildly, I left you some good clues and I think someone will figure it all out. :)

Mirror, Mirror, on the wall. Who is the most back-Sward of them all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look closer at that name, people. Not Kerman.

Fear the Kermulan Star Empire

HA, nice catch, I didn't see that one.

OK...who would be crazy enough to send an armed SSTO to orbit just to vaporise one helpless person?

I dunno, the Keringons? Then again, code of honor and stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK...who would be crazy enough to send an armed SSTO to orbit just to vaporise one helpless person?

Oh, but this is delicious! I can say this: there is not enough information in those four pages to answer your question definitively, Scotius... but there is more than enough to definitively say who did not... and I still don't think anyone has spotted the biggest clue :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, but this is delicious! I can say this: there is not enough information in those four pages to answer your question definitively, Scotius... but there is more than enough to definitively say who did not... and I still don't think anyone has spotted the biggest clue :D

I feel like it is Mort.... As that would be the opposite to what Kenlie thought...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, but this is delicious! I can say this: there is not enough information in those four pages to answer your question definitively, Scotius... but there is more than enough to definitively say who did not... and I still don't think anyone has spotted the biggest clue :D

Would that be the fact that you edited the 90 (or 60?) on the runway to 27?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or maybe, that wouldn't make sense, as Mort gets funds from rescuing stranded kerbs..... Maybe it's the companies (that we've never heard of before) that the kerbals are ditching for kerbfleet! The companies could be rivals, and they wouldn't want kerbfleet to get those funds.... Maybe they're also spiteful that they are loosing their kerbals..... It wouldn't be Mort though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did notice that the interceptor ship took off from runway 27 instead of 09- dunno if that's relevant. I wonder what will happen if whoever's piloting the interceptor figures out that the missing/target Kermulan is no longer aboard the wreck...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, page 27 in the thread comes up with nothing....

The problem with that is, which forum setting?

I tried wiki'ng Star Trek TOS episode 27, but that one deals with parallel universes and has nothing to do with the Romulans or otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would that be the fact that you edited the 90 (or 60?) on the runway to 27?

That's different? I didn't notice.

The problem with that is, which forum setting?

I tried wiki'ng Star Trek TOS episode 27, but that one deals with parallel universes and has nothing to do with the Romulans or otherwise.

Is it mirror, mirror? That one's about parallel universes where starfleet is a militaristic tyranny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could that number be interpreted differently, such as season 2, episode 7? Or could it be flipped around to say L2 instead, and mean something completely different?

Also, I have the feeling this is just a story in Kenlie's head, and that the shooting of the helpless kerbal never happened. We get a good hint that the pod the kerbal to be rescued is in is different from the pod the kerbal got blown up in, and Kenlie implying that it is just a story in his head.

Though with the way Kuzzter is addressing this...

Edited by Noname117
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could that number be interpreted differently, such as season 2, episode 7? Or could it be flipped around to say L2 instead, and mean something completely different?

I thought of the season 2, episode 7 thing, no match. I had also thought maybe production code 27, but no match either. Maybe the 27 is a red herring.

Edited by smjjames
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...