Nertea Posted January 24, 2017 Author Share Posted January 24, 2017 43 minutes ago, Zhetaan said: I wouldn't have expected you to do so. But now you don't have to worry about forgetting it again when you do. Yup! I staged things all up for next release so that's at the top of the list :). Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jljonsn Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Yay! Been waiting for this one to revise. Doesn't seem to be functioning in community tech tree, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptor9 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 @Nertea, you wonderful human being! Thanks for going to all this work. It is certainly appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
symmeclept Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Will there be any significant changes to NF Spacecraft that might make updating a problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted January 24, 2017 Author Share Posted January 24, 2017 15 hours ago, jljonsn said: Yay! Been waiting for this one to revise. Doesn't seem to be functioning in community tech tree, though. Doesn't seem to be anything wrong here. 11 hours ago, symmeclept said: Will there be any significant changes to NF Spacecraft that might make updating a problem? Some parts will be deprecated, however they will be done in a "soft" way that will not break crafts. To be completely compatible, avoid the engines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonathanPerregaux Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Any particular reason why "Heat Control" is always separate from, yet synergistic with, Near Future Electrical? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted January 24, 2017 Author Share Posted January 24, 2017 All my mods are synergistic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DStaal Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 58 minutes ago, JonathanPerregaux said: Any particular reason why "Heat Control" is always separate from, yet synergistic with, Near Future Electrical? If you're looking for a reason to keep the separate: Heat Control is a fairly straightfoward set of parts - no new mechanics really, just parts that fill some gaps in stock. Electrical includes two new mechanics, which are very different from stock - and even changes the behavior of other mods to match it's own. (And those other mods are work well with Heat Control.) So giving people the option to not use the new mechanics and just stick with more stock behavior is nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merkov Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 5 hours ago, DStaal said: If you're looking for a reason to keep the separate: Heat Control is a fairly straightfoward set of parts - no new mechanics really, just parts that fill some gaps in stock. Electrical includes two new mechanics, which are very different from stock - and even changes the behavior of other mods to match it's own. (And those other mods are work well with Heat Control.) So giving people the option to not use the new mechanics and just stick with more stock behavior is nice. An example of this: I love the extra EC capacity of the batteries in NFE, but don't want the new NFE mechanics. So, what I do is delete everything except the batteries from the NFE folder, and then rename the folder to prevent other mods' MM patches from seeing it with :NEEDS conditions. This isn't terribly difficult, but it's basically what anyone who wanted extra radiators but not NFE would have to do every time they installed a new update. It also isn't a very elegant solution (not to mention that I'm pretty sure that renaming folders and chopping out subfolders from NFE puts me firmly in the "do this at your own risk" zone ) By comparison, downloading one mod if you want one vs two mods if you want two is a VERY simple solution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LatiMacciato Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 I love the updates, and adore that you continue the work on NF at all something that spams when a reactor is running: [LOG 15:09:11.534] IN: edited EnrichedUranium ratio to 2.7149999368703E-05 (I assume this is a known thing) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kobymaru Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 1 hour ago, LatiMacciato said: I love the updates, and adore that you continue the work on NF at all something that spams when a reactor is running: [LOG 15:09:11.534] IN: edited EnrichedUranium ratio to 2.7149999368703E-05 Same Problem here. I have RoverDude's MKS suite installed, if that's relevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LatiMacciato Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Just now, Kobymaru said: Same Problem here. I have RoverDude's MKS suite installed, if that's relevant. yap, same here too .. it occoured when I figured to update to the latest NF stuffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streetwind Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) @LatiMacciato @Kobymaru Can you replicate it with only NFE and its dependencies, in a fresh KSP installation? That'll help narrow down if it's a cross-mod issue or a NFE-internal one. Edited January 25, 2017 by Streetwind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted January 25, 2017 Author Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) No need, the problem is evident. Edited January 25, 2017 by Nertea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LatiMacciato Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Just now, Streetwind said: @LatiMacciato @Kobymaru Can you replicate it with only NFE and its dependencies, in a fresh KSP installation? will try as I have the chance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streetwind Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Ah? Well then! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LatiMacciato Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 good to hear! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSaint Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 On 1/23/2017 at 0:27 PM, Nertea said: This took a while because motivation was low, but I think I'm back on the wagon now. I'm so glad to hear this. I was starting to get worried. Maybe I'll get back to playing KSP now as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Doctor Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 Glad to be among the first on this thread, you should update your link on spacedock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeaTac Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omnipius Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 There seems to be an issue with the USI reactors following the recent update to NFE. Now, the reactors show two instances of "Fission Reactor" converters, each with it's own Start/Deactivate and Reactor Control Panel buttons. One of these seems to activate the NFE core life tracking and the other activates electric generation. The real issue is that the two different converter instances show wildly different stats that appear to be impacting part performance. For example: The USI 1.25m Reactor now shows 3 separate stat blocks of: Fission Generator - 200 EC/s Fission Reactor - Required Cooling: 9kW, Inputs: EnrichedUranium 0.01/day, Outputs: DepletedFuel 0.01/day, EC 115/s, XenonGas 0.00/day Fission Reactor - Required Cooling: 150kw, Inputs: EnrichedUranium 0.01/day, Outputs: DepletedFuel 0.01/day When you operate this same reactor, the reactor control panel says it's max output is 12.3 EC/s! What is this? A reactor for ants? So, something is broken, though I'm not sure if its on the USI or NFE side. I'll try reverting to an earlier version of NFE for now to see if that sorts out the issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linuxgurugamer Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 On 1/23/2017 at 7:13 PM, Zhetaan said: @Nertea: Sorry to make more work for you. I do enjoy the pack and thanks for all the effort you've put into it. ???? I assume you made a bug report? What was it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhetaan Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 @linuxgurugamer: It was nothing terribly important. I just updated the AVC .version download link to point to the new forum thread instead of the deleted one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streetwind Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 4 hours ago, Omnipius said: There seems to be an issue with the USI reactors following the recent update to NFE. Now, the reactors show two instances of "Fission Reactor" converters, each with it's own Start/Deactivate and Reactor Control Panel buttons. The conversion patch had some work done on it recently. Perhaps the required module deletion calls were somehow lost. It's also possible that the modules were renamed on USI's side, necessitating an update to the conversion patch. I'll look into it later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linuxgurugamer Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 2 hours ago, Zhetaan said: @linuxgurugamer: It was nothing terribly important. I just updated the AVC .version download link to point to the new forum thread instead of the deleted one. Oh, ok. I just asked him about updating CKAN with the same info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.