Jump to content

Massive black hole found


Atlas2342

Recommended Posts

During a routine testing of a telescope, scientists find a big black hole that was formed by three spiral galaxies colliding...

7359320-3x2-940x627.jpg

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-27/monster-black-hole-formed-by-trio-of-colliding-galaxies/7359340

Its a black hole, 3 billion times the mass of the sun. What more could you ask for? :D

Edited by Atlas2342
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 galaxies lost.

3 billion Sun masses at once.

And it is just (2 * 3e9 * 2e30 * 6.67e-11/(3e8 ^ 2)) / 1.5e11 = 60 AU in radius.

And its density is just (3e9*2e30/((4*pi*(60*1.5e11)^3)/3)) = 2 kg/m3. Twice more dense than air.

How the world is unjust...

Edited by kerbiloid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, kerbiloid said:

3 galaxies lost.

3 billion Sun masses at once.

And it is just (2 * 3e9 * 2e30 * 6.67e-11/(3e8 ^ 2)) / 1.5e11 = 60 AU in radius.

And its density is just (3e9*2e30/((4*pi*(60*1.5e11)^3)/3)) = 2 kg/m3. Twice more dense than air.

How the world is unjust...

I know right?! I have to watch my calorie intake so closely, and yet this black hole can eat so much but still so slim, astronomically speaking.

Edited by RainDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RainDreamer said:

I know right?! I have to watch my calorie intake so closely, and yet this black hole can eat so much but still so slim, astrologically speaking.

I hope you're slimmer than 60 AU... :D

 

Edited by cubinator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Spaceception said:

3 galaxies? How big is it? Would it dwarf Milkomeda?

Not three galaxies, the collision of three galaxies, I think we are getting galaxy size and black hole size confused. Big black holes need not be at the center of huge galaxies or mergent galaxies. And holes don't merge often until well after the galaxies have merged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bleah, the news site managed to have a broken link to MNRAS, and didn't make it obvious that they had one to the actual paper. Also, the image is of the antennae galaxies, rather than the actual collision because reasons?

 

edit, 3.8e9 M☉ likely isn't much compared to the galaxies as a whole, but I'm having trouble finding any figures on stellar or halo mass.

Edited by UmbralRaptor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...