Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Kerbal7 said:

No guy or gal has the 400 billion+ you'd need for a Human landing on Mars. You'd need taxpayers and they won't pay.

Like how taxpayers aren't currently paying for Tesla, SolarCity and more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DAL59 said:

He's planning on 2024.  How could something get delayed by a factor of 5, especially now that he just proved the FH works?  

Mind you i'm not even saying it will be spacex. And aren't FH and BFR completely different things?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gargamel said:

No, No... Don't Panic is a much better reference for a car in space.    I betcha there's a towel in the trunk too. 

Hopefully that displays properly... (you may have to click into the tweet, then the left-hand image to see the towel reference)

Edited by ElWanderer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Camacha said:

Like how taxpayers aren't currently paying for Tesla, SolarCity and more?

It's amazing how, even in the midst of what may be SpaceX's greatest event this year, people in this thread still manage to wander off topic. :confused:

 

But man, what great views on that webcast. Too bad the video team screwed up a little by accidentally putting the view from the same booster into both camera slots, but I can only assume that their fingers were shaking :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The core is likely toast. Doesn't matter, they want block 5 FH stuff, anyway.

Just now, Camacha said:

Like how taxpayers aren't currently paying for Tesla, SolarCity and more?

All the various subsidies combined and counted towards SpaceX still make SpaceX a bargain for NASA. Their own cost calculation formula puts the dev cost of Dragon 1 and 2 and the F9 to deliver to station at more than 10X what they actually spent.

SLS is an example of NASA cost models actually sorta working, or indeed underestimating costs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Streetwind said:

It's amazing how, even in the midst of what may be SpaceX's greatest event this year, people in this thread still manage to wander off topic. :confused:

 

But man, what great views on that webcast. Too bad the video team screwed up a little by accidentally putting the view from the same booster into both camera slots, but I can only assume that their fingers were shaking :P

Especially funny when they said it is definitely footage from two different boosters and seconds later you see them "both" going to same pad :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Streetwind said:

It's amazing how, even in the midst of what may be SpaceX's greatest event this year, people in this thread still manage to wander off topic. :confused:

But man, what great views on that webcast. Too bad the video team screwed up a little by accidentally putting the view from the same booster into both camera slots, but I can only assume that their fingers were shaking :P

I don't see anyone going off-topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tater said:

The core is likely toast. Doesn't matter, they want block 5 FH stuff, anyway.

All the various subsidies combined and counted towards SpaceX still make SpaceX a bargain for NASA. Their own cost calculation formula puts the dev cost of Dragon 1 and 2 and the F9 to deliver to station at more than 10X what they actually spent.

SLS is an example of NASA cost models actually sorta working, or indeed underestimating costs.

Be careful not to take my quote out of context. I just pointed to the fact the public is paying for Musk's other projects, so stating he isn't rich enough to go to Mars and that the taxpayer won't pay to make it happen doesn't seem to be accurate. Musk seems to be very good at getting funds for his projects.

I'm not criticizing it, which people seem to think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...