Solar Ranger Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 10 minutes ago, StarCrusher96 said: Not yet but it will be by tomorrow Great. thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andi K. Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 18 hours ago, StarCrusher96 said: A pretty death for Korlon. Very, very cool. The question is, how did you make it? It looks like you created a texture for the nebula and set it as a corona for the star. Would it be better if I PMed you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarCrusher96 Posted February 11, 2017 Author Share Posted February 11, 2017 3 hours ago, AndrewDrawsPrettyPictures said: Very, very cool. The question is, how did you make it? It looks like you created a texture for the nebula and set it as a corona for the star. Would it be better if I PMed you? no prob, I used scatterer for it :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andi K. Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, StarCrusher96 said: no prob, I used scatterer for it Yeah I just had an epiphany after I posted that and thought, "Wait. SCATTERER!" Scatterer is a godsend. I don't know why I hadn't thought of that before. Now I can add the Helix Nebula into Constellations. Yay! Edited February 11, 2017 by AndrewDrawsPrettyPictures Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarCrusher96 Posted February 11, 2017 Author Share Posted February 11, 2017 14 minutes ago, AndrewDrawsPrettyPictures said: Yeah I just had an epiphany after I posted that and thought, "Wait. SCATTERER!" Scatterer is a godsend. I don't know why I hadn't thought of that before. Now I can add the Helix Nebula into Constellations. Yay! the only 'problem' is that the nebula can't be a 'stationary object' , the texture moves with you like the flares in every direction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andi K. Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 25 minutes ago, StarCrusher96 said: the only 'problem' is that the nebula can't be a 'stationary object' , the texture moves with you like the flares in every direction Yeah I'm aware. Minor problem though considering how cool it is to have a nebula in KSP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarCrusher96 Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 1 hour ago, AndrewDrawsPrettyPictures said: Yeah I'm aware. Minor problem though considering how cool it is to have a nebula in KSP. yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shkeiru Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 It the 0.5 in upload ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadeOfMaar Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 Please don't pester the dev for updates, especially as closely as "Is it uploading right now?" When they're good and finished you'll see a post with very large/bold letters clearly announcing it. There's a forum rule against this pestering and you can get reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shkeiru Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 I know i know, just for hurrying him XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Doctor Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 KSP why you no like me? I bet before this is out KSP will update to 1.3 or a beta would be coming soon lol, I have that much bad luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smotheredrun Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 @StarCrusher96 Wow! Very nice progress! Keep it up and TAKE YOUR TIME!! All good things come to us KSP users who show patience. On a side note, "Science Type Stuff" will come much later correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarCrusher96 Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 3 hours ago, smotheredrun said: @StarCrusher96 Wow! Very nice progress! Keep it up and TAKE YOUR TIME!! All good things come to us KSP users who show patience. On a side note, "Science Type Stuff" will come much later correct? Yes writing science is for 0.55/0.6, the amount of planets is a little too high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smotheredrun Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 7 hours ago, StarCrusher96 said: Yes writing science is for 0.55/0.6, the amount of planets is a little too high Copy that. Looking forward to watching more progression. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSpacePotato Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 This looks amazing! Do you have plans to add a tail for the now-comet Minmus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo8648 Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 8 hours ago, StarCrusher96 said: Yes writing science is for 0.55/0.6, the amount of planets is a little too high What do you mean writing science for .55? What kind of science are you talking about? If I were to land on one of the new planets or moons, is there science data available in .45 or .5? Like science data from high, or low orbit, or from the surface, ect?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarCrusher96 Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Voodoo8648 said: What do you mean writing science for .55? What kind of science are you talking about? If I were to land on one of the new planets or moons, is there science data available in .45 or .5? Like science data from high, or low orbit, or from the surface, ect?? there is no science data like you described ... I need to write science for 50 bodies ... Edited February 12, 2017 by StarCrusher96 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solar Ranger Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, StarCrusher96 said: there is no science data like you described ... I need to write science for 50 bodies ... Is it complicated to write science?? Just Curious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarCrusher96 Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, AceCrafted said: Is it complicated to write science?? Just Curious no but it's just a lot of work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solar Ranger Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 1 minute ago, StarCrusher96 said: no but it's just a lot of work ok. take your time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo8648 Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 19 minutes ago, StarCrusher96 said: there is no science data like you described ... I need to write science for 50 bodies ... Does it require coding or is it as simple as editing the config files? If so, I could help to speed the process Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarCrusher96 Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, Voodoo8648 said: Does it require coding or is it as simple as editing the config files? If so, I could help to speed the process It is just writing sentences, but I'm planning to make it like i did with descriptions. So who wants to help can help then. Edited February 12, 2017 by StarCrusher96 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galileo Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 22 minutes ago, StarCrusher96 said: there is no science data like you described ... I need to write science for 50 bodies ... If you didn't write science defs, the game just uses stock ones and replaces the celestial body name. Most of the bodies in GPP just use stock generic science defs. So, there is science data, just not custom ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarCrusher96 Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Galileo said: If you didn't write science defs, the game just uses stock ones and replaces the celestial body name. Most of the bodies in GPP just use stock generic science defs. So, there is science data, just not custom ones. didn't know that?! For some bodies I need to write custom ones :p But good to know!! Edited February 12, 2017 by StarCrusher96 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solar Ranger Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 If you need any help I'm happy to lend a hand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts