Jump to content

The v1.2 Hype Train Thread - Prerelease is Out

Whirligig Girl

By Whirligig Girl
in KSP1 Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Andem

Andem

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 9/9/2016 at 1:05 AM, passinglurker said:

It's clear, but just to be clear I disagree. This picture was clearly taken as part of a physics based render test not a promotions shot so I'd say you don't have enough to go off of to really say they don't fit. I also think  they fit the space planes to the extent that they need to, but there is no pleasing everyone.

If these had been just butts and nozzels like the vector or the thud the other half of the player base would be rioting right now demanding thier pipey rocket porn instead :P (personally I don't care either way on the tank butt vs. buttless debate)

As for kerbals they can be improved they are flexible. The planet's are an unreasonable expectation dirt and rocket parts are apples and oranges. The rest of the present non-spaceplane parts are irrelevant they are essentially slated for replacement.

Expand  

That isn't my point either, I guess it's just really hard to convey. I like that they have actual engines, but everything about them as parts looks off to me, in a way that totally breaks what little immersion you get from KSP. Immersion is very important to me, and, at this stage of the game (no pun intended), without a complete game overhaul or significant changes to the parts, they completely jut out as different in a bad way.

  On 9/9/2016 at 1:16 AM, RoverDude said:

That's good, because usually when someone says something like "Ripped" it implies "ripped off".  Thank you for clarifying.

And by all means, express your opinion.  And I'll express mine.  A dogpile on an artist, regardless of whether they work for squad or not, is just not cool.  And a lot of this thread became a dogpile.  

Expand  

And I definitely don't intend to be hating on Porkjet, I love all of his work, and those engines are beautiful, they just don't work with the rest of the game as they currently exist. The bigger issue is that it's hard to say specifically what the problem is. Part of it is definitely the current textures, and I think that it's a little bit too detailed as well.

Edited by Andem
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
  On 9/9/2016 at 2:03 AM, Andem said:

Part of it is definitely the current textures, and I think that it's a little bit too detailed as well.

Expand  

It's the PBR, all the parts will eventually look like that if they move over to using it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
XB-70A

XB-70A

Posted
Posted
  On 9/9/2016 at 1:14 AM, Temeter said:

Pls, it's historic

Expand  

Again, for the second time, I am not against the choice of placing an aspirator but its shape. I don't like the form it got on the Swivel, it brakes the lines of the nozzle.

To be more precise here is what I talk about :

Rtcv3wD.png

Even the RL-105 got this curve with the aspirator.

Now here is what I see with this new LV-T45 :

KHxrzVv.png

This aesthetic does not suit to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Temeter

Temeter

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 9/9/2016 at 2:10 AM, XB-70A said:

Again, for the second time, I am not against the choice of placing an aspirator but its shape. I don't like the form it got on the Swivel, it brakes the lines of the nozzle.

To be more precise here is what I talk about :

[...]

Even the RL-105 got this curve with the aspirator.

Now here is what I see with this new LV-T45 :

[...]

This aesthetic does not suit to me.

Expand  

Look, the H-1 engine also has the inward bulging at the lower part of the nozzle, if not as accentuated. It's pretty obvious the model is supposed to resemble this engine.

H-1_rocket_engine.jpg

Of course I see you don't like it, but I got quite used to this design when playing RO.^^

A lot ugly of spacetech really grows on you over time. Like the Space Shuttle >:D

Edited by Temeter
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Temeter

Temeter

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 9/9/2016 at 2:21 AM, Andem said:

Perhaps. I'm really just not entirely sure, though I would imagine that's playing a large role.

Expand  

I think it's both the combination of a more detailed style and better lighting. That goes a huge way at changing how things look.

Seen actually quite similar stuff in cartoon looking games over the years, e.g. how the Ratchet and Clanks transitioned from PS2 to PS3. And KSP's old material is reeeeeeally low res.

That's not to say the style didn't change, more that it's often unavoidable. And every artist will have his own way to update things.

Edited by Temeter
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NoMrBond

NoMrBond

Posted
Posted

There seems to be an assumption the 5 engines shown in that one leaked picture are the sum total of the 'overhaul', which feels off (to me), like they'd ask Porkjet to do just 5 parts and not a cohesive overhaul?

Maybe I'm assuming to much to believe the Skipper, Mainsail, Poodle and fuel tanks etc have also been done, in addition to the few pictured (and perhaps some other spots filled, which the presence of the LVT-15 and LV-303 suggest).

I guess we'll find out the full extent pretty soon, I'm quite looking forward to seeing Porkjets new stuff in game (even if we need to side-load it) alongside everything else which is coming in 1.2.  With a side order of wondering whether they're using the existing shaders, or whether they've gotten the Standard Shader to work with KSP's camera hierarchy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
XB-70A

XB-70A

Posted
Posted
  On 9/9/2016 at 2:15 AM, Temeter said:

Look, the H-1 engine also has the inward bulging at the lower part of the nozzle, if not as accentuated. It's pretty obvious the model is supposed to resemble this engine.

Expand  

To me the H-1 aspirator part just got a small difference of curves with the nozzle and is still round.

At the opposite I see the Swivel aspirator mades with three different angles. Something like 30 degrees, 90 then and a rounded end.

  On 9/9/2016 at 2:15 AM, Temeter said:

A lot ugly of spacetech really grows on you over time.

Expand  

Alas, if the concept of beauty and ugliness were not individual, fewer conflicts here would occured... a some of us who got bored by some philosophers would have more good times without these boring band like Hegel, Kant or even this dark prince of Nietzsche sometimes.

  On 9/9/2016 at 2:15 AM, Temeter said:

Like the Space Shuttle >:D

Expand  

HOW DARE YOU ?! You should be roasted by an RS-25 as a punishment :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GarrisonChisholm

GarrisonChisholm

Posted
Posted
  On 9/6/2016 at 7:31 PM, HoloYolo said:

Ready to rumble. 1.2 better be worth it.

Expand  

This is an example of one of the rare cases when someone's avatar perfectly reflects the enthusiasm of their comment.  :]

 

Gosh, it would be nice if I could roll a plane down the runway at greater than 35 m/sec...here's hoping!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Temeter

Temeter

Posted
Posted
  On 9/9/2016 at 2:47 AM, XB-70A said:

HOW DARE YOU ?! You should be roasted by an RS-25 as a punishment :D

Expand  

RS25rocket4.jpg

Guy that made the engine must have been mental. Sane people don't build stuf like this!

 

For real tho, you'll get used to it surely. Or maybe Squad doesn't implement the engines like this at all. No clue what's going on there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Superfluous J

Superfluous J

Posted
Posted (edited)

[snip] I'm saying spending hours nitpicking every pixel on a single image of parts that's not even a screenshot from the game itself is not just a colossal waste of time on the forum goers' side of it, but at BEST it'll just cause the artist to give up on Squad's side of things. THAT is what is not a great strategy.

Edited by Vanamonde
References to removed posts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
XB-70A

XB-70A

Posted
Posted
  On 9/9/2016 at 2:52 AM, Alshain said:

I think it was inspired by the Redstone rocket

Expand  

Thanks Alshain, this picture perfectly summarize what I was thinking about.

  On 9/9/2016 at 2:52 AM, Temeter said:

Guy that made the engine must have been mental. Sane people don't build stuf like this!

Expand  

Pretty true, after all a quote said the main difference between a genius and a madman is the genius is recognized. Here the team we made this wonder stays in the shadow. Apart for some rocketry addicts.

  On 9/9/2016 at 2:52 AM, Temeter said:

For real tho, you'll get used to it surely.

Expand  

I hope so... honestly I still don't have use the Puff and Twin Boar more for their appearances than usefulness...

photo-thumb-43205.jpg?_r=1388090542

I should re-use this picture as the profile one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Diche Bach

Diche Bach

Posted
Posted (edited)

Just remember. This update is free. You guys are poodleing about free stuff.

Squad should start charging a couple bucks and extra for the poodleing.

Poodling!? :sticktongue: LOL, why not "Dachsunding" or "Basset Hounding!" :D

Edited by Diche Bach
liked the joke
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Speeding Mullet

Speeding Mullet

Posted
Posted
  On 9/9/2016 at 3:45 AM, Diche Bach said:

A word the forum software apparently uses to replace a common vernacular English term for "complaining" which begins with a B and is also an infinitive verb conjugation of the technical term for a female canine :D

Expand  

there's a Troy Pierce track which would become 25 poodles in that case :D.

Back on the rails - there's plenty here which is very exciting to me.  Kerbnet is particularly welcome to me as I've never really bothered finding out where the biomes were before now, but I will surely give it a science this time around!

SM

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...