Jump to content

Eve phase angle


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, DunaManiac said:

I've googled phase angle charts but none are up to date.

How are they out of date? Was there a release that changed Eve or Kerbin's orbital characteristics? I'm not finding mention of such in the wiki's version history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's entirely possible that you have the 'correct' phase angle but have not taken into account

  • Eve's phase angle requires it to be behind Kerbin
  • Eve's inclination
  • your ejection angle retrograde is important, a few degrees off here can have a noticable effect on intercept.

"Sweep" Eve's orbit by :antiradial:/:radial: after you have adjusted inclination :antinormal:/:normal: to get the two orbits to intercept. You will need to make some adjustment's anyway because the phase angle calculations assume circular orbits.

Or if you feeling really keen, calculate the phase angles yourself to confirm. :) Kepler's Third law to get you started : (Orbital Period, OP)2 α (Semi-major Axis, SMA)3. It's all a bunch of ratio's after that.

Spoiler

Kerbin SMA: 13599840256m  - from center of Kerbin and the Sun

EVE SMA: 9832684544m 

Simplifying for later math: SMAeve = 0.723 SMAkerbin, OPeve = (0.723)3/2=0.61476261028 OPkerbin

SMAtransfer orbit = (SMAkerbin+SMAeve)/2 = 0.8615 SMAkerbin

OPtransfer orbit =0.86153/2= 0.79961866 OPkerbin

So we leave Kerbin, and arrive at Eve's orbit takes 1/2 OPtransfer orbit = 0.39980933 OPkerbin

We want to encounter Eve at that point so working backwards, Eve's travels a ratio of its full orbit  = 360 degrees *  OPtransfer orbit/OPeve 

= 360/2*(0.8615/0.723)3/2= 180*1.30069502 = 234.13 degrees to intersection point. 

But we leave Kerbin 180 degrees, directly opposite, the arrive point so Eve will be located 180-234.13 = 54.13 degrees behind Kerbin

This is exactly the same result from this excellent tool

Eccentricity  is 0.01 = 1% change of SMA giving ~ +3.45/-3.55 degrees error at most but that's well within ejection angle error for a lower TWR ship.

Nothing has changed. 

Edited by Weywot8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 7/4/2017 at 5:52 PM, HebaruSan said:

How are they out of date? Was there a release that changed Eve or Kerbin's orbital characteristics? I'm not finding mention of such in the wiki's version history.

Sorry, just wanted to be sure.

On 7/4/2017 at 9:08 PM, Weywot8 said:

It's entirely possible that you have the 'correct' phase angle but have not taken into account

  • Eve's phase angle requires it to be behind Kerbin
  • Eve's inclination
  • your ejection angle retrograde is important, a few degrees off here can have a noticable effect on intercept.

"Sweep" Eve's orbit by :antiradial:/:radial: after you have adjusted inclination :antinormal:/:normal: to get the two orbits to intercept. You will need to make some adjustment's anyway because the phase angle calculations assume circular orbits.

Or if you feeling really keen, calculate the phase angles yourself to confirm. :) Kepler's Third law to get you started : (Orbital Period, OP)2 α (Semi-major Axis, SMA)3. It's all a bunch of ratio's after that.

  Reveal hidden contents

Kerbin SMA: 13599840256m  - from center of Kerbin and the Sun

EVE SMA: 9832684544m 

Simplifying for later math: SMAeve = 0.723 SMAkerbin, OPeve = (0.723)3/2=0.61476261028 OPkerbin

SMAtransfer orbit = (SMAkerbin+SMAeve)/2 = 0.8615 SMAkerbin

OPtransfer orbit =0.86153/2= 0.79961866 OPkerbin

So we leave Kerbin, and arrive at Eve's orbit takes 1/2 OPtransfer orbit = 0.39980933 OPkerbin

We want to encounter Eve at that point so working backwards, Eve's travels a ratio of its full orbit  = 360 degrees *  OPtransfer orbit/OPeve 

= 360/2*(0.8615/0.723)3/2= 180*1.30069502 = 234.13 degrees to intersection point. 

But we leave Kerbin 180 degrees, directly opposite, the arrive point so Eve will be located 180-234.13 = 54.13 degrees behind Kerbin

This is exactly the same result from this excellent tool

Eccentricity  is 0.01 = 1% change of SMA giving ~ +3.45/-3.55 degrees error at most but that's well within ejection angle error for a lower TWR ship.

Nothing has changed. 

Woah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...